울산광역시 도시경관에 대한 자치구별 비교분석 = Corprative analysis among districs on urban landscape in Ulsan metropolitan city

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It has been recognized that the urban landscape is a very important factor in a modern city. Recently, under the veil of economic growth has sought a continuous development that seems to be deteriorating the urban visual landscape. For this matter, the recent issues of sustainable urban development plan and amenity resource conservation has helped to improve the overall awareness of urban visual landscape to the public.
This paper is designed to investigate representative landscape and image of urban landscape, and analyze satisfactory factor of representative landscape in Ulsan. The main findings are as follows. This study devide landscape resources into three categories which consist of natural, historical and artificial resources. The study shows that natural resources are the most representative and preferred landscape among three categories. This result implies that open space and green areas are key factors for selecting the choice. For detail, the result shows that Ulsan grand park and Munsu sports park are the most recognizing representative landscape as well as the most preferred landscape. There is high relationship between representative landscape and preferred landscape. That is, most representative landscapes are preferred landscapes. It seems that beautiful scenery, recognition, and accessibility are the three most important factors to selecting representative and preferred landscape. Especially beautiful scenery and recognition are important factor for natural resources. Young People preferred visible and interesting artificial places and downtown areas compared with other generations. Most respondents represented negative attitudes for urban landscape like unpleasant, crowded, and dangerous. There is significant difference in respondents' images for urban landscape by their residential districts. It seems probable that urban landscape images are influenced by socioeconomic and geographic factors. As a dwelling place, Nam-gu district got the highest points for urban landscape assessment due to its modernistic image caused by concentration of socioeconomic and cultural facilities. In contrast, Jung-gu district had the lowest points owing to its insufficient infrastructure.
According to the results, most respondents prefer green area and open-space than crowded and unpleasant urban landscape. Each district's socioeconomic factors influence residents' image for their urban landscape images.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
• 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 4
• 1. 연구의 범위 = 4
• 2. 연구의 방법 = 5
• 제2장 이론적 고찰 및 선행연구 = 6
• 제1절 도시경관에 대한 이론적 고찰 = 6
• 1. 도시경관의 개념 및 구성요소 = 6
• 2. 도시 이미지의 형성 및 결정요소 = 9
• 제2절 도시경관에 관한 선행연구 = 13
• 1. 도시경관관련 지표와 평가에 관한 선행연구 = 13
• 2. 도시경관의 인지특성에 관한 선행연구 = 17
• 제3장 대상지역의 현황 = 20
• 제1절 울산광역시의 일반 현황 = 20
• 1. 울산광역시 위치 및 지형적 특성 = 20
• 2. 울산광역시 행정구역 및 인구 = 21
• 제2절 울산광역시의 자치구·군별 경관 현황 = 23
• 1. 중구 = 23
• 2. 남구 = 24
• 3. 동구 = 25
• 4. 북구 = 26
• 5. 울주군 = 27
• 제4장 울산시 도시경관에 관한 주민의식조사 및 분석 = 29
• 제1절 자료의 수집과 응답자 특성 = 29
• 제2절 도시경관에 대한 자치구별 주민의식 분석 = 34
• 1. 대표경관에 대한 분석 = 35
• 2. 선호경관에 대한 분석 = 40
• 3. 개선해야 할 경관에 대한 분석 = 45
• 4. 울산시 자치구별 도시이미지에 대한 분석 = 48
• 5. 울산시 도시경관 전체 만족도에 대한 분석 = 51
• 제5장 결론 = 57
• □ 참고문헌□ = 61
• 부록 : 설문지 = 63
• ■ Abstract = 69