http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
강길호(Kil-Ho Kang) 한국언론학회 2005 커뮤니케이션 이론 Vol.1 No.2
본 연구의 목적은 과학적 연구방법론의 입장에서 한국적 커뮤니케이션 현상의 이론화를 구축하기 위한 방안을 논의하려는 것이다. 구체적으로, 한국적 커뮤니케이션 연구의 이론화라는 관점에서 우리 학계가 쓰고 있는 과학적 연구방법의 문제점을 지적하고 이러한 문제점을 어떻게 보완하여야 할 것인지에 대한 방안을 모색하고 있다. 과학적 연구방법론이 한국적 커뮤니케이션의 이론화에 기여하기 위해서는 과학적 연구방법론을 단순한 연구수단이 아니라 연구 아이디어를 창출하는 수단으로 활용하여야 한다는 점을 본 연구는 강조하고 있다. 또한 이러한 관점에서 과학적 연구방법론의 원리를 재조명하고 연구 아이디어를 얻는 방식에 따라 연구 유형화를 시도함으로써 결과적으로 과학적 연구방법론이 어떻게 연구 아이디어를 얻는 수단으로 활용될 수 있는지를 논의하고 있다. 더 나아가서 본 연구에서 제안된 연구 유형화의 틀에 따라 우리 학계의 기존 연구들을 내용분석함으로써 한국적 이론화라는 측면에서 기존 연구들의 문제점과 한계를 밝히고 있다. 그러고 나서 이러한 문제점을 해결할 수 있는 방안을 제시하고 있다. This research purposes to review and evaluate scientific research method popularly employed in Korea in order to provide the basis of theory-building on communication phenomena in our society from Korean perspective. This study addresses the problems of scientific research method used in Korean society of communication, particularly from the perspective of theorization on communication phenomena in Korea. This research claims that scientific research method shoul be regarded not as research means but as a tool of producing research ideas. Along with this claim, the principles of scientific research method and the categorization of research were introduced. Previous research was content-analyzed on this research categorization, which led to find the current problems in terms of a tool of producing research method. Finally, this research discusses various ways to solve these problems as well as to settle down theorization of Korean communication phenomena by using scientific research method as a tool of producing research ideas.
정귀애(Gui-Ae Jeong),조규석(Gyu-Seok Cho),이문수(Moon-Su Lee),김용진(Yong-Jin Kim),강길호(Kil-Ho Kang),김형수(Hyung-Soo Kim),김형철(Hyung-Chul Kim) 대한외과학회 2009 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research(ASRT) Vol.77 No.2
Purpose: Radical gastrectomy and lymph node dissection is the treatment of choice for gastric cancer but the efficacy of surgical treatment of recurrent gastric cancer has been debated. We evaluated the efficacy of surgical treatment for recurrent gastric cancer. Methods: We collected the data on 108 recurrent gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastrectomy and lymph node dissection for gastric cancer and analyzed the clinicopathologic data, the patterns of recurrence of gastric cancer, and the strategies of treatment for recurrent gastric cancer. Results: The patterns of recurrence were 32 locoregional, 26 hematogenous, 24 peritoneal, and 26 mixed recurrences. The strategies of treatment for recurrent gastric cancer were the combination of surgical treatment and chemotherapy in 31 cases (28.7%), chemotherapy alone in 49 cases (45.4%), and conservative treatment in 28 cases (25.9%). The morbidity and mortality in reoperation group were 35.5% and 9.7%, respectively. The mean survival after recurrence was 25.4, 12.7, and 4.9 months in reoperation group, chemotherapy group and conservative treatment group, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the differentiation of primary tumor, patterns of recurrence, and the strategies of treatment for recurrent gastric cancer were related with survival after recurrence of gastric cancer. Conclusion: Our data suggested that the more aggressive and intensive treatment such as surgical treatment could improve the survival rate for recurrent gastric cancer. Therefore, if the patients’ conditions are tolerable and there is resectability, surgical treatment may be an applicable strategy for recurrent gastric cancer in terms of long-term survival.