RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      농촌디자인 평가 방법에 관한 연구 : 시간적 개념을 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14732279

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        전주: 전북대학교 일반대학원, 2018

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(박사) -- 전북대학교 일반대학원 , 디자인제조공학과 , 2018. 2

      • 발행연도

        2018

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • 발행국(도시)

        전북특별자치도

      • 기타서명

        A Study on Rural Design Evaluation Methods : Focusing on Temporal Concepts

      • 형태사항

        ix, 93 p.: 삽화, 표; 26 cm

      • 일반주기명

        권말에 설문지 수록
        전북대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
        지도교수: 조광수
        참고문헌 : p. 81-84

      • 소장기관
        • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
        • 전북대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study is on the evaluation methods of rural designs. For this, the concept of rural design and theories on subjective temporal characteristics were identified in the theoretical considerations. The characteristics of subjective time are the psychological processes of visitors found in the need of research, and change in emotions were identified linked with the flow of time to understand repeated psychological processes such as emotional experiences and psychological changes, positive attitude formed through psychological exchanges, etc. with the correlation with satisfaction according to the change of time.
      Next, in order to identify research trends related to this study, trends related to design research, rural resource systematization classification trends, research trends related to agriculture and design, and evaluation trends related to rural policy projects were identified. First, in trends related to design research, research documents on design were organized and the categories were classified. Second, in the rural resource systemization classification trends, the existing rural resources were reorganized through systematic classification. Third, in research trends related to agriculture and design, existing agricultural design fields were classified per design category and rural resource systemization classification, and the agricultural research sector was classified per sector, method and contents to identify research trends. Lastly, evaluation trends related to rural policy projects were identified to understand the flow of rural policy evaluations.
      In order to develop the rural design evaluation method, rural design evaluation factors were extracted and satisfaction evaluation formulas linked to time were arranged to propose rural design evaluation methods. A total of 13 rural design evaluation elements were extracted for this, and they are functionality (usability), local identify (culture), aesthetics, scenery, accessibility, utilization, pleasantness (comfort), safety, education, sustainability (maintenance), community, constructability (facilities), and integration. The relationship of rural design evaluation elements and design categories were identified to organize each element corresponding to style, service and system with a Venn diagram. Based on this, satisfaction evaluation formulas were combined connected to rural design evaluation elements and time to compare and evaluate each town more easily and independently than by evaluating through an institute, and to propose an evaluation method that can be used as a self-evaluation index needed for setting goals, etc.
      The developed rural design evaluation methods were used to comprise the rural experience evaluation team and values found through experiences in two rural experience towns were applied to the formula. In result, it was possible to generally digitize experiences at rural experience towns by linking with rural design elements, and was used to make it possible to compare towns.
      번역하기

      This study is on the evaluation methods of rural designs. For this, the concept of rural design and theories on subjective temporal characteristics were identified in the theoretical considerations. The characteristics of subjective time are the psych...

      This study is on the evaluation methods of rural designs. For this, the concept of rural design and theories on subjective temporal characteristics were identified in the theoretical considerations. The characteristics of subjective time are the psychological processes of visitors found in the need of research, and change in emotions were identified linked with the flow of time to understand repeated psychological processes such as emotional experiences and psychological changes, positive attitude formed through psychological exchanges, etc. with the correlation with satisfaction according to the change of time.
      Next, in order to identify research trends related to this study, trends related to design research, rural resource systematization classification trends, research trends related to agriculture and design, and evaluation trends related to rural policy projects were identified. First, in trends related to design research, research documents on design were organized and the categories were classified. Second, in the rural resource systemization classification trends, the existing rural resources were reorganized through systematic classification. Third, in research trends related to agriculture and design, existing agricultural design fields were classified per design category and rural resource systemization classification, and the agricultural research sector was classified per sector, method and contents to identify research trends. Lastly, evaluation trends related to rural policy projects were identified to understand the flow of rural policy evaluations.
      In order to develop the rural design evaluation method, rural design evaluation factors were extracted and satisfaction evaluation formulas linked to time were arranged to propose rural design evaluation methods. A total of 13 rural design evaluation elements were extracted for this, and they are functionality (usability), local identify (culture), aesthetics, scenery, accessibility, utilization, pleasantness (comfort), safety, education, sustainability (maintenance), community, constructability (facilities), and integration. The relationship of rural design evaluation elements and design categories were identified to organize each element corresponding to style, service and system with a Venn diagram. Based on this, satisfaction evaluation formulas were combined connected to rural design evaluation elements and time to compare and evaluate each town more easily and independently than by evaluating through an institute, and to propose an evaluation method that can be used as a self-evaluation index needed for setting goals, etc.
      The developed rural design evaluation methods were used to comprise the rural experience evaluation team and values found through experiences in two rural experience towns were applied to the formula. In result, it was possible to generally digitize experiences at rural experience towns by linking with rural design elements, and was used to make it possible to compare towns.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제1장 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 배경 1
      • 1.1 연구의 필요성 1
      • 1.2. 연구의 목적 8
      • 2. 연구의 방법 및 범위 11
      • 제1장 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 배경 1
      • 1.1 연구의 필요성 1
      • 1.2. 연구의 목적 8
      • 2. 연구의 방법 및 범위 11
      • 2.1. 연구의 방법 11
      • 2.2. 연구의 범위 12
      • 제2장 이론적 고찰 14
      • 1. 이론적 배경 14
      • 1.1. 농촌디자인의 개념 14
      • 1.2. 주관적 시간 특징에 관한 기본 이론 15
      • 1.3. 소결 23
      • 2. 관련 연구 동향 25
      • 2.1. 디자인 관련 연구 동향 25
      • 2.2. 농촌자원분류 관련 연구 동향 26
      • 2.3. 농업과 디자인 관련 연구 동향 29
      • 2.4. 시사점 39
      • 3. 농촌 정책 사업 관련 평가 동향 41
      • 3.1. 농촌의 정책 변화 동향 41
      • 3.2. 농촌 사업의 시행체계 43
      • 3.3. 기존 농촌사업의 평가지표 46
      • 3.4. 현재의 농촌 정책 49
      • 3.5. 농촌 사업의 문제점 51
      • 3.6. 시사점 51
      • 제3장 농촌 디자인 평가 방법 개발 53
      • 1. 연구 내용 및 방법 53
      • 2. 연구 결과 53
      • 2.1. 농촌디자인 평가 요소 추출 53
      • 2.2. 시간과 연계한 만족도 평가 적용을 위한 방법 59
      • 2.3. 농촌체험마을 평가 공식 61
      • 3. 소결 62
      • 제4장 농촌 디자인 평가 방법 적용 64
      • 1. 연구 내용 및 방법 64
      • 2. 연구 결과 64
      • 2.1. 농촌 체험마을 비교 평가 64
      • 2.2. 농촌체험마을 비교 평가 결과 종합 75
      • 3. 소결 77
      • 제5장 결론 78
      • 1. 연구결과 요약 및 한계점 78
      • 참고문헌 81
      • 설문지 85
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼