RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    고등교육기관평가의 신뢰도와 타당도에 관련된 문제점 분석 = (A) study on the reliability and validity of institutional evaluation in higher education

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9989505

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : 동국대학교 대학원, 1999

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 동국대학교 대학원 , 교육학과 , 1999. 8

    • 발행연도

      1999

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      377.1 판사항(4)

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 형태사항

      ⅱ, 108p. : 삽도 ; 26cm.

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌: p. 101-106

    • 소장기관
      • 한국학중앙연구원 한국학도서관 소장기관정보
      • 호남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The goal of this study is to analyze the reliability and validity of institutional evaluation in higher education and to show the relevant problems in Korea.
    In order to realize the goal of this study, this article included the following contents :
    First, the definition and the reliability, the validity, the model of institutional evaluation in higher education were explored.
    Second, the condition of institutional evaluation of higher education in foreign countries were explored. And the technical, procedural method to raise the reliability and validity of foreign countries were explored.
    Third, as a case study about the institutional evaluation in higher education of foreign countries, the evaluation system and procedure etc of CACREP (The Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs in U.S.A) were explored.
    Finally, these problems which were relevant to the reliability and validity of institutional evaluation in higher education and the ways to reform those problems were suggested in Korea.
    In conclusion, institutional evaluation in higher education was required to reform in Korea. To reform the problems, The procedure, method, system and the application of evaluation outcome should be reformed. And the method which was to inform institutional evaluation in higher education and outcome should be reformed. And it needs that theoretical study should be activated.
    번역하기

    The goal of this study is to analyze the reliability and validity of institutional evaluation in higher education and to show the relevant problems in Korea. In order to realize the goal of this study, this article included the following contents : ...

    The goal of this study is to analyze the reliability and validity of institutional evaluation in higher education and to show the relevant problems in Korea.
    In order to realize the goal of this study, this article included the following contents :
    First, the definition and the reliability, the validity, the model of institutional evaluation in higher education were explored.
    Second, the condition of institutional evaluation of higher education in foreign countries were explored. And the technical, procedural method to raise the reliability and validity of foreign countries were explored.
    Third, as a case study about the institutional evaluation in higher education of foreign countries, the evaluation system and procedure etc of CACREP (The Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs in U.S.A) were explored.
    Finally, these problems which were relevant to the reliability and validity of institutional evaluation in higher education and the ways to reform those problems were suggested in Korea.
    In conclusion, institutional evaluation in higher education was required to reform in Korea. To reform the problems, The procedure, method, system and the application of evaluation outcome should be reformed. And the method which was to inform institutional evaluation in higher education and outcome should be reformed. And it needs that theoretical study should be activated.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구내용 = 11
    • 3. 연구문제 = 12
    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구내용 = 11
    • 3. 연구문제 = 12
    • 4. 연구방법 = 13
    • 5. 연구 제한점 = 14
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 17
    • 1. 고등교육기관평가의 정의 = 17
    • 2. 고등교육기관평가의 신뢰도와 타당도 = 20
    • 3. 고등교육기관평가의 모형 = 26
    • Ⅲ. 외국 고등교육기관평가의 신뢰도와 타당도 = 38
    • 1. 외국의 고등교육기관에 대한 평가 현황 = 38
    • 2. 외국 고등교육기관평가의 신뢰도와 타당도 = 42
    • 3. 미국 고등교육평가기관(CACREP)의 평가 사례 = 44
    • Ⅳ. 국내 고등교육기관평가의 신뢰도와 타당도에 관련된 문제점 = 51
    • Ⅴ. 요약 및 논의 = 83
    • 1. 요약 = 83
    • 2. 제언 = 89
    • 참고문헌 = 101
    • ABSTRACT = 107
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼