RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재후보

        The Challenges of Writing in the Disciplines

        ( John Gage ) 서강대학교 언어정보연구소 2010 언어와 정보 사회 Vol.12 No.-

        The essay reviews some of the philosophical justifications that underlie methods of teaching writing, citing classical rhetoric (in the European tradition) as the source of these assumptions in the conflict between Plato and the Sophists over the ethical problem of teaching an art of persuasion. The three philosophical justifications for teaching writing that I discuss are (1) Teaching students formal strategies of argument that give them power over others by manipulating their beliefs. (The Sophists) (2) Teaching students pure reasoning so that they will not be deceived by the strategies of persuasive discourse. (Plato) (3) Teaching writing as a process of discovering sharable grounds for agreement on issues not subject to pure reason. (Aristotle). It is the third justification that best warrants the teaching of writing across the curriculum as a way to "write to learn" rather than "learn to write," because it is this justification that imagines a world of discourse in which people disagree about fundamental questions and yet strive to reason together toward mutual understandings, i.e. the basic condition of university inter-disciplinarity. This essay therefore addresses, “how to imagine alternatives to technical competency as a basis for using writing to learn the knowledge of disciplinary fields.”

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼