RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    企業結合의 規制에 관한 硏究 = A Study on the Regulation of Merger

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2074523

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Monopolistic and oligopolistic through merger is one of the most controversial problems in modern economic life. As a result of Mergers, the economies of large Scale, accumulation of capital, the dispersion of risks and the rationalization of management of firms are brought but the weakness of free competition-one of the fundamental principles of capitalism, the abuse of dominative power in markets, the ineffective of the economy and the inequality of income distribution are caused by monopolization and oligopolization due to mergers.
    In Korea, according to the constitutional provision "monopolistic and oligopolistic practices shall be properly regulated and coordinate" (Art. 120. (3) of Constitution). The act concerning restriction of monopoly and maintenance of fair trade is enacted in 1980 and put in force from 1981. This law provides that any special firm shall not effect a merger in either of the following cases, "where the effect of a merger may be substantially restrain competition in any particular field of trade" or where unfair methods of practices have been employed in the course of the merger." Here we assume an effective competition, not a perfect competition.
    Our antitrust policy is not a perfect and satisfactory one but it has a lot of problems. Our legislative policy is the method of post-regulation system and so, to eliminate the evils afferwards if evils accrued from mergers. This policy is reasonable under our industrial structure, I think. But under our Antitrust Act, the conglomerate merger could not regulated. In the legistration to come, this point shall be considered, I believe.



    번역하기

    Monopolistic and oligopolistic through merger is one of the most controversial problems in modern economic life. As a result of Mergers, the economies of large Scale, accumulation of capital, the dispersion of risks and the rationalization of manageme...

    Monopolistic and oligopolistic through merger is one of the most controversial problems in modern economic life. As a result of Mergers, the economies of large Scale, accumulation of capital, the dispersion of risks and the rationalization of management of firms are brought but the weakness of free competition-one of the fundamental principles of capitalism, the abuse of dominative power in markets, the ineffective of the economy and the inequality of income distribution are caused by monopolization and oligopolization due to mergers.
    In Korea, according to the constitutional provision "monopolistic and oligopolistic practices shall be properly regulated and coordinate" (Art. 120. (3) of Constitution). The act concerning restriction of monopoly and maintenance of fair trade is enacted in 1980 and put in force from 1981. This law provides that any special firm shall not effect a merger in either of the following cases, "where the effect of a merger may be substantially restrain competition in any particular field of trade" or where unfair methods of practices have been employed in the course of the merger." Here we assume an effective competition, not a perfect competition.
    Our antitrust policy is not a perfect and satisfactory one but it has a lot of problems. Our legislative policy is the method of post-regulation system and so, to eliminate the evils afferwards if evils accrued from mergers. This policy is reasonable under our industrial structure, I think. But under our Antitrust Act, the conglomerate merger could not regulated. In the legistration to come, this point shall be considered, I believe.



    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 序論
    • Ⅱ. 企業結合의 態樣
    • Ⅲ. 企業結合規制에 대한 論議 및 法的 制度
    • Ⅳ. 外國의 立法例와 우리 法과의 比較檢討
    • Ⅴ. 우리나라 企業結合 規制制度
    • Ⅰ. 序論
    • Ⅱ. 企業結合의 態樣
    • Ⅲ. 企業結合規制에 대한 論議 및 法的 制度
    • Ⅳ. 外國의 立法例와 우리 法과의 比較檢討
    • Ⅴ. 우리나라 企業結合 規制制度
    • Ⅵ. 結論
    • 參考文獻
    • Summary
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼