中小企業育成方案에 관한 硏究 : 光州ㆍ全南地域을 中心으로 = (A) Study on the Development Plan of Small business : in Kwang JuㆍCheon Nam region

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Today we live in a world of infinite competition. Korea accomplished remarkable economic growth during the last three decades. But lately many small businesses have been bankrupted under IMF system. Besides the development of the information communication revolution coupled with the World Trade Organization regime, has gradually lowered the artificial and institutional barriers between countries. The most important object of korean industrial policy at present is to readjust and restrict the industrial structure within the limits of domestic resource endowments.
Facing the changing international economic system, we must also solve the unfavorable relationship between small businesses and big businesses. Further more, in the age of technological competition, it is necessary to promote technological innovation is ever increasing.
The major concern in Korea has been the increasing concentration of economic power in the hands of a comparatively limited munber of Jae Bual. They have expanded their business disproportionately, extending their interests even into the areas where smaller firms could perform more efficiently. Thereby it has become inevitable for the goverment to adopt restrictive measures on disproportionate diversification of big businesses. Small businesses in Korea are confronted with outward inpediments such as the international economic unstability and lag of domestic economy as well as inward structual fragilities such as lack of ability to ensure capital and backwardness of facilities.
Natwithstanding the above problems, small businesses play a profoundly important role in the national economy in the areas of employment opportunity, balanced regional development, technology innovation and cooperation among different industries. Therefore in order to ensure the sound development of small businesses, new phase of small business policy should be made through the enactment of legislation of small businesses.
Beginning with Small Business Coopertives Act enacted in 1961, legislation of small business including Small Business Basic Act, Small and Medium Industry Bank Act, Small Business Activity Adjustment Act, Small Business Subcontract Acceleration Act and Small Business Promotion Act and so on have been made thereafter. As a main body of study, this thesis systemizes legislation of small businesses and reviews them to present new suggestions which solve the sudden problems of small businesses as well as future development of them.
This thesis is composed of V chapters.
(1) In chapter I it deals with the actual situation of small businesses in Korea and then points out the problems involved in them.
(2) In chapter Ⅱ it deals with the present condition and definition of small business, then laws relating to small business and general theories of small business.
(3) In chapter Ⅲ it deals with problems relating to small businesses in Kwang Ju and Jun Nam region.
(4) In Chapter Ⅳ it deals with the competitive power method of small businesses and promotion of their power, especially for Kwang Ju and Jun Nam regional small business.
(5) Chapter V is the conclusion.
The competitive power of small small businesses lag far behind that of large businesses due to small scale of business, lack of ability to secure capital and lower level of business management and technical know-how. Therefore wide range of legislation work should be promptly conducted by the government to lead small business on a normal track.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅳ
• 제1장 序論 = 1
• 제1절 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 제2절 硏究方法 및 範圍 = 2
• 제2장 中小企業의 定義와 本質 = 4
• 제1절 中小企業에 관한 定義의 必要性 = 4
• 제2절 中小企業에 관한 一般的 定義 = 4
• 1. 中小企業 區分 基準 = 4
• 2. 各國의 中小企業 定義 = 5
• 가. 日本 = 6
• 나. 美國 = 6
• 다. 英國 = 7
• 라. 獨逸 = 8
• 제3절 中小企業의 本質 = 9
• 1. 中小企業 消滅論 = 10
• 가. 古典學派의 中小企業 消滅論 = 10
• 나. 마르크스의 小資本驅逐論 = 10
• 2. 마샬(A.Marshall)의 中小企業 理論 = 10
• 3. E.A.G.로빈슨의 適正規模論 = 11
• 4. 不完全競爭理論 = 11
• 5. 스타인들의 小企業存立條件論 = 12
• 6. 獨占支配論的 小企業論 = 13
• 7. 中小企業의 質的·量的特性 = 13
• 제3장 中小企業과 中小企業關係法體系 = 16
• 제1절 우리나라의 中小企業 = 16
• 1. 中小企業의 範圍 = 16
• 가. 一般的 基準 = 16
• 나. 별도의 基準 = 16
• 2. 우리나라의 中小企業 現況 = 17
• 가. 地域別 現況 = 17
• 나. 業種別 現況 = 18
• 다. 規模別 現況 = 19
• 3. 光州·全南地域 現況 = 20
• 가. 地域經濟의 與件 = 20
• 나. 産業動向 = 22
• (1) 鑛工業 = 22
• (2) 建設業 및 工業團地 現況 = 25
• 다. 中小企業 操業 動向 = 25
• 라. 輸出入 動向 = 27
• (1) 輸出 = 27
• (2) 輸入 = 27
• 마. 資金事情 = 28
• 제2절 中小企業關係法의 體系 = 29
• 1. 外國의 中小企業關係法 = 29
• 가. 美國 = 29
• 나. 西獨 = 30
• 다. 日本 = 30
• 2. 우리나라 中小企業關係法 = 30
• 가. 中小企業關係法의 沿革 = 31
• 나. 中小企業關係法의 內容 = 31
• (1) 中小企業基本法 = 32
• (2) 中小企業의 組織關係法 = 32
• (3) 育成政策支援關係法 = 33
• (4) 事業活動不利點 改善을 위한 關係法 = 33
• (5) 金融支援 關係法 = 34
• 다. 中小企業關係法의 體系改善의 方向 = 34
• 제4장 中小企業의 活性化 方案 = 36
• 제1절 地域中小企業의 問題點 = 36
• 1. 地方自治團體의 地域經濟 管理力量 不足 = 36
• 가. 制限的인 經濟行政權限 = 36
• 나. 취약한 經濟關聯 組織 및 人力 = 39
• 다. 빈약한 財政支援 能力 = 40
• 2. 大企業과 中小企業의 兩極化 = 41
• 3. 社會間接資本의 열악 = 42
• 4. 地方財政의 中小企業支援 微弱 = 43
• 5. 産業構造의 偏重性 = 44
• 6. 製造業 業種間 聯關效果의 미흡 = 45
• 제2절 中小企業 活性化 方案 = 46
• 1. 地方經濟 管理役割 强化를 위한 主要施策 = 46
• 가. 地方自治團體의 經濟行政機能 및 組織强化 = 46
• (1) 經濟行政權限의 地方移讓 = 46
• (2) 經濟行政組織의 强化 = 47
• 나. 自治團體의 財政的 手段 强化 = 48
• (1) 自治團體 獨自的인 投資財源의 확보 = 48
• (2) 彈力稅 適用의 擴大 및 補完 = 49
• 다. 地方中小企業에 대한 支援 내실화 = 49
• (1)『地域信用保證組合』에 대한 支援 擴大 = 49
• (2) 中小企業綜合支援센터 運營 내실화 = 50
• 라. 特性化産業의 重點 育成 = 51
• (1) 地域資源의 적극적 活用 유도 = 51
• (2)『示範特化團地』 造成 支援 = 52
• 마. 地域金融의 活性化 = 52
• (1) 地域金融機關에 대한 營業規制 緩和 = 52
• (2) 地方造成資金의 地域再投資 촉진 = 53
• 바. 競爭을 통한 地域經濟 活性化 促進 = 54
• (1) 經濟活性化 施策 우수단체의 선정 = 54
• (2) 우수 企業體에 대한 特別 인센티브 부여 = 54
• 2. 地域經濟構造의 調整方向 = 55
• 가. 지역내 産業構造의 高度化 지속 推進 = 55
• 나. 國際化 基盤造成 = 56
• 다. 地域潛在力의 提高 = 58
• 라. 環境의 地域競爭力 강화 = 61
• 3. 中小企業의 自助的 노력 = 65
• 4. 中小企業에 대한 大企業의 責任과 役割 = 66
• 5. 政府支援의 擴大 = 67
• 6. 消費者, 金融機關, 地域社會의 協助 = 68
• 제5장 結論 = 69
• 1. 經濟마인드의 적극 活用 = 69
• 2. 地域經濟活性化 特別法 制定 = 70
• 3. 環境親和的 産業構造 變化와 潛在力活用 극대화 = 70
• 參考文獻 = 73