FlDO(Fast lDentity Online)를 이용한 비밀번호 없는 공인인증시스템에 관한 연구

김재중,Kim, Jae-Jung 한국정보과학회 2015 정보과학회지 Vol.33 No.5

공정거래정책 리포트 - 기업결합심사 관련 최근 동향 및 시사점

김재중,Kim, Jae-Jung 한국공정경쟁연합회 2012 경쟁저널 Vol.- No.163

RTCVD에 의한 다결정 $Si_{1-x}Ge_x$ 박막 증착

김재중,이승호,소명기,Kim, Jae-Jung,Lee, Seung-Ho,So, Myeong-Gi 한국재료학회 1995 한국재료학회지 Vol.5 No.6

The Poly-S $i_{1-x}$G $e_{x}$ thin films were deposited on oxidized Si wafer by RTCVD(rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition) using Si $H_4$and Ge $H_4$, at 450 ~5$50^{\circ}C$. The variation of Ge mole fraction and the deposition rate of S $i_{1-x}$G $e_{x}$ thin film were studied as a function of the deposition temperature and the Ge $H_4$/Si $H_4$input ratio, and the crystal phase and the surface roughness were studied by XRD and AFM(atomic force microscopy), respectively. The experimental results showed that the activation energy for the deposition of poly-S $i_{1-x}$G $e_{x}$ was about 32~37Kca /mol and the deposition rate of S $i_{1-x}$G $e_{x}$ thin films was increased with increasing the deposition temperature and the input ratio. From the analysis of composition, it was known that the Ge mole fraction within the poly-S $i_{1-x}$G $e_{x}$ thin film was decreased with decreasing the input ratio and increasing the deposition temperature. As-deposited S $i_{1-x}$G $e_{x}$ thin films were polycrystalline over the entire experimental range. But those were amorphous at the deposition temperature of 450, 475$^{\circ}C$ and the input ratio of 0.05. By adding the Ge $H_4$, poly-S $i_{1-x}$G $e_{x}$ thin film were deposited at relatively lower deposition temperatures($\leq$ 5$50^{\circ}C$) than those of conventional poly-Si(>$600^{\circ}C$). From surface roughness measurement of poly-S $i_{1-x}$G $e_{x}$ it was found that the surface roughness( $R_{i}$ ) increased with increasing the deposition temperature and input ratio.and input ratio. Oxidized Si wafer 위에 반응가스로 Si $H_4$과 Ge $H_4$을 사용하여 RTCVD(rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition)법으로 증착온도 450~5$50^{\circ}C$에서 다결정 S $i_{1-x}$G $e_{x}$ 박막을 증착하였다. 증착된 S $i_{1-x}$, G $e_{x}$ 박막은 증착온도와 Ge $H_4$Si $H_4$입력비 변화에 따른 Ge몰분율 변화와 증착속도에 대해 고찰하였으며, XRD와 AFM(atomic force microscopy)등을 이용하여 결정상과 표면거칠기 등을 조사하였다. 실험결과, 다결정 S $i_{1-x}$G $e_{x}$ 박막은 32~37 Kcal/mole의 활성화에너지 값을 가졌으며 증착속도는 증착온도와 입력비 중가에 따라 증가하였다. 또한 조성분석으로부터 입력비 감소와 증착온도 증가에 따라 Ge몰분율이 감소함을 알 수 있었다. 증착된 S $i_{1-x}$G $e_{x}$ 박막은 450, 475$^{\circ}C$에서 임력비가 0.05일때 비정질 형태로 존재하였으며 그 이외의 실험영역에서는 다결정 형태로 존재하였다. 기존의 다결정 Si 중착온도($600^{\circ}C$이상)와 비교하여 Ge $H_4$을 첨가함으로써 비교적 낮은온도(5$50^{\circ}C$이하) 영역에서 다결정 S $i_{1-x}$G $e_{x}$ 박막을 얻을 수 있었다. 또한 증착층의 표면거칠기를 측정한 결과, 증착온도와 입력비가 증가함에 따라 표면 거칠기( $R_{i}$ )가 증가함을 알 수 있었다.을 알 수 있었다.

혈액배양에서 분리된 임상적 주요 균주의 항균제사용량에 따른 내성률 변화

김재중(Jae-Jung Kim) 한국산학기술학회 2016 한국산학기술학회논문지 Vol.17 No.5

본 논문의 목적은 항균제 사용량(Defined Daily Dose. DDD)과 세균의 내성률(%)과의 상관성을 보고자 하였다. 항균 제 내성은 최근 다제 내성균들의 증가로 인하여 감염증의 치료가 점점 더 어려워져 임상적으로 중대한 문제가 되고 있다. 그리고, 여러 요인들 중에서 항균제 오남용은 항균제 내성의 주요 원인이 되고 있다. 중부권지역의 일개 2차 대학병원의 입원환자를 대상으로 병원전산통계 자료와 진단검사의학과의 미생물 프로그램을 이용 하여 2010년 1월부터 2014년 12월 까지 혈액배양에서 분리 동정된 Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli 균주에 대하여 항균제 사용량에 따른 균주의 내성률과의 상관성을 분석하기 위하여 균주 내성률과 항균제 사용량을 각각 조사하였다. 사용량에 따른 항균제 내성률은 pearson상관분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 cefepime사용량과 cefepime 내성 E. coli에서 유의한 상관관계가 있었고(P<0.033;r=0.907), tobramycin사용량과 tobramycin 내성 E.coli에서도 유의한 음의 상관관계가 있었다(P<0.028;r=-0.917). Aminoglycoside계열 내성 A.baumannii가 유의한 음의 상관관계를 나타냈고(P<0.048;r=-0.881), aminoglycoside계열 내성 E. coli도 유의한 음의 상관관계를 나타냈다(P<0.001 ;r=-0.992). 결론적으로 항균제 사용량은 일부 세균에서 내성률과 상관성이 있었다. The purpose of the study is to investigate the correlation between the amount of antimicrobial agent (Defined Daily Dose, DDD) and antimicrobial resistance rate (%)..The treatment of infectious diseases is becoming increasingly difficult, due to the increase in the number of multi-drug resistant bacteria, making it a clinically significant problem. Among the various factors, antimicrobial abuse is a major cause of antimicrobial resistance. The study was conducted on inpatients in a secondary university hospital in the central region utilizing the hospital's computerized statistical data and microbiological program of laboratory medicine from January 2010 to December 2014 pertaining to the dose of antimicrobial drugs for Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli strains isolated from blood culture. We analyzed the antimicrobial resistance rate per dose with the Pearson correlation coefficient. A significant (positive?) correlation was detected between the cefepime dose and the resistance of E. coli (P<0.033; r=0.907), while a significant negative correlation was found between the tobramycin dose and the resistance of E.coli. (P<0.028; r=-0.917). The aminoglycoside resistance of A. baumannii showed a significant negative correlation (P<0.048; r=-0.881), and the aminoglycoside resistance of E. coli showed a significant negative correlation as well (P<0.001; r=-0.992). In conclusion, the amount of antimicrobial agent (Defined Daily Dose, DDD) (is partly related to) the bacterial strain and its antimicrobial resistance rate (%).

부정기형에 있어 불이익변경금지 원칙 위반 여부를 판단하는 기준 : 대법원 2020.10.22. 선고 2020도4140 전원합의체 판결을 중심으로

김재중(Kim Jae Jung),이훈(Lee Hun) 원광대학교 법학연구소 2020 圓光法學 Vol.36 No.4

The case’s legal issue is on how to set the standard on violation of Principle of Prohibition on Disadvantageous Alteration in altering the Indeterminate Sentence to determinate sentence after the sentence of the first trial in the criminal case appeal. Regarding the case, the majority opinion of Supreme Court is that the standard shall be the middle point (11 years) between long-term (15 years) and short-term (7 years) and that the original trial’s sentence made based on the short term of 7 years is the misunderstanding and violation of the legal principles for Prohibition on Disadvantageous Alteration However, Supreme Court’s established opinion was to apply Principle of Prohibition on Disadvantageous Alteration based on short-term Indeterminate Sentence and the Defendant will be making a decision on whether to appeal accordingly. If the Defendant was to be sentenced of determinate sentence that exceeds the short term, the Prosecutor may file an appeal. As the Prosecutor who is a legal expert didn’t file an appeal against the sentence of the first trial, the Principle of Prohibition on Disadvantageous Alteration has been applied and the trial on the appeal case sentenced Defendant with 7 years of imprisonment for the determinate sentence. Considering the above Principle, this is a justified result. The Prosecutor may have not filed an appeal because the Prosecutor was willing to accept or the Prosecutor may have not filed an appeal by mistake due to overlooking such sentencing result. Nevertheless, it is unfair for the Supreme Court to alternate the precedent and remand the first trial after squashing to intensity the punishment upon the Defendant under the grounds of Principle of Liability. The Defendant has been given the possibility of release or execution termination under the Indeterminate Sentence made by the first trial and the Supreme Court’s decision severely infringes the procedural status. If the Defendant knew about the decision of the Supreme Court, it would have been more reasonable for the Defendant to make efforts for conditional release or completion of execution through service a short-term sentence at the point of one-third of the short sentence by cancelling the appeal where only the Defendant filed an appeal, confirming the Indeterminate Sentence in accordance with the sentence of the first trial, and getting a good execution performance. Supreme Court’s such sentence involves a severe infringement on Principle of Prohibition on Disadvantageous Alteration and it may reach unfair decision where Defendants’ right of appeal is suppressed or waivered in similar cases. Even if the sentence on the Defendant seems unjustifiably short, the sentence was short because the Prosecutor did not file an appeal and it was not the case of altering the precedent as Supreme Court’s majority opinion. The Supreme Court’s sentence failed to evaluate the importance properly and it is expected to face much criticism. Over the last 70 years, the Supreme Court’s established precedent settled down as a standard to be considered by the Defendant sentenced of Indeterminate Sentence and Prosecutor in deciding whether to file an appeal. The 21th century emphasizes on justice and human right and the Supreme Court’s alternation of the precedent in a way unfavorable to the Defendant is unreasonable on any account. If the sentence is too short compared to brutality of juvenile crime, there should be enactments to extend the sentence or lower the age standard for juvenile. The unreasonable alternation of precedent which had been continuing for over the last decades is unjustifiable and ought to be criticized. 이 사건은 형사 항소심에서 제1심이 선고한 부정기형을 정기형으로 변경해야 할 때 불이익변경금지 원칙 위반 여부를 판단하는 기준을 어떻게 설정할 것인지가 쟁점인 사건이다. 이에 대하여 대법원 다수의견은 이러한 경우 장기 15년과 단기 7년 사이의 중간지점(11년)을 기준으로 하여야 하는데 원심이 단기 7년을 기준으로 하여 판결을 선고한 것은 불이익변경금지 원칙의 법리를 오해하여 위법하다고 하고 있다. 그러나, 부정기형의 단기를 기준으로 불이익변경금지 원칙을 적용하는 것이 대법원의 확립된 견해이었고 피고인은 그에 따라 항소여부를 결정하게 될 것이므로 항소심에서 피고인이 단기를 초과하는 정기형을 선고받아야 마땅한 사안이라면 검사가 이를 위하여 항소하면 될 것이다. 법률 전문가인 검사가 1심판결에 대하여 항소를 하지 않은 결과 불이익변경금지의 원칙이 적용되어 항소심이 피고인에게 단기형을 기준으로 한 징역 7년의 형을 선고한 것은 위 원칙에 비추어 아주 정당한 결과이다. 검사는 이를 감수할 의사가 있었기에 항소하지 않았거나 이 결과에 대한 예상을 간과함으로써 실수로 항소를 하지 못하였을 수 있다. 그렇다고 하여 대법원이 책임주의 원칙을 근거로 종전 판례를 변경하면서까지 피고인에 대한 처벌을 강화하기 위하여 원심을 파기환송 하는 것은 1심에서 부정기형을 선고받아 단기를 기준으로 석방 또는 형 집행종료 가능성을 부여 받은 피고인에게 절차적 지위를 심각하게 침해하는 것으로서 너무나 큰 불의타를 안기는 것은 부당하다고 본다. 본문에서도 주장하였듯이 대법원의 결정을 미리 알았다면 피고인은 피고인만이 항소하였던 항소심에서 항소를 포기하고 1심 판결에 따라 부정기형을 확정시킨 후 행형성적을 잘 받아서 단기형의 3분의 1이 경과된 시점에서 가석방이 되도록 노력하거나 단기형을 복역하고 형의 집행을 종료할 수 있도록 노력하는 편이 훨씬 합리적이라고 보여 진다. 이러한 결론은 불이익변경금지 원칙이 심각하게 훼손될 가능성을 보여 주며 나아가서는 유사한 사례에서 피고인들의 상소권이 억제되거나 포기에 이르게 되는 부당한 결론에 도달하게 된다. 피고인에 대한 형량이 책임주의 원칙에 비추어 부당하게 적다고 생각된다 하더라도 이는 검사가 상소하지 않은 결과일 뿐이어서 대법원 다수의견처럼 판례를 변경할 일은 아닌 것이다. 대상판결은 본말이 전도된 판결로서 머지않아 많은 비판에 직면하게 될 것으로 예상된다. 거의 70년간 이어진 대법원의 확립된 판례는 부정기형을 선고받은 피고인과 검사가 항소여부를 결정할 때 고려하는 기준으로 어렵게 자리 잡았는데 정의와 인권을 강조하는 21세기에 이르러 갑자기 피고인에게 불리한 방향으로 판례를 변경하는 것은 어떤 이유에서든지 합리적 이유를 찾기 어렵다. 만약 소년들의 범죄가 흉포화 되는 데 비하여 선고형이 너무 낮아 이를 높이려 하거나 소년의 연령을 하향하려는 시도를 위해서는 입법으로 해결하여야 할 것이지 대상판결처럼 수십 년간 이어진 판례를 무리하게 변경하는 것은 잘못된 방향으로 비판받아 마땅하다.

낙동강 하구에서의 부유사 거동에 관한 연구

김재중(Jae-Joong Kim),김기철(Ki-Cheol Kim),이정만(Jung-Maan Lee) 한국해양공학회 1995 韓國海洋工學會誌 Vol.9 No.1

Numerical simulations on the suspended sediment transport in the Nakdong Estuary are carried out. Uncoupled flow model and diffusion model of which the governing equations are two-dimensional depth integrated equations are used in this study. Four cases are tested in this numerical simulations in which the Gaduk waterway open boundary condition and Nakdong Estuary Barrage boundary condition are considered as the boundary conditions.<br/> The simulated results are compared with the measured data which were obtained by NEDECO at hadan site on 1981.2.19. and by Dong-A university at one station in the study area on 1993.4.3. and show a good agreement with them. The construction of the Nakdong Estuary Barrage may affect to reduce the current near Jinudo and Daemadeung and the suspended sediment inflowed from the upstream in the wet season seems to be transported to the Dadae.

성폭력범죄자에 대한 전자감시제도

김재중 ( Jae Jung Kim ) 경상대학교 법학연구소 2010 法學硏究 Vol.18 No.1

위법수집증거배제법칙 적용기준

김재중(Kim, Jae-Jung) 충북대학교 법학연구소 2010 法學硏究 Vol.21 No.1

The exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence is originated from the American judicial precedent law as core of lawful process is a possibility of doing from criminal action. Thus, Chapter Ⅰ,Ⅱ examined the meaning of the exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence newly added to Article 308-2 of the Revised Criminal Procedure Code and discussed legal procedure as the theoretical ground for the exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence, and the exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence in major countries. Chapter Ⅲ discussed restrictions on the application of the exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence. The problem of harmony doesn't solve the conflict between voluntary search and the idea of safeguarding human rights in criminal justice. This important problem is widely discussed. Fragmentary and superficial approachment is not problem solution of systematic, more synthesis and inclusive studies. As a result, It considered in the exclusionary rule of illegally collected Evidence in Criminal Procedure Code in Korea, especially in relation to revised Criminal Procedure Code §308-2. It approach how to develop the exclusionary rule of illegally collected evidence. In Criminal Procedure Code, about evidence ability or recognize of illegally collected evidence, ask of true discovery doctrine and from this point of safeguarding human rights, what point of harmony to constitutional ideas in asking the movements of the due process.

CNN을 활용한 불꽃 및 연기 감지를 위한 영상분석 알고리즘에 관한 연구

김재중(Jae-Jung Kim),곽동걸(Dong-Kurl Kwak),류진규(Jin-Kyu Ryu),신종근(Jong-Keun Shin) 전력전자학회 2021 전력전자학술대회 논문집 Vol.2021 No.7

한국의 피해자참가제도

김재중(Kim, Jae-Jung) 충북대학교 법학연구소 2011 法學硏究 Vol.22 No.1

Recently, the Criminal Law Revision Committee in the Department of Justice offers the desirable introductions into our victim participation system by providing five provisions on criminal procedure act §§ 294-4~ 294-9. In order to adopt a direct participation system for crime victims, two possible ways are presently being considered. In the first proposal, crime victims become adverse parties in criminal trials (as in China or Germany). This proposal would require wide-ranging reforms of the current structure of the criminal litigation. Under the second way, crime victims are still participants in the criminal proceedings, but their right to and scope of participation is broadly expanded (as in Japan). This latter system allows the court to maintain - or only slightly modify - present criminal justice practices. I suggest the implementation of a victim participation system in Korea based primarily on the second model, but allowing crime victims abroad range of rights to participate in the criminal procedure, eventually admitting crime victims as quasi-adversarial parties at trial. After the initial implementation of the system, I believe that the second step is to move toward legislation following the first participation model. However, since the first model requires such tremendous changes in th present Korean criminal justice system, close monitoring of the victim participation model and further public discussions on this topic should be a prerequisite for adopting this model. The adoption of provisions to allow victims to participate in proceedings is an important change in the criminal procedure. Victims's right to participate in the proceedings is one of the main innovative features of the Court. Victim will have a right of Victim Impact Statement and Victim Statement Opinion in Korea. One of the court's main function is the establishment of truth and in this sense participation of victims may contribute to the accomplishment of this goal. A justice system cannot be complete without taking into account the existence of victims of crimes and what they have to say about the violence they have experienced during conflict situations.