http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 최민영 (검색결과 295 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
최민영 한국형사법학회 2019 刑事法硏究 Vol.31 No.2
The human biological materials as defined in Bioethics And Safety Act are a component of the human body, such as a tissue, a cell, blood, or body fluid collected or extracted from the human body, or serum, plasma, chromosomes, DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid), RNA (Ribonucleic Acid), protein, etc. isolated from such component. The word “human biological materials”itself still quite sounds unfamiliar but they can be easily encountered during the healthcare routine. In addition, their potential value for use could lead to legal disputes in many aspects. Therefore, criminal regulation over the use of the materials has become more and more important. In this context, this article aims to shed light on their status within a criminal system and their nature as a logical prerequisite to discuss the use of and criminal regulation over the human biological materials. First, the article gives an overview of the definition of human biological materials and how they can be categorized, and discusses their legal characteristics and status with reference to existing theories from civil act and relevant German court decisions. This is because the issue has been traditionally framed within the law of civil matters, and only after properly introducing the discussion observed in the area first could the line of thinking be converted to criminal context. Following that, and based on the previous observation, how the legal nature and status of human biological materials should be defined is highlighted. And different case examples are introduced to see whether handling the materials should be subject to provisions of injury. In the conclusion, this article decides that human biological materials, in consideration of the development of healthcare science and technology and ordinary use cases of the word itself, should be included in the scope of “body” and therefore injuring them can be subject to crimes of injury or assault in the Criminal Act of the Republic of Korea. 생명윤리법에서 정의하고 있는 인체유래물은 “인체로부터 수집하거나 채취한 조직․세포․혈액․체액 등 인체구성물 또는 이들로부터 분리된 혈청, 혈장, 염색체, DNA, RNA, 단백질 등”을 말한다. 인체유래물은 아직까지 생소한 개념에 속하나 의료일상에서 손쉽게 접할 수 있다. 뿐만 아니라, 인체유래물의 잠재적 이용가치로 인해 여러 측면에서 법률적 분쟁을 발생시킬 수 있다. 이에 따라 인체유래물 이용에 있어 형법적 규율의 문제도 점점 더 중요해지고 있다. 이러한 배경에서 본 논문은 인체유래물의 이용과 형법적 규율의 문제를 논하기 위한 기초적 전제로서 인체유래물 자체의 형법적 지위와 성격을 논하였다. 이를 위해 우선, 인체유래물의 개념과 분류를 짧게 개관하고, 인체유래물의 법적 성격과 지위를 기존 민법이론과 관련 독일판례를 중심으로 논하였다. 왜냐하면, 종래 인체유래물의 법적 성격과 지위는 주로 민사상 문제 중심으로 이루어져 왔기 때문이다. 따라서 이와 같은 민사상 논의를 소개한 이후, 이 논의가 형법에도 전용될 수 있다고 보았다. 이어서 이를 기초로 형법상 인체유래물의 법적 성격과 지위를 어떻게 바라봐야 하는지를 논하고, 인체유래물을 다루는 행위가 상해죄 규정의 적용을 받을 수 있는지를 여러 경우의 사례로 구분하여 논하였다. 결론적으로 의과학기술의 발달 수준과 일상언어의 사용례를 고려하면, 곧 다시 자신의 신체와 연결될 목적으로 분리된 인체유래물은 “신체”의 범위에 포함되어서 이를 훼손한 행위는 우리 형법상 상해나 폭행에 해당할 수 있다고 판단하였다.
-
-
-
양전자 방출 단층 촬영술로 진단된 대동맥 스탠트 감염의 항생제 단독 사용을 통한 비수술적 치료 1예
최민영,오현정,권경주,송은미,김수현,전윤희,김유경,최희정 대한감염학회 2010 Infection and Chemotherapy Vol.42 No.6
Aortic stent infection is a rare problem, but severe sequelae such as stent occlusion,aortic necrosis and rupture, and life-threatening sepsis can occur. Surgical removal and antibiotic therapy has been the mainstay of treatment, but the management of stent infection still remains controversial as to the time of removal operation or the prognosis regarding the use of antibiotics alone as the treatment modality. Recently,we experienced a case of delayed aortic stent infection that was treated with antibiotics alone. A 68-year-old man presented with unexplained fever of several days’ duration. The patient had a history of having had an aortic stent inserted 8 years ago due to traumatic aortic rupture. Blood culture was positive for Staphylococcus aureus and positron emission tomography revealed focal intense nodular uptake at medial and inferior aspect of the aortic arch. He was therefore diagnosed with aortic stent infection due to Staphylococcus aureus and was successfully treated with name of antibiotics alone without recourse to surgery.
-
-
-
The DNA Identification Act in South Korea: Issues of Justifiability and Efficacy
최민영 서울대학교 아시아태평양법연구소 2015 Journal of Korean Law Vol.15 No.1
The DNA Identification Act was enacted in South Korea in 2010 after a long series of discussions spanning 15 years. The DNA Identification Act deals with how to collect and use DNA samples from criminal suspects and how to retain the derived information in a database. First, Part II of this paper describes the legislative process and contents of the DNA Identification Act, illustrating the conflict between different interest groups concerned respectively about public safety and individual freedoms. Part III discusses the implications of this Act to the current criminal justice policy in South Korea and discusses whether the DNA Identification Act is necessary by examining risk management policy as well as asking whether the expanded DNA database has an effect on crime prevention. Part IV analyzes whether the current Act is justifiable by focusing on its three legislative purposes: criminal investigation, crime deterrence, and protection of individual rights and reviews major issues of this Act.
-
최민영,최석윤 한국비교형사법학회 2012 비교형사법연구 Vol.14 No.1
A piracy is on an increasing trend every year, despite the effects of international coordination and cooperation to prevent it. Especially, the pirates around Somalia are becoming bigger, systematic and ferocious. Above all, Korean ships and sailors have become good targets of the pirates, like Samho Jewelry incident. In such a situation, it would be effective for the piracy prevention to judge Somalia piracy in Korea. The Supreme Court confirmed the original verdict to the Somali pirates, as imposing punishments for crimes of an attempted murder by maritime robbery, an attempted murder by robbery, an injury by maritime robbery, an injury by robbery and an accidental injury by obstruction of the performance of special official duties and for an violation against Act on punishing harm to a ship and maritime structure. This paper would examine the issues of criminal trial on the Somali pirates through dividing into issues of substantive law and those of procedural law. Issues regarding the substantive law about Somali piracy acts are the range of application of the Criminal Law, the names of a crime depending on patterns of acts and number of crime, and the range of accomplice. Issues regarding the procedural law about Somali piracy acts are legality of arrestment, extradition and imprisonment, time to guarantee the right to have counsel. In addition, it would be discussed if absolute cosmopolitanism should be introduced into the criminal law, if the legislation of 'Special Bill on Korean Army Activities in the Somali-waters' is indeed necessary, and how sea robbery in criminal law should be revised.
-
-
KCI
스콜라연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
