RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      미국 캘리포니아 주의 강제집행절차 실무연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99972547

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In this research I explained state of California civil execution practice and it covers mainly procedural issues regarding public auction sales. The study may be summarized as follows. The sheriff serves civil processes in the manner prescribed by law and performs civil enforcement duties with integrity and without prejudice or bias in accordance with local, state, and federal laws and statutes. The sheriffs role in civil enforcement is that of a neutral party, acting only on a lawful court order. The majority of procedures and laws governing the service and execution of civil process are set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure.
      The sheriff works in conjunction with the civil courts in specific county and civil courts throughout the state of California in the execution and service of process. It is the goal of the Civil Enforcement Bureau (CEB) is to serve civil processes in a timely manner while maintaining an impartial position between all parties involved.
      All requests for service or levy must include a signed letter of instruction by either the plaintiff or his/her attorney, the appropriate number of copies and the required service fees. There are no fees for the service of restraining orders related to domestic violence, elder abuse, workplace violence and some orders involving civil harassment. Letters of instruction must be complete and include a physical address of where the service is to be made. The CEB does not conduct any investigative tactics such as stakeouts or computer inquiries (DMV, arrest records, etc.) in order to affect service.
      Although the sheriff provides a cost effective, credible service and successfully serves most defendants, there are many variables to consider when requesting service. Some of these variables may delay, or in some cases, even prevent successful service. In some cases, the individual the civil detectives attempting to serve may evade service or is not available during normal business hours. The sheriffs normal hours of service are weekdays within business hours. The civil detectives will make a minimum of two attempts on different days, at different times each day. In these cases where the subject is unavailable for service, it may be in the best interest of the party to consider the services of a private process server.
      The explanation in this piece only deals with California practice of civil execution. Therefore, all the contents of this papers may not be fit with some other state of U.S. jurisdictions situation. I agree those texts are valuable and I completely respect such argument. However, the lesson of this article is the first introduction of U.S. execution system.
      번역하기

      In this research I explained state of California civil execution practice and it covers mainly procedural issues regarding public auction sales. The study may be summarized as follows. The sheriff serves civil processes in the manner prescribed by law...

      In this research I explained state of California civil execution practice and it covers mainly procedural issues regarding public auction sales. The study may be summarized as follows. The sheriff serves civil processes in the manner prescribed by law and performs civil enforcement duties with integrity and without prejudice or bias in accordance with local, state, and federal laws and statutes. The sheriffs role in civil enforcement is that of a neutral party, acting only on a lawful court order. The majority of procedures and laws governing the service and execution of civil process are set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure.
      The sheriff works in conjunction with the civil courts in specific county and civil courts throughout the state of California in the execution and service of process. It is the goal of the Civil Enforcement Bureau (CEB) is to serve civil processes in a timely manner while maintaining an impartial position between all parties involved.
      All requests for service or levy must include a signed letter of instruction by either the plaintiff or his/her attorney, the appropriate number of copies and the required service fees. There are no fees for the service of restraining orders related to domestic violence, elder abuse, workplace violence and some orders involving civil harassment. Letters of instruction must be complete and include a physical address of where the service is to be made. The CEB does not conduct any investigative tactics such as stakeouts or computer inquiries (DMV, arrest records, etc.) in order to affect service.
      Although the sheriff provides a cost effective, credible service and successfully serves most defendants, there are many variables to consider when requesting service. Some of these variables may delay, or in some cases, even prevent successful service. In some cases, the individual the civil detectives attempting to serve may evade service or is not available during normal business hours. The sheriffs normal hours of service are weekdays within business hours. The civil detectives will make a minimum of two attempts on different days, at different times each day. In these cases where the subject is unavailable for service, it may be in the best interest of the party to consider the services of a private process server.
      The explanation in this piece only deals with California practice of civil execution. Therefore, all the contents of this papers may not be fit with some other state of U.S. jurisdictions situation. I agree those texts are valuable and I completely respect such argument. However, the lesson of this article is the first introduction of U.S. execution system.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 국문초록
      • I. 서론
      • II. 강제집행의 요건
      • Ⅲ. 강제집행의 실행절차
      • Ⅳ. 강제집행의 방식
      • 국문초록
      • I. 서론
      • II. 강제집행의 요건
      • Ⅲ. 강제집행의 실행절차
      • Ⅳ. 강제집행의 방식
      • V. 결론 및 시사점
      • 참고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "헌법재판소 2002. 6. 27. 2000헌마642, 2001헌바12(병합) 전원재판부 [부동산중개업법 제15조 등 위헌확인] [헌공 제70호]"

      2 법무부, "프랑스의 사법제도" 715-721, 1997

      3 이제호, "프랑스 민사소송에 있어서의 레페레(Refere)"

      4 오수원, "프랑스 강제집행법중의 우선주의, 민사법의 실천적과제: 閑道 정환담교수 화갑기념" 법문사 225-238, 2000

      5 오수원, "프랑스 강제집행법 서설" 20 (20): 315-, 2000

      6 법원행정처, "집행관 감독지침, 법원행정처 사법행정 간행물"

      7 이재영, "집달관에 대한 제도적 고찰과 개혁에 관한 소고" 11 : 193-232, 1984

      8 박영원, "전자입찰과 청렴도 관계에 관한 실증분석-중앙정부와 지방자치단체를 중심으로" 한국조달연구원 2006

      9 한기춘, "영국에서의 금전채권에 관한 판결의 강제집행 : High Court에서의 집행방법을 중심으로"

      10 법원행정처, "사법연감" 2010

      1 "헌법재판소 2002. 6. 27. 2000헌마642, 2001헌바12(병합) 전원재판부 [부동산중개업법 제15조 등 위헌확인] [헌공 제70호]"

      2 법무부, "프랑스의 사법제도" 715-721, 1997

      3 이제호, "프랑스 민사소송에 있어서의 레페레(Refere)"

      4 오수원, "프랑스 강제집행법중의 우선주의, 민사법의 실천적과제: 閑道 정환담교수 화갑기념" 법문사 225-238, 2000

      5 오수원, "프랑스 강제집행법 서설" 20 (20): 315-, 2000

      6 법원행정처, "집행관 감독지침, 법원행정처 사법행정 간행물"

      7 이재영, "집달관에 대한 제도적 고찰과 개혁에 관한 소고" 11 : 193-232, 1984

      8 박영원, "전자입찰과 청렴도 관계에 관한 실증분석-중앙정부와 지방자치단체를 중심으로" 한국조달연구원 2006

      9 한기춘, "영국에서의 금전채권에 관한 판결의 강제집행 : High Court에서의 집행방법을 중심으로"

      10 법원행정처, "사법연감" 2010

      11 신봉환, "부동산경매제도의 개선방안에 관한 법적 연구" 동아대학교 대학원 2011

      12 이재호, "부동산 경매에 있어서 유치권의 문제점과 개선방안 : 집행관의 현황조사보고의 문제점을 중심으로" 대구대학교 행정대학원 2008

      13 김상철, "미국의 사법제도상 집행관의 지위"

      14 이성호, "미국법상 담보권실행 및 강제집행절차와 채권자의 청구금액 확장에 관한 문제" 46 (46): 31-68, 1997

      15 김인호, "독일의 사법제도 소고 : 법관 아닌 사법기관을 중심으로" 38 (38): 103-119, 1989

      16 정재오, "독일 최고법원의 재판실무현황" 한국사법행정학회 6 : 402-, 2008

      17 호문혁, "독일 강제집행법에 관한 연구" 41 (41): 123-146, 2001

      18 John Fellas, "with the Assistance of Aoi Inoue Hughes Hubbard & Reed, LLP, Selected Materials in International Litigation and Arbitration, Practising Law Institute International Arbitration 2011 PLI Order No. 30336 New York City"

      19 Henrik Lando, "the Enforcement of Specific Performance in Civil Law Countries" 2004

      20 Jason J. Kilborn, "The Innovative German Approach to Consumer Debt Relief: Revolutionary Changes in German Law, and Surprising Lessons for the United States" (Winter) : 2004

      21 Rogers, W. H., "The Impact of Foreclosures on Neighboring Housing Sales" 31 (31): 455-479, 2009

      22 Henry Royston Loyn, "The Governance of Anglo-Saxon England, 500-1087" Stanford Univ. Press 1984

      23 Stefan A. Risenfield, "The Formative Era of American Public Assistance Law" 43 : 175-, 1955

      24 Wendy Kennett, "The Enforcement of Judgments in Europe"

      25 Nick Timiraos, "Reviews Begin for Borrowers Disputing Foreclosures"

      26 Ken Philip, "Receivership : A Value-Adding Tool" 63 (63): 30-34, 2007

      27 Gerry Maher, "Provisional and Protective Remedies, The British Experience of the Brussels' Convention" 48 : 302-, 1999

      28 Wendy Kennett, "Procedural Laws in Europe towards Harmonisation" 81-, 2003

      29 Denis Clifford, "Plan Your Estate" 7-10, 2008

      30 Alexander Kazhdan, "Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium" Oxford Univ. Press 1140-, 1991

      31 Peter Kaye, "Methods of Execution of Orders and Judgments in Europe"

      32 William T. Tanner, "How to Collect Your Judgment, Directing Attorney, Legal Aid, Orange County"

      33 John Caulfield, "Florida Courts Can Now Conduct Foreclosure Sales Online"

      34 Neil Andrews, "English Civil Procedure–Fundamentals of the New Civil Justice System"

      35 Ian Macdonald, "Bailiff Powers and Civil Judgment Enforcement"

      36 Theodore Frank Thomas Plucknett, "A Concise of History of Common Law"

      37 Peter Vronsky, "A Brief History of Constables in the English Speaking World"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2025 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2018-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-05-06 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국법이론실무학회 -> 사단법인 한국법이론실무학회
      영문명 : The Korean Society for Legal Theory and Practice -> The Korea Society for Legal Theory and Practice Inc.
      2015-01-08 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국법률실무학회 -> 한국법이론실무학회
      영문명 : KOREA ACADEMY OF JUDICIAL AFFAIRS -> The Korean Society for Legal Theory and Practice
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.57 0.57 0.53
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0.699 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼