慣習法上의 法定地上權 = Legal Superficies in Customary Law

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Our civil code, unlike the legislation of European countries which is based on the principle of Roman law, regard the land and building as a separate and independent real estate. According to this, There is a situatio n of change where the land and building is belong to different person. In addition, An owner of a building have no opportunity to contract for ma king use of land. If an owner of a building does not have the right to u se of land like as superficies, the right to rent a house and lease, and so on, then his building should be removed.
Does this building which is loss of a foundation shall be cleared away?
It is used to be thought that this situation is absurdity from the point of view of law-effect and economy. Thus, in order to rectificate this problem, the existing law permit the right of legal superficies for the owner of building at our civil code §366 and §305. That is, Where the land and t he building belongs to different person after the official auction sale of th e property mortgaged, the owner Of the land is seemd to have created a superficies for the owner of the building and when the owner of the land is altered after the building was sett-ed up the right of the rent, in addition, the law of a standing tree(§6Q①), provisional regisiration mortgage, etc.(§10), a security of factory(§31①), a foundation security of mining (§5). By the way, unlikely civil code and these particular law, there is so called legal superficies in custom what is now generally considered as on e of the most epoch-making decisions in the history of korean judical precedents, the Chosun High Court ruled on September 29th. 1919.
This means that when the land and the building which have been in t he possession of one and the same person is spilt between different pers on by means of sale or other methods in the future, if there is no previo us special contract, then the owner of the building is acquired the legal superficies in customary law to the owner of the land. Because legal superficies is perrnitted by an civil code to a specific proviso, there is no denunciation. But legal superficies in customary law, the other way, has many question whether or not about the pertinence. By the way, on the other hand a real condition, since then many judical precedents about this right have been accumulated and made fixed the POsition from the viewpoint of the conventional law.
By this cause, this paper attempt to theoretical setting by work on t he study about an angle of vision of the conventional law and present direction in law-making political side with an opinion of theory. So, for t his aim, in chapter I , I made a short sketch about this paper's object, range, method, etc. In chapter II , reasearched the institutional significance about the legal superficies in customary law. In chapter Ⅲ,Ⅳ,Ⅴ,Ⅵ, investigated material condition, contents, institutional registration, opposing power, disposition, etc. In conclusion ChapterⅦ, attempt-ed to betterment the same institution's directions and theoretical repletion.
This paper inquire into centering around the judical precedent, futher more refer the literature on this subject by combination documentary met hod of study and that of law-interpretation.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• 第Ⅰ章 序論 = 1
• 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 3
• 第Ⅱ章 慣習法上 法定地上權의 基礎理論 = 5
• 第1節 序說 = 5
• 第2節 制度的 妥當性 = 7
• 1. 妥當性 肯定論 = 8
• 2. 妥當性 否定論 = 9
• 第3節 理論的 根據 = 11
• 1. 慣習法論 = 11
• 2. 『法院에 의한 形成』 理論 = 12
• 3. 民法 第305條 類推適用論 = 13
• 第Ⅲ章 慣習法上 法定地上權의 成立要件 = 15
• 第1節 序說 = 15
• 第2節 成立要件 = 15
• 1. 土地와 建物이 同一人의 所有에 속하였을 것 = 15
• 1) 同一所有 = 16
• (1) 名義信託이나 讓渡擔保의 경우 = 16
• (2) 土地 또는 建物이 共有인 경우 = 17
• (3) 假登記의 경우 = 22
• 2) 同一所有의 時期 = 24
• 2. 賣買 其他의 原因으로 土地와 建物의 所有者가 달라졌을 것 = 26
• 1) 賣買 其他의 原因 = 27
• (1) 判例가 인정하고 있는 原因行爲 = 27
• (2) 判例가 인정하고 있지 아니한 原因行爲 = 35
• (3) 原因行爲의 適法性 與否 = 36
• 2) 土地와 建物의 所有者가 달라질 것 = 36
• 3. 當事者間에 建物을 撤去한다는 特約이 없을 것 = 37
• 1) 建物撤去 特約의 有無 = 37
• (1) 慣習法上 法定地上權을 抛棄한 경우 = 37
• (2) 慣習法上 法定地上權을 抛棄한 것으로 볼 수 없는 경우 = 40
• (3) 建物撤去請求와 信義則 = 41
• 2) 立證責任 = 42
• 第Ⅳ章 慣習法上 法定地上權의 內容 = 44
• 第1節 序說 = 44
• 第2節 範圍 = 45
• 第3節 存讀期間 = 48
• 第4節 地料 = 50
• 第Ⅴ章 慣習法上 法定地上權의 設定登記와 對抗力 = 57
• 第1節 序說 = 57
• 第2節 慣習法上 法定地上權의 設定登記 = 57
• 1. 設定證記請求權의 性質 = 57
• 2. 設定登記의 相對方 = 58
• 第3節 慣習法上 法定地上權의 對抗力 = 59
• 1. 舊民法施行當時 취득한 慣習法上 法定地上權의 對抗力 = 59
• 2. 現行民法施行後 취득한 慣習法上 法定地上權의 對抗力 = 60
• 第Ⅵ章 慣習法上 法定地上權의 處分 = 62
• 第1節 序說 = 62
• 第2節 未證記取得者의 法的地位와 權利의 競合 = 62
• 1. 未登記取得者의 代位請求 = 62
• 2. 讓受人의 占有할 權利 = 63
• 3. 土地所有者의 建物撤去請求와 建物讓受人의 代位權行使의 競合 = 64
• 1) 代位權 優位說 = 65
• 2) 撤去請求權 優位說 = 66
• 3) 判例의 態度 = 67
• 第Ⅶ章 結論 = 69
• 參考文獻 = 72
• ABSTRACT = 75