http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 高藤 英樹 (검색결과 4 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
高藤英樹(Hideki Takafuji) 동북아시아문화학회 2009 동북아 문화연구 Vol.1 No.18
The characteristics of Japan’s party system has been one party system based on Liberal Democratic Party(LDP) since the end of World War Ⅱ,though the system has been changing itself since early 1990s. In Japan, the end of cold war has been promoting socio‐economic disparity, especially income inequality with deeping of globalization through the 1990s to 2000s and then Japan has experienced a large scale of strains in its socio‐economic aspect. Therefore, in Japan, two party system has been discussed politically and scholarly but one party system based on LDP has essencially sustained although it is a form of a coalition. In that sense, it is said that the party system of Japan has comparatively contributed to political stability since the end of War. This is not only the reason why Japan had experienced political violences and economic strikes less than other countries, but also in Japan political parties themselves at the parliamentary system have played a magnificant role of interest summing up and articulation of citizens and have eventually become a vent of their political discontents. It may be said that the above things —the characteristics of Japan’s party system and their roles or functions—could apply to the counterparts of Malaysia’s party system with multi‐ethnicity defferent from the social context of Japan too as we will discuss later. Similarly as we will concider afterward, a large scale of differences on electoral systems and ethnicity as social cleaverage exists between Japan and Malaysia, but there are following essencial question and analysis in this article, that is, some similarlities in the structures and function of party system exist between Malaysia and Japan. Therefore, this article will analyze Malaysia’s party system in comparison with the counterpart of Japan.
-
日本からみたマレーシアの｢ヘゲモニー政党制｣の適応性 - 都市部における社会経済変動に対するその適応性 -
高藤 英樹(다카후지 히데키) 일본어문학회 2006 일본어문학 Vol.35 No.-
In Japan, we have managed to socio-economic development, socio-economic equality and political stability at the same time, and also the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) have established one party dominant party system, particularly through the period of 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. Conventionally, as socio-economic development is firstly pursued, socioeconomic inequality, especially inequality of income distribution is expanded, economic strikes and political demonstrations may be caused, and as a result political instability may be brought about. In the same way as just like in the case of other developing countries, in that of Malaysia, because the country have had priority over socio-economic development, the inequality had resulted particularly through the period of 1960s and 1970s. But in the case of Malaysia different from those of Japan and the other developing countries, in spite of its socio-economic inequality, it has enjoyed political stability since 1970s. It seems that this is due to the characteristics of its party system rather than some socioeconomic policies by Malaysian government.<BR> Thereby, this article tries to consider to how Malaysia’s party system, in other word, the “hegemonic party system” absorbed socio-economic discontents caused by the socioeconomic inequality and contributed to political stability. Particularly, it takes up the First Oil Crisis in urban areas as the analytic case. Since, during this period, the socioeconomic inequality and economic state were worse than those at other time. Therefore the analysis is conducted as follows: Firstly, urban economy and the First Oil Crisis are featured. Secondly, the economic policies by government and as a result, economic malcontents in urban areas are characterized. Lastly, how Malaysia’s hegemony party system absorbed the socio-economic discontents brought about by unequal income distribution and the Oil Crisis, and stabilized the politics will be analyzed. It appears that, based on these analysises, the original model of Malaysia’s political development is able to be described as we previously pointed out.
-
-
KCI
DBpia연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
