신이상주의를 통한 인간성 회복의 모색

김상모(Kim, Sangmo) 한국언어문학회 2016 한국언어문학 Vol.99 No.-

In this study, I consider Park Younghee s the Artificial Laborers in point of Neoidealism. Commonly, this work has been understood under Marxism and Class struggle. Because it is easy to replace artificial laborers for the proletariat, and then revolution of artificial laborer points contemporary Class revolution. But in this point of view, it is difficult to explain the ending of this work. In the ending of the work, artificial laborers annihilate human and make themselves to human, but they cannot make a decendant. Only two artificial laborers sense each other, feel love, and live together as human. So the important thing is not revolution itself, but the transition from nonhuman to human. This transition accord with Park Younghee Neoidealism. Through the Neoidealism, he criticizes contemporary literary world. He thinks Many writers adapt Japanese Naturalism unquestioningly. And naturalism is just focused on outside of it doesn t associate with Korean reality. So Park Younghee claims Neoidealism that can overcome disillusive real world. It is important that recovery of humanity like love, life, sympathy in Neoidealism. Park Younghee thinks sense is heart of that recovery. People can imagine other s pain and empathize each other by sense. Without sense, people like as machines or robots. In the Artificial Laborers, humans that make artificial laborers, try to make them perfect human through liberation from labor. But they don t empathize artificial laborers, they deal artificial laborers with products. This neglect about sense makes humans to nonhumans like machines. So ultimately, Park Younghee expects recovery of humanity in the Artificial Laborers. To solve laborers pain and problems, he thinks recovery of sense is first step. Because only if people can imagine other s pain by sense, they can see problems of society directly and act to solve that problems.

정책이전 측면에서 바라본 한국 테크노파크 도입결정사례 연구

김상모 ( Sangmo Kim ) 한국생산성학회 2017 生産性論集 Vol.31 No.3

By making use of a policy transfer framework, this study examines issues on policy transfer theory and analyzes policy making processes for construction of Korea`s technoparks. Major findings are as below. Firstly, during the 1990s, the megatrends of a worldwide technopark boom and the launch of WTO motivated the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) to introduce technopark policies voluntarily. These megatrends helped MOTIE overcome traditional sectionalism in Korea which disrupted MOTIE`s introduction of technopark policies. The case of policy making for construction of technoparks in Korea involved both voluntary and coercive elements although it falls into the voluntary transfer category. Before MOTIE introduced technoparks in Korea, the Ministry of Science and Technology(MOST) constructed Daedeok technopolis and planned to construct more technopoleis. The technoparks introduced by MOTIE focus on supporting local companies while the science parks introduced by MOST set a high value on R&D itself. The difference between them was made by the gap between missions of the two ministries. Secondly, MOTIE tried to build technoparks in their own style. It learned from successful techoparks in the USA, UK, Germany, France, Japan and Taiwan about their construction, size, location, and government support. Critical success factors of technoparks in developed countries include top-tier research universities, advanced technology-based companies, notable venture capital firms, good leaders and strong government supports for them. Every successful technopark has its own merits that make it a successful venture. In the case of Korean technoparks, factors that act as both catalysts and constraints on transfer include policy objectives, actors, characteristics of technoparks and existing policies. Thirdly, distinctive features of Korean-style technoparks include the establishment of third-sector organizations for technopark constructions, small scale parks, various types of locations including universities and industrial complexes, as well as unique government support tools including tax incentives and financial support. In terms of operating organizations, technoparks in Korea, operated by non-profit third-sector organizations, are similar to Kumamoto Technopolis and Kanagawa Science Park in Japan rather than Stanford Research Park, Hsinchu Science Park and Sophia Antipolis. University-led technoparks tend to be located in universities while local government-led technoparks tend to be located in industrial parks. Although Korean technopark policies are transferred from developed countries, due to path dependence, most of the supporting measures for them originate from existing measures for other policy areas such as industrial complexes. Fourthly, in the case of Korean technopark policies, the degree of the policy transfer has both the characteristics of emulation and combination. MOTIE learned from Japanese technopoleis and science parks to introduce third-sector type operating organizations. However, Korean technoparks have not adopted profit-making type organizations for their operation. MOTIE established their own technopark policies transferred from various developed countries.

투명전도성 박막의 활용을 위한 스퍼터링 증착 기술과 전망

김상모 ( Sangmo Kim ),김경환 ( Kyung Hwan Kim ) 한국전기전자재료학회 2023 전기전자재료학회논문지 Vol.36 No.2

For decades, sputtering as a physical vapor deposition (PVD) method has been a widely used technique for film coating processes. The sputtering enables oxides, metals, alloys, nitrides, etc to be deposited on a wide variety of substrates from silicon wafers to polymer substrates. Meanwhile, transparent conductive oxides (TCOs) have played important roles as electrodes in electrical applications such as displays, sensors, solar cells, and thin-film transistors. TCO films fabricated through a sputtering process have a higher quality leading to an improved device performance than other films prepared with other methods. In this review, we discuss the mechanism of sputtering deposition and detail the TCO materials. Related technologies (processing conditions, materials, and applications) are introduced for electrical applications.

천리안3호위성 정보수집 탑재체(DCS)용 L-대역 100W급 반도체 고출력 증폭기 설계

김상모(Sangmo Kim),김창민(Changmin Kim),정형진(Hyungjin Jung),이영완(Youngwan Lee),주인권(Inkwon Joo) 한국항공우주학회 2023 한국항공우주학회 학술발표회 논문집 Vol.2023 No.6

리더의 교체와 조직 성과

박지현(Jeehyun Park),곽상모(Sangmo Kwak),김양민(Yangmin Kim),이승혜(Seunghye Lee) 연세대학교 경영연구소 2017 연세경영연구 Vol.54 No.1

본 논문은 Rowe et al.(2005)의 NHL 하키팀을 대상으로 한 리더 교체에 대한 선행연구가 타 종목의 스포츠에도 적용되는 지를 검증하기 위하여 미국의 메이저리그 야구팀을 대상으로 리더의 교체가 팀 성과에 어떠한 영향을 미치는가에 대하여 연구하였다. 본 연구는 감독뿐만 아니라 단장의 교체도 함께 연구함으로서 이 분야 연구의 폭을 넓히고자 하였다. 프로야구 구단의 단장은 선수의 리크루팅을 책임지는 사람으로서 경기 중의 선수기용과 작전에 영향력을 행사하는 감독 못지않게 야구팀의 성과에 중요한 영향을 미치는 것으로 여겨지고 있다. 1988년부터 2012년까지 15년간의 기간을 대상으로 30개의 미국의 메이저리그 야구팀을 대상으로 감독과 단장의 시즌 도중 교체와 시즌 간의 교체가 각각 팀 성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 연구 결과 시즌 중 감독 및 단장의 교체는 모두 팀의 해당시즌 성과에 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 기존의 리더 교체 이론 중, 리더의 교체가 성과 상승이라는 본연의 목적 보다는, 성적이 부진한 팀에서 급격한 리더의 교체로 오히려 팀의 사기가 떨어지고 현황 파악을 하지 못한 새 리더가 갖는 불리함 때문에 성적 저하가 일어난다는 악순환(vicious cycle) 이론을 지지하는 결과이다. 한편, 감독이나 단장의 교체 시기별로는 별 성과 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 즉 시즌 간의 교체를 겪은 팀이나 시즌 중에 교체를 겪은 팀이나 유의미한 성과 차이는 나타나지 않았다. 한편 단장의 시즌 중 교체를 겪은 팀에서는 당해년도의 잔여승률에는 의미 있는 변화가 나타나지 않았지만, 그 다음 시즌의 승률은 유의미하게 상승하는 것을 발견하였다. 이러한 결과를 토대로 본 연구는 시사점 및 한계점에 대하여 논의하였다. In order to verify the external validity of Rowe et al. (2005)’s study on leader succession and organizational performance in the NHL hockey teams, this study examines the impacts of leader succession on organization performance in the Major League Baseball Teams. Our study extends the existing studies of this area by examining both managers’ and GM (general managers)’s successions and their impacts on organizational performance. Previous sports-related studies including Rowe et al. (2005) have concluded that between-season succession (ritual scapegoating theory) does not impact team performance, while within-season succession (vicious-circle theory) tends to worsen team performance. By analyzing 30 Major League baseball teams leader successions between 1988 and 2015, we confirm these conclusions. We found that teams that have a coach and GM within-season successions are associated with worse performance in that season than those teams that do not. On the other hand, there are no statistically significant differences in team performance between teams that experience within-season successions and teams that experience between-season successions for both manager and GM successions. However, teams that experience within season GM successions, show statistically meaningful team performance improvements in the following seasons. Based on these results, we discuss theoretical contributions and practical implications.