RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
자동완성 버튼

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력
    あ ぁ か が さ ざ た だ な は ば ぱ ま や ゃ ら わ ゎ ん い ぃ き ぎ し じ ち ぢ に ひ び ぴ み り う ぅ く ぐ す ず つ づ っ ぬ ふ ぶ ぷ む ゆ ゅ る え ぇ け げ せ ぜ て で ね へ べ ぺ め れ お ぉ こ ご そ ぞ と ど の ほ ぼ ぽ も よ ょ ろ を
    ア ァ カ サ ザ タ ダ ナ ハ バ パ マ ヤ ャ ラ ワ ヮ ン イ ィ キ ギ シ ジ チ ヂ ニ ヒ ビ ピ ミ リ ウ ゥ ク グ ス ズ ツ ヅ ッ ヌ フ ブ プ ム ユ ュ ル エ ェ ケ ゲ セ ゼ テ デ ヘ ベ ペ メ レ オ ォ コ ゴ ソ ゾ ト ド ノ ホ ボ ポ モ ヨ ョ ロ ヲ ―

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    ㅥ ㅦ ㅧ ㅨ ㅩ ㅪ ㅫ ㅬ ㅭ ㅮ ㅯ ㅰ ㅱ ㅲ ㅳ ㅴ ㅵ ㅶ ㅷ ㅸ ㅹ ㅺ ㅻ ㅼ ㅽ ㅾ ㅿ ㆀ ㆁ ㆂ ㆃ ㆄ ㆅ ㆆ ㆇ ㆈ ㆉ ㆊ ㆋ ㆌ ㆍ ㆎ
    Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ ν ξ ο π ρ σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω
    á à Á À é è É È ç Ç ê
    Ä Ö Ü ä ö ü ß
    ְ ֳ ֲ ֱ ָ ַ ֵ ֶ ִ ֹ ּ ֻ ׂ ׁ ּ פ ם ן ו ט א ר ק ף ך ל ח י ע כ ג ד ש ץ ת צ מ נ ה ב
    ‘ ’ “ ” 〔 〕 〈 〉 「 」 『 』 【 】 ＂ （ ） ［ ］ ｛ ｝
    ± × ÷ ≠ ≤ ≥ ∞ ∴ ♂ ♀ ∠ ⊥ ⌒ ∂ ∇ ≡ ≒ ≪ ≫ √ ∽ ∝ ∵ ∫ ∬ ∈ ∋ ⊆ ⊇ ⊂ ⊃ ∪ ∩ ∧ ∨ ￢ ⇒ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∮ ∑ ∏ ＋ － ＜ ＝ ＞
    、 。 · ‥ … ¨ 〃 ― ∥ ＼ ∼ ´ ～ ˇ ˘ ˝ ˚ ˙ ¸ ˛ ¡ ¿ ː ！ ＇ ， ． ／ ： ； ？ ＾ ＿ ｀ ｜
    ½ ⅓ ⅔ ¼ ¾ ⅛ ⅜ ⅝ ⅞ ¹ ² ³ ⁴ ⁿ ₁ ₂ ₃ ₄
    Æ Ð Ħ IJ Ł Ø Œ Þ Ŧ Ŋ æ đ ð ħ ı ij ĸ ŀ ł ø œ ß þ ŧ ŋ ʼn
    А Б В Г Д Е Ё Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я а б в г д е ё ж з и й к л м н о п р с т у ф х ц ч ш щ ъ ы ь э ю я
    ′ ″ ℃ Å ￠ ￡ ￥ ¤ ℉ ‰ ＄ ％ Ｆ ￦ ㎕ ㎖ ㎗ ℓ ㎘ ㏄ ㎣ ㎤ ㎥ ㎦ ㎙ ㎚ ㎛ ㎜ ㎝ ㎞ ㎟ ㎠ ㎡ ㎢ ㏊ ㎍ ㎎ ㎏ ㏏ ㎈ ㎉ ㏈ ㎧ ㎨ ㎰ ㎱ ㎲ ㎳ ㎴ ㎵ ㎶ ㎷ ㎸ ㎹ ㎀ ㎁ ㎂ ㎃ ㎄ ㎺ ㎻ ㎽ ㎾ ㎿ ㎐ ㎑ ㎒ ㎓ ㎔ Ω ㏀ ㏁ ㎊ ㎋ ㎌ ㏖ ㏅ ㎭ ㎮ ㎯ ㏛ ㎩ ㎪ ㎫ ㎬ ㏝ ㏐ ㏓ ㏃ ㏉ ㏜ ㏆
    § ※ ☆ ★ ○ ● ◎ ◇ ◆ □ ■ △ ▽ → ← ↑ ↓ ↔ 〓 ◁ ◀ ▷ ▶ ♤ ♠ ♡ ♥ ♧ ♣ ⊙ ◈ ▣ ◐ ◑ ▒ ▤ ▥ ▨ ▧ ▦ ▩ ♨ ☏ ☎ ☜ ☞ † ‡ ↕ ↗ ↙ ↖ ↘ ♭ ♩ ♪ ♬ ㉿ ㈜ № ㏇ ™ ㏂ ㏘ ℡ ＃ ＆ ＊ ＠ ª º
    ⅰ ⅱ ⅲ ⅳ ⅴ ⅵ ⅶ ⅷ ⅸ ⅹ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ
    ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک ل م ن ه و ی
    닫기

    맞벌이부부 가족의 노부모 부양행동에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구 : 사회교환이론 및 가족주의가치관을 중심으로 = A study on factors influencing caregiving behavior for older parents of dual-earner families : focused of the social exchange theory and familism

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10236490

    • 0

      상세조회

    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    영어
    한국어
    Purposes: This study aims to explore whether the social exchange theory and familism can explain caregiving behavior for older parents of dual-earner families by verifying the social exchange theory which claims that as rewards are superior to costs, caregiving behavior increases. More specifically, we explore whether rewards and costs for supporting old parents and their familism influence on caregiving behavior of dual-earner families.

    Methods: A survey for this study was carried out over married couples living Seoul and Metropolitan area who have parents of age above 60 and at least one child. The survey was accomplished from January to April 2005. Two hundred forty questionnaires were distributed among them 187 were collected and finally total 164 questionnaires were used in analysis. We use frequency analysis and multiple regression analysis as well as hierarchical multiple regression analysis method.

    Results: Outcomes of this study can be summarized by 6 results:
    First of all, factors influencing economic caregiving behavior for older parents were emotional reward and service cost. As perceiving more emotional rewards and more service costs, economic caregiving behavior increased.
    Secondly, factors influencing emotional caregiving behavior were emotional reward and service reward, economic cost. As perceiving more emotional and service rewards and less economic costs, emotional caregiving behavior increased.
    Thirdly, familism didn't influence all caregiving behavior for older parents of dual-earner families. Therefore, in this study, familism was not adequate factor explaining caregiving behavior for older parents of modern dual-earner families.
    Finally, emotional and service rewards influenced every caregiving behavior except economic caregiving behavior showing that emotional reward is most important factor in caregiving older parents.

    Implications: The point of this research is that targets of survey are both husbands and wives so that common opinions of married couples were looked over.
    Moreover, this study recognized limit that mutually different areas, such as reward and cost, can not be compared directly. Therefore we used indirect verification method of the social exchange theory. In verifying the social exchange theory thereby, this study revealed the necessity of more stringent measure and methodology.
    Further, by finding out factors influencing caregiving behavior for older parents of dual-earner families, this study offered basic data making systemic and practical alternatives to increase caregiving behavior for older parents of dual-earner families.
    Finally, familism of modern dual-earner families is so weak and becomes gradually fainter. Therefore, familism can not be a major factors in caregiving behavior for older parents. This study is also very suggestive in relation to the elderly caregiving support policy hereafter by finding out that caregiving aspects of Korean married adult-children have been westernized gradually.
    번역하기

    Purposes: This study aims to explore whether the social exchange theory and familism can explain caregiving behavior for older parents of dual-earner families by verifying the social exchange theory which claims that as rewards are superior to costs, ...

    Purposes: This study aims to explore whether the social exchange theory and familism can explain caregiving behavior for older parents of dual-earner families by verifying the social exchange theory which claims that as rewards are superior to costs, caregiving behavior increases. More specifically, we explore whether rewards and costs for supporting old parents and their familism influence on caregiving behavior of dual-earner families.

    Methods: A survey for this study was carried out over married couples living Seoul and Metropolitan area who have parents of age above 60 and at least one child. The survey was accomplished from January to April 2005. Two hundred forty questionnaires were distributed among them 187 were collected and finally total 164 questionnaires were used in analysis. We use frequency analysis and multiple regression analysis as well as hierarchical multiple regression analysis method.

    Results: Outcomes of this study can be summarized by 6 results:
    First of all, factors influencing economic caregiving behavior for older parents were emotional reward and service cost. As perceiving more emotional rewards and more service costs, economic caregiving behavior increased.
    Secondly, factors influencing emotional caregiving behavior were emotional reward and service reward, economic cost. As perceiving more emotional and service rewards and less economic costs, emotional caregiving behavior increased.
    Thirdly, familism didn't influence all caregiving behavior for older parents of dual-earner families. Therefore, in this study, familism was not adequate factor explaining caregiving behavior for older parents of modern dual-earner families.
    Finally, emotional and service rewards influenced every caregiving behavior except economic caregiving behavior showing that emotional reward is most important factor in caregiving older parents.

    Implications: The point of this research is that targets of survey are both husbands and wives so that common opinions of married couples were looked over.
    Moreover, this study recognized limit that mutually different areas, such as reward and cost, can not be compared directly. Therefore we used indirect verification method of the social exchange theory. In verifying the social exchange theory thereby, this study revealed the necessity of more stringent measure and methodology.
    Further, by finding out factors influencing caregiving behavior for older parents of dual-earner families, this study offered basic data making systemic and practical alternatives to increase caregiving behavior for older parents of dual-earner families.
    Finally, familism of modern dual-earner families is so weak and becomes gradually fainter. Therefore, familism can not be a major factors in caregiving behavior for older parents. This study is also very suggestive in relation to the elderly caregiving support policy hereafter by finding out that caregiving aspects of Korean married adult-children have been westernized gradually.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제 1 장 서론 = 1
    • 제 1 절 문제제기 = 1
    • 제 2 절 연구목적 및 의의 = 7
    • 제 2 장 이론적 배경 = 8
    • 제 1 절 사회교환이론 관점에서의 노부모부양 = 8
    • 제 1 장 서론 = 1
    • 제 1 절 문제제기 = 1
    • 제 2 절 연구목적 및 의의 = 7
    • 제 2 장 이론적 배경 = 8
    • 제 1 절 사회교환이론 관점에서의 노부모부양 = 8
    • 1. 사회교환이론의 개념 = 8
    • 2. 사회교환이론 관점에서의 노부모-기혼자녀 관계 = 9
    • 3. 맞벌이부부의 노인부양 = 14
    • 4. 노부모부양에 따른 보상 및 비용 = 17
    • 제 2 절 가족주의가치관 = 21
    • 1. 가족주의가치관의 개념 = 21
    • 2. 가족주의가치관의 변화 = 22
    • 3. 가족주의가치관과 노부모부양 = 24
    • 제 3 절 부양행동 = 26
    • 1. 부양행동의 개념과 유형 = 26
    • 2. 노부모 부양행동의 관련변인 = 31
    • 제 3 장 연구모형 및 조작적 정의 = 35
    • 제 1 절 연구모형 및 가설 = 35
    • 1. 연구모형 = 35
    • 2. 연구가설 = 36
    • 제 2 절 변수의 조작적 정의 = 37
    • 1. 독립변수 = 37
    • 2. 종속변수 = 39
    • 제 4 장 연구방법 = 40
    • 제 1 절 조사대상자 및 자료수집절차 = 40
    • 1. 조사대상자 = 40
    • 2. 표집 및 자료수집절차 = 40
    • 제 2 절 변수의 측정 및 분석방법 = 41
    • 1. 측정도구 = 41
    • 2. 분석방법 = 47
    • 제 5 장 연구결과 및 분석 = 49
    • 제 1 절 조사대상자 및 노부모의 일반적 특성 = 49
    • 1. 조사대상자의 일반적 특성 = 49
    • 2. 노부모의 일반적 특성 = 52
    • 제 2 절 보상, 비용, 가족주의가치관 및 부양행동의 전반적 경향 = 54
    • 1. 보상의 일반적 경향 = 54
    • 2. 비용의 일반적 경향 = 55
    • 3. 가족주의가치관의 일반적 경향 = 57
    • 4. 노부모 부양행동의 일반적 경향 = 59
    • 제 3 절 부양행동에 영향을 미치는 요인들 = 60
    • 1. 경제적 부양행동에 영향을 미치는 요인 = 61
    • 2. 정서적 부양행동에 영향을 미치는 요인 = 65
    • 3. 서비스 부양행동에 영향을 미치는 요인 = 68
    • 4. 전체 부양행동에 영향을 미치는 요인 = 71
    • 제 4 절 위계적 다중회귀분석 = 73
    • 1. 경제적 부양행동에 대한 위계적 다중회귀분석 = 74
    • 2. 정서적 부양행동에 대한 위계적 다중회귀분석 = 75
    • 3. 서비스 부양행동에 대한 위계적 다중회귀분석 = 76
    • 4. 전체 부양행동에 대한 위계적 다중회귀분석 = 77
    • 제 6 장 결론 = 78
    • 제 1 절 연구결과 요약 및 논의 = 78
    • 제 2 절 연구의 함의 = 83
    • 제 3 절 연구의 한계점 및 제언 = 84
    • 1. 연구의 한계점 = 84
    • 2. 제언 = 85
    • 참고문헌 = 87
    • 부록 = 100
    • ABSTRACT = 110
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼