RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    부모화와 안녕감의 구조관계 분석 = Analysis of Structural Relationships Between Parentification and Well-Being

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13087056

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the structural relationship of shame, social support, and self-efficacy on well-being through the relationship between parentification and well-being.
    To achieve these result, A total of four competing hypothesized structural models were proposed based on both previous studies and theoretical supports.
    A total of 926 participants from four universities and four college in Busan and Kyeong-Nam, South Korea responded to five questionnaires designed to measure parentification, shame, social support, self-efficacy or well-being. The results were analyzed and interpreted using descreptive statistics, correlation analysis, and structrual equation modeling. Results indicated that the "model 2" of four hypothesized models has the best fit for the data.
    The model 2 shows the following results:
    First, parentification-caretaking and parentification-injustice had not only an impact on well-being directly but also either just through sham or self-efficacy. But parentification-injustice didn’t affect self-efficacy directly.
    Second, parentification-caretaking and parentification-injustice had an impact on well-being through both shame and self-efficacy in sequence.
    Third, parentification-caretaking and parentification-injustice had an impact on well-being through both social support and self-efficacy in sequence, but there was no direct effect from social support on the well-being.
    Finally, parentification, shame, social support, and self-efficacy accounted for 56% of the variance of well-being. Limitations of this study and implications for future studies were discussed.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the structural relationship of shame, social support, and self-efficacy on well-being through the relationship between parentification and well-being. To achieve these result, A total of four competing hypothe...

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the structural relationship of shame, social support, and self-efficacy on well-being through the relationship between parentification and well-being.
    To achieve these result, A total of four competing hypothesized structural models were proposed based on both previous studies and theoretical supports.
    A total of 926 participants from four universities and four college in Busan and Kyeong-Nam, South Korea responded to five questionnaires designed to measure parentification, shame, social support, self-efficacy or well-being. The results were analyzed and interpreted using descreptive statistics, correlation analysis, and structrual equation modeling. Results indicated that the "model 2" of four hypothesized models has the best fit for the data.
    The model 2 shows the following results:
    First, parentification-caretaking and parentification-injustice had not only an impact on well-being directly but also either just through sham or self-efficacy. But parentification-injustice didn’t affect self-efficacy directly.
    Second, parentification-caretaking and parentification-injustice had an impact on well-being through both shame and self-efficacy in sequence.
    Third, parentification-caretaking and parentification-injustice had an impact on well-being through both social support and self-efficacy in sequence, but there was no direct effect from social support on the well-being.
    Finally, parentification, shame, social support, and self-efficacy accounted for 56% of the variance of well-being. Limitations of this study and implications for future studies were discussed.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구문제 및 가설 13
    • 3. 용어의 정의 14
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 16
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구문제 및 가설 13
    • 3. 용어의 정의 14
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 16
    • 1. 부모화 16
    • 1) 부모화의 개념 16
    • 2) 부모화가 개인의 삶에 미치는 영향 21
    • 2. 안녕감 27
    • 1) 안녕감의 개념 27
    • 2) 부모화와 안녕감 31
    • 3. 안녕감에 영향을 미치는 매개 변인들 33
    • 1) 수치심 33
    • 2) 사회적 지지 41
    • 3) 자기효능감 50
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법 57
    • 1. 연구모형 57
    • 2. 연구대상 63
    • 3. 측정도구 65
    • 4. 자료분석 69
    • Ⅳ. 결과 및 해석 70
    • 1. 변수의 기술통계 70
    • 2. 측정모형 검증 73
    • 3. 구조모형 검증 76
    • Ⅴ. 논 의 83
    • Ⅵ. 요약 및 결론 91
    • 1. 요약 91
    • 2. 결론 및 제언 93
    • 참 고 문 헌 96
    • 부 록 129
    • Abstract 138
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼