RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    은유의 의미기술에 관한 연구 = Formal Description of Metaphorical Meanings

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11931559

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    According to Lakoff and Johnson(1980), metaphor was regarded as a poetic imaginary or rhetoric technique, and was not dealt with a general term but specific representation. This view causes people to think that metaphor is rather necessary to express a rhetoric effect in poem or literature than to use in their daily life. But it is fact that metaphor actually affects not only our daily lives but also cognitive power and concept system.
    This paper deals with the meaning description of metaphor by the subatomic semantic model. Miller(1979) classified the type of metaphor as nominal metaphor, predicative metaphor, and sentential metaphor. However his description of metaphor could not satisfy the actual meaning. Especially his innovative device for metaphorical meaning description was a function SIM but the function could not apply to the predicative and sentential metaphorical meaning description.
    According to Davidson's event structure semantics or subatomic semantics, it supports to explain adverb, which is regarded as an unnecessary element, grammatically all right with following compositionality as well as to describe meaningful relation like entailment and omission. In this context, the subatomic semantics could represent the metaphorical menaing more easily. For instance the usual predicative metaphor means the entailment or result, and those meanings can be represented without function like SIM. Therefore subatomic semantics is just strong enough to be as a method to describe the metaphoric meaning. So it is possible to describe the metaphoric meaning formally by adapting event structure semantics model.
    번역하기

    According to Lakoff and Johnson(1980), metaphor was regarded as a poetic imaginary or rhetoric technique, and was not dealt with a general term but specific representation. This view causes people to think that metaphor is rather necessary to express ...

    According to Lakoff and Johnson(1980), metaphor was regarded as a poetic imaginary or rhetoric technique, and was not dealt with a general term but specific representation. This view causes people to think that metaphor is rather necessary to express a rhetoric effect in poem or literature than to use in their daily life. But it is fact that metaphor actually affects not only our daily lives but also cognitive power and concept system.
    This paper deals with the meaning description of metaphor by the subatomic semantic model. Miller(1979) classified the type of metaphor as nominal metaphor, predicative metaphor, and sentential metaphor. However his description of metaphor could not satisfy the actual meaning. Especially his innovative device for metaphorical meaning description was a function SIM but the function could not apply to the predicative and sentential metaphorical meaning description.
    According to Davidson's event structure semantics or subatomic semantics, it supports to explain adverb, which is regarded as an unnecessary element, grammatically all right with following compositionality as well as to describe meaningful relation like entailment and omission. In this context, the subatomic semantics could represent the metaphorical menaing more easily. For instance the usual predicative metaphor means the entailment or result, and those meanings can be represented without function like SIM. Therefore subatomic semantics is just strong enough to be as a method to describe the metaphoric meaning. So it is possible to describe the metaphoric meaning formally by adapting event structure semantics model.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목 차
    • ABSTRACT
    • 제 1장 서론
    • 목 차
    • ABSTRACT
    • 제 1장 서론
    • 1.1 은유의 의미
    • 1.2 은유에 관한 몇 가지 견해
    • 1.3 은유 기술의 문제점
    • 1.3.1 합성성(Compositionality)의 원리
    • 1.3.2 선택 제약(Selectional Restriction)
    • 제 2장 사건 구조 의미론
    • 2.1 부사
    • 2.2 주어, 목적어 생략
    • 제 3장 은유의 형식과 의미
    • 제 4장 은유의 사건 구조적 의미기술
    • 4.1 명사적 은유의 기술
    • 4.2 서술적 은유의 기술
    • 4.3 문장 은유의 기술
    • 제 5장 결론
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼