RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • LA EXPERIENCIA EN PRISIÓN DE EXPOLICÍAS SENTENCIADOS POR SECUESTRO EN MÉXICO

        Miquel Ángel Ruiz Torres,Elena Azaola Institute of Iberoamerican Studies Pusan Universit 2012 International Journal of Latin American Studies Vol.2 No.2

        Resumen. Durante el primer mes de la presidencia de Felipe Calderón en 2006, los reclusos condenados por el delito de secuestro fueron concentrados en módulos de alta seguridad en algunas cárceles mexicanas. Esta política de agrupación de tales internos se dijo obedecer a la necesidad de incrementar la seguridad y vigilancia alrededor de los delincuentes más peligrosos. Entre ellos había ex policías encarcelados como consecuencia de varias sentencias en su contra por delitos de privación ilegal de libertad (además de otros delitos) cometidos durante el ejercicio de su labor profesional. En general, estos ex policías expresaron la creencia de que con su encarcelamiento se había cometido una enorme injusticia contra ellos. Basándose en diferentes entrevistas etnográficas llevadas a cabo a finales de 2006 en la penitenciaría de Santa Martha Acatitla, ubicada en la Ciudad de México, a un total de 35 reclusos varones ex policías (que constituían el total de los mismos en dicho módulo), este artículo trata de comprender por qué estos hombres continuaban sintiéndose inocentes a pesar de reconocer en muchos casos haber cometido el crimen por el que se les condenaba. El objetivo principal de este texto es evaluar hasta qué punto la experiencia carcelaria precarizada y subordinada que viven estos presos viene marcada por los requerimientos de las reglas informales que asumieron y de la identidad social que pactaron cuando fueron policías. Teniendo en cuenta el itinerario interrumpido de los ex policías que los ha llevado a estar encerrados, este artículo pretende aportar conocimiento sobre el alcance de la relación y los elementos compartidos entre la cultura policial y la cultura carcelaria. Buscando estos nexos en común se harán algunas aportaciones a la discusión teórica sobre qué rasgos comparten y cómo se construyen aquellas culturas locales que surgen del dispositivo institucional jurídico punitivo del Estado y de sus efectos de poder sobre individuos y cuerpos especialmente en relación a los modos de vida generados como consecuencia de las prácticas informales e ilegales. Abstract. During the first months of President Felipe Calderon in 2006 prisoners convicted of kidnapping were concentrated in high-security modules in some Mexican prisons. This policy of grouping prisoners obeyed, as the rulers, the need for increased security and safety on the most dangerous criminals. Among them were ex police officers jailed as a result of judgments against him for crimes of kidnapping (and other crimes) committed in the exercise of their professional work. Between the ex police officers there was a common belief that they have been unfairly treated. Based on different ethnographic interviews conducted in late 2006 in the prison of Santa Martha Acatitla, located in Mexico City, to a total of 35 male ex police officers inmates (being all the ex police in prison module), this article tries to explain in part why these men kept feeling innocents regardless of the fact that they didn’t deny having been committed the crime they have been charged with. The main purpose of this paper is to evaluate to which extends the precarious existence these inmates have in prison has to do with the requirements and informal rules they learned and the social identity they agree while they were police officers. Taking into account the interrupted itinerary they had as police officers, this article tries to yield some knowledge between the share elements of the police and the prison subcultures. Trying to identify those common elements, we participate in the theoretical debate about those common features and about how those subcultures are built as a result of the punitive State power and of its effects in individuals and their bodies, especially in relation to a way of life that is a consequence of informal and illegal practices. Miquel Ángel Ruiz Torres ∙ Elena Azaola 141 Palabras Clave: Policía, prisión, secuestro, cultura policial, cultura carcelaria Key Words: Police, prison, kidnapping, police culture, prison culture

      • Concerning a Special Use of the Concept of "Humanity," as a Political Norm Disclosed in a Complex Communication's Structure

        Miquel, Paul-Antoine 한림대학교 한림과학원 2008 개념과 소통 Vol.1 No.1

        우리는 이 논문에서 “인류” 또는 “완벽한 인간종”이라는표현에서 '인간적'이라는 형용사가 어떻게 사용되고 있는지를 보여 주고자 한다. 그것은 어떤 인간적 본질도 드러내지 않는다. 우리는 그런 표현이 우리와 다른 동물들 간의 존재론적 차이를 도입한다고 보는 “테제” 그리고 인간종의 본성이 무엇인지를 우리 자신으로부터 직접 알 수 있다는 “테제”를 거부한다. 이러한 테제와 반대로 우리는 인간종[인류]이라는 말이 권력의 복합적 관계를 통해 구성된다고 주장할 것이다. 이러한 권력관계에 의해, 그리고 자연과학의 성장 덕택에 우리는 미래 세대의 행동에 기술적으로 그리고 의학적으로 힘을 행사할 수 있게 되었다. 그러나 이러한 관계는 또한 “구성성(constructability)”이라는 상호적이지 않은 원리에 기초하는 상징적인 것이기도 하다. 우리는 마치 인간종의 본성[인류]이 단지 생물학적 기준에 의해서만 해결될 수 있는 정치적 문제로 취급될 수 있는 것처럼 행동하지만, 사실 우리는 인간종의 본성이 정치적 규범과 동시에 생각되어야 하는 것처럼 행동해야 한다. 이 두 번째 생각에 의해 우리는 우리 자신을 열린 민주주의적 관계 속에서 미래 세대의 대표자로 구성해야 한다. 이것이 우리가 바로 여기서 분석하고 발전시키려는 것이다. We try to show in this paper, how the qualifier “human” has to be used, in the expression “humanity,” or “integrity of the human species.” It doesn't disclose any human essence, and we reject what we could call “the Thesis,” by which such an expression would introduce a difference of being between us an others animals and by which we would know immediately from ourselves, what the humanity of a human species could be. We argue on the contrary that the human species is constituted through a complex relation of power, by which, thanks to the growth of natural sciences, we are able to act technically and medically on the action of our future offspring. Yet, this relation is also a symbolical one, which is founded on a non reciprocal principle of “constructability”: despite acting as if the humanity of the human species could be treated as a political problem that can be solved only with biological criteria, we must act as if the humanity of the human species has to be thought in the same time as a political norm. By this second “as if” we have to constitute ourselves as the representative of our future offspring in an open and democratic relation that we try to analyse and develop.

      • KCI등재
      • Concerning a Special Use of the Concept of 'Humanity', as a Political Norm Disclosed in a Complex Communication's Structure

        Paul-Antoine Miquel 한림대학교 한림과학원 2008 개념과 소통 Vol.0 No.1

        We try to show in this paper, how the qualifier “human”has to be used, in theexpression“ humanity,”or“ integrity of the human species.”It doesn’t disclose anyhuman essence, and we reject what we could call “the Thesis,”by which such anexpression would introduce a difference of being between us an others animalsand by which we would know immediately from ourselves, what the humanity of ahuman species could be. We argue on the contrary that the human species is constituted through a complexrelation of power, by which, thanks to the growth of natural sciences, we are able toact technically and medically on the action of our future offspring. Yet, this relation is also a symbolical one, which is founded on a non reciprocalprinciple of “constructability”: despite acting as if the humanity of the humanspecies could be treated as a political problem that can be solved only withbiological criteria, we must act as if the humanity of the human species has to bethought in the same time as a political norm. By this second “as if”we have toconstitute ourselves as the representative of our future offspring in an open anddemocratic relation that we try to analyse and develop.

      • KCI등재후보

        The Dark Lantern : Bergsonian Conception of Intuition

        Paul-Antoine Miquel 서양근대철학회 2010 근대철학 Vol.5 No.1

        On the contrary to Plato, intuition is originally obscurity and darkness, in Bergson’s view. In Matter and memory, the past is coming from obscurity into the light of actuality, from unconsciousness to consciousness. Later (la Pensé e et le mouvant), Bergson defines intuition as a thinking in duration, a mere and “direct” “vision” that coincides initially with the visible object. It shows that what is intuited by intuition is also a pure immanent datum in consciousness, since duration is lived. But duration is not life. Life deals with something that is “vital”, and not only with something that is “lived”. It deals not only with the immanent duration in consciousness, but also with the immanent duration of the universe as a whole. That’s why we need sympathy. This requires an enlargement of intuition, which is also a reflection, in conformity with the image of the dark lantern. Intuition needs to go outside of itself. It needs to reflect and also to be reflected in the surrounded world. Therefore, we cannot stay in a pure proximity with ourselves in this so called immanent sphere of pure data. We need a radical “decentration” as an enlarged reflexion. It is operated through the relations between intuition and intelligence. We see from outside what is inside, we see from a cosmological point of view what is present in our mind. In other words, we need sympathy between intuition and intelligence in order to sympathize, as philosophers, with the immanent duration which is present into the universe.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        Repeated spurious elevation of serum prostate-specific antigen values solved by chemiluminescence analysis: A possible interference by heterophilic antibodies

        Arturo Domínguez,Miquel Bayó,Jesús Muñoz-Rodríguez,Jose Antonio Bellido,Jose María Abascal-Junquera,Naim Hannaoui,Josep Maria Banús 대한비뇨의학회 2015 Investigative and Clinical Urology Vol.56 No.11

        Heterophilic antibodies are human immunoglobulins directed against various animal antigens. They can produce false-positive results in the analysis of different tumor markers, including prostate-specific antigen. This interference can lead to misdiagnosis, unnecessary tests, and overtreatment in some cases. We present herein the case of a 52-year-old man with repeated spurious elevation of prostate-specific antigen, reaching levels of 108.7 ng/mL, that were suspected to be caused by heterophilic antibodies. The interference was solved by changing the analysis technique. Real values of prostate-specific antigen were less than 1 ng/mL.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼