창의성 신장을 위한 초등 시 쓰기 과제 구성 연구 = A Study on the Composition of Poetry Writing Assignment in Elementary School for Enhancing Creativity

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study was started from the question of how to compose poetry writing assignment in order to enhance elementary school learners’ creativity. One of main reasons for having learners write poems in Korean language education may be to provide them with experiences in creative uses of the language. Poetry writing is also related with the development of abilities to appreciate literary works and ‘the enhancement of creativity,’ which is one of general purposes of education. Accordingly, poetry writing assignment for elementary school learners needs to be composed not only in connection to special knowledge or competence in the ‘literature’ domain but also in a way of satisfying requirements for general creativity.
In the creativity theory, task motivation means the learners’ interest in a task or their inner motive for achieving creative outcomes, and the level of creativity may be different according to what is demanded by the task to be performed by learners. If assignments are composed from a hybrid position that consider both the domain‐specificity and the domain‐generality of creativity at the same time so that they may meet requirements for the training of creative thinking and the specificity of poetry writing, they will increase the possibility for the transference of creativity, which learners display while carrying out children’s poetry writing assignment, to other domains, and at the same time, strengthen learners’ abilities to write poems.
According to the results of analyzing poetry writing assignments presented in the “Writing” textbooks the 1st graders under the current National Korean Language Curriculum, most of the assignments demanded imitation or adaptation and emphasized formative characteristics of poetry, so had a limitation in stimulating creative thinking. In order to solve these problems, the composition of poetry writing assignments should follow principles as follows. First, information on creative process should be provided. Second, conventional learning of poetry focusing on form should be supplemented with the training of ‘poetic thinking.’ Third, social interaction among the learners should be encouraged in the process of writing and evaluating children’s poems.
These results of this study have the limitation that they may shrink the meaning of poetry writing as education of creative writing, but can contribute to the improvement of curriculums and textbooks related to poetry writing in a way of achieving the enhancement of creativity, one of the general goals of education.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 유영희, "현대시교육론" 사회평론 2010

2 김근호, "허구 서사 창작 교육 연구" 서울대학교 2009

3 김정섭, "한국 창의성 연구의 동향과 쟁점" 한국교육심리학회 22 (22): 939-960, 2008

4 Torrance,E, "토랜스의 창의성과 교육(Why Fly?：A Philosophy of Creativity)" 학지사 2005

5 정정순, "초등학교 쓰기 교육에서의 동시 창작 교육의 방향" 한국어문교육학회 (32) : 2006

6 문학과문학교육연구소, "창작교육,어떻게 할 것인가" 푸른사상 2001

7 민지연, "창의적 교실 분위기와 창의성 및 동기간의 관계" 한국교육심리학회 23 (23): 787-800, 2009

8 Sternberg,R.J., "창의성：그 잠재력의 실현을 위하여(Creativity：From Potential to Realization)" 학지사 2009

9 Csikszentmihalyi, "창의성의 즐거움(Creativity：Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention)" 북로드 2003

10 정종진, "창의성에 대한 다원적 접근과 그 교육적 시사" 대구교육대학교 초등교육연구소 18 (18): 2003

11 유영희, "이미지로 보는 시 창작교육론" 역락 2003

12 전인숙, "쓰기 과제의 수사적 요소 구체화가 쓰기 수행에 미치는 영향" 고려대학교 2011

13 김정자, "쓰기 과제 구성에 대한 연구" 한말연구학회 (15) : 93-120, 2004

14 서수현, "쓰기 과제 구성 요소의 설정에 대한 연구" 국어교육학회 (33) : 449-472, 2008

15 이지호, "시？동시？어린이시" 한국문학교육학회 (12) : 245-278, 2003

16 정정순, "시적 형상성의 교육 내용 연구" 서울대학교 2005

17 염성렬, "생활체험 묘사를 통한 시 쓰기 지도 방법 연구" 광주교육대학교 2008

18 Root-Bernstein, "생각의 탄생(Spark of Genius)" 에코의서재 2007

19 차재연, "동시 창작 지도 방법 연구" 춘천교육대학교 2006

20 김성진, "글쓰기에서 관습과 창의성의 관계에 대한 연구 - 현기영의 거룩한 생애에 나타난 전(傳) 양식 활용을 중심으로 -" 국어교육학회 (16) : 2003

21 김미혜, "국어적 창의성의 구성 요소에 관한 연구" 국어교육학회 (20) : 333-356, 2004

22 이재승, "과정 중심 쓰기 교육의 구현 방안" 청람어문교육 학회 (20) : 1998

23 황미향, "과정 중심 쓰기 교육에 대한 비판적 고찰" 한국어교육학회 (123) : 243-278, 2007