RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    北韓의 經濟開放化 政策에 관한 硏究 = A Study on the Economic Opening Policy of the North Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2074522

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The economy of socialism had been somehow developed by 1950's but after 1960's, being compared with the rapid growth of science and technology and economy of the developed countries of capitalism, the economy of Soviet and Eastern European countries had begun to expose the falling of technical innovation and the low growth of economy.
    The new compendium of the Soviet Communist Party, passed by the 27th convention of Communist Party last February, had deleted it's old compendium stating that Soviet caught up with U.S.A. within ten years and taken an real attitude. In view of the results of economy for last 25 years, they approved it is impossible for them to surpass the countries of capitalism. Gorbachev also stated eradicating innovation for breaking the stagnation of Soviet economy.
    After DENG SIAO PING's holding of real power, hind had started to propell strongly the modern policies by the line of pragmatism. China had pursued the conversion to the open door economy system including the introducing of the principles of market economy. On the other hand, China had enacted and declared 「The firm law of joint stocks administration between China and the other countries(中外合資經營企業法)」and make their all effort in introducing actively capital and technology from western developed countries.
    And though the Eastern European countries do not get out of the perversely political and military domination under the U.S.S.R., they have enlarged economical crossing with the western countries in order to break away from their economical isolation and to dissolve their internal discontent.
    As it is, the declaration of pragmatic line of the countries that including the Soviet Union, China and communitic areas if the Eastern European countries may explain epoch-making turn over of socialism that means a limit of 「Marx-Renin」doctrine.
    North Korea that took an impetus from econo-political conversion of these countries of Socialism had been planning turn over to foreign economic Policy. eighties, Kim Il-Sung together his delegates visited seven Eastern European countries including the U.S.S.R. from May 14th '84 to July first '84.
    Informed that they didn't gain a large outcome but Kim Il-Sung and his staff's of econo-deplomatic department felt actually that their lock-out policy fell behind very much. Therefore they, in the first time, seemed to propose to adopt clique line which must open foreign policy fradually in the Eastern European countries.
    Moreover North Korea failed in the 2th seven-year economic plan started under the target including making identity, modernization, making-scientifical, and then enacted and declared, so-called 「joint-administration law(合營法)」 composed by five chapter, 26 section at the conversation of supreme people conference Sep. 8th 1984. We can regard this law as the succeeding measure to the change of the line of economics policies about the externaltrade and cooperation of international economy.
    But it was difficult that N.K.'s 「joint-administration law(合營法)」 pursued bold policies because of opposite character against the chief kims' identity idea and especially opposite position for the joint investment between them and N.K. The reason is,
    1) The doubt about profit of the law.
    2) The falling of international confidence about the problem, of foreign debt.
    3) The insufficiency of social secondhand facilities, such as, roads, harbor facilities, distributive service system.
    4) The problem of pursuit for the opening of social system in the external side of economy.
    But we must admit that this law has an influence on making a new conversation of economic development of the N.K. In any case, this is very different from the progress of 「the firm law joint stocks administration between China and the other countries(中外合資經營企業法)」at this time.

    번역하기

    The economy of socialism had been somehow developed by 1950's but after 1960's, being compared with the rapid growth of science and technology and economy of the developed countries of capitalism, the economy of Soviet and Eastern European countries h...

    The economy of socialism had been somehow developed by 1950's but after 1960's, being compared with the rapid growth of science and technology and economy of the developed countries of capitalism, the economy of Soviet and Eastern European countries had begun to expose the falling of technical innovation and the low growth of economy.
    The new compendium of the Soviet Communist Party, passed by the 27th convention of Communist Party last February, had deleted it's old compendium stating that Soviet caught up with U.S.A. within ten years and taken an real attitude. In view of the results of economy for last 25 years, they approved it is impossible for them to surpass the countries of capitalism. Gorbachev also stated eradicating innovation for breaking the stagnation of Soviet economy.
    After DENG SIAO PING's holding of real power, hind had started to propell strongly the modern policies by the line of pragmatism. China had pursued the conversion to the open door economy system including the introducing of the principles of market economy. On the other hand, China had enacted and declared 「The firm law of joint stocks administration between China and the other countries(中外合資經營企業法)」and make their all effort in introducing actively capital and technology from western developed countries.
    And though the Eastern European countries do not get out of the perversely political and military domination under the U.S.S.R., they have enlarged economical crossing with the western countries in order to break away from their economical isolation and to dissolve their internal discontent.
    As it is, the declaration of pragmatic line of the countries that including the Soviet Union, China and communitic areas if the Eastern European countries may explain epoch-making turn over of socialism that means a limit of 「Marx-Renin」doctrine.
    North Korea that took an impetus from econo-political conversion of these countries of Socialism had been planning turn over to foreign economic Policy. eighties, Kim Il-Sung together his delegates visited seven Eastern European countries including the U.S.S.R. from May 14th '84 to July first '84.
    Informed that they didn't gain a large outcome but Kim Il-Sung and his staff's of econo-deplomatic department felt actually that their lock-out policy fell behind very much. Therefore they, in the first time, seemed to propose to adopt clique line which must open foreign policy fradually in the Eastern European countries.
    Moreover North Korea failed in the 2th seven-year economic plan started under the target including making identity, modernization, making-scientifical, and then enacted and declared, so-called 「joint-administration law(合營法)」 composed by five chapter, 26 section at the conversation of supreme people conference Sep. 8th 1984. We can regard this law as the succeeding measure to the change of the line of economics policies about the externaltrade and cooperation of international economy.
    But it was difficult that N.K.'s 「joint-administration law(合營法)」 pursued bold policies because of opposite character against the chief kims' identity idea and especially opposite position for the joint investment between them and N.K. The reason is,
    1) The doubt about profit of the law.
    2) The falling of international confidence about the problem, of foreign debt.
    3) The insufficiency of social secondhand facilities, such as, roads, harbor facilities, distributive service system.
    4) The problem of pursuit for the opening of social system in the external side of economy.
    But we must admit that this law has an influence on making a new conversation of economic development of the N.K. In any case, this is very different from the progress of 「the firm law joint stocks administration between China and the other countries(中外合資經營企業法)」at this time.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 北韓의 經濟現實
    • 1. 北韓의 財政總量規模
    • 2. '85決算과 '86豫算에서 본 北韓經濟
    • 3. 住民福祉投資와 軍事費
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 北韓의 經濟現實
    • 1. 北韓의 財政總量規模
    • 2. '85決算과 '86豫算에서 본 北韓經濟
    • 3. 住民福祉投資와 軍事費
    • Ⅲ. 轉換期의 社會主義國家의 經濟政策
    • 1. 소련의 經濟政策
    • 2. 東歐諸國의 經濟政策
    • 3. 中共經濟의 開放化政策
    • Ⅳ. 北韓의 「合營法」
    • 1. 北韓의 對外經濟政策의 基本形態
    • 2. 「合營法」의 採擇背景
    • 3. 「合營法」의 內容과 意義
    • 4. 北韓의 經濟交流의 問題와 그 實績
    • Ⅴ. 分析과 展望
    • 1. 分析
    • 2. 展望
    • 參考文獻
    • Summary
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼