RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고려시대 금속공예 선각(線刻)기법의기술과 유형 = Technique and Type of Line Expression in Goryeo Dynasty Metal Craft Engraving

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107059412

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The engraved line expression in metal crafts is a detailed technique of carving or decorating metal surfaces. Thistechnique engraves a line using a tool on the surface of a metal craft. This technique was used extensively in articlesmade of various metal materials during the Goryeo Dynasty, and the range of patterns that could be expressed andthe width of users was wide .
      In this paper, based on relics and literature, the concept of line representation of this engraving technique usedin the metal crafts of the Goryeo Dynasty and the perceptions and terms of the Goryeo Dynasty were examined. Inaddition, the users engaged in this craft and the specific patterns and patterns of decoration were reviewed. Throughthese means, it was possible to confirm various aspects of a technique that was thought previously to involve justsimple expression of lines using tools.
      In addition, through the literature, Geumseokmun Gate, and relics currently being transmitted , it was possibleto confirm the utilization patterns of techniques used in various types of objects. Various uses have led to thecombination with other metal craft techniques that were popular at the time, and while utilizing unique characteristicsof the techniques, this maximized the molding of various patterns.
      In the meantime, it is true that the intaglio technique in metal crafts has not received much attention comparedto the decoration techniques of other metal crafts, such as inlay, embossing, and openwork techniques in whichdecorative effects are maximized due to the recognition that the technique was used so widely in relics. However,the universality of the technique is premised on its wide use across all eras. As such, it was used in metal craft relicsthat reflect the various cultural characteristics of Korea and various cultural aspects that are currently passed down.
      On the one hand, technology has been passed down as a form of intangible heritage that embodies a longstandingcraft culture which continues to the present in the fields of sculpture and intangible cultural properties. As such, theuniversality of Seongak contains many cultural meanings. In addition, the uniqueness of the technique is distinct,and it is deeply related to Goryeo, who was in charge of the use of technology and craftsmanship of the JoseonDynasty and the metal craft technology that is currently handed down. I think research on future techniques shouldbe continued in depth.
      번역하기

      The engraved line expression in metal crafts is a detailed technique of carving or decorating metal surfaces. Thistechnique engraves a line using a tool on the surface of a metal craft. This technique was used extensively in articlesmade of various me...

      The engraved line expression in metal crafts is a detailed technique of carving or decorating metal surfaces. Thistechnique engraves a line using a tool on the surface of a metal craft. This technique was used extensively in articlesmade of various metal materials during the Goryeo Dynasty, and the range of patterns that could be expressed andthe width of users was wide .
      In this paper, based on relics and literature, the concept of line representation of this engraving technique usedin the metal crafts of the Goryeo Dynasty and the perceptions and terms of the Goryeo Dynasty were examined. Inaddition, the users engaged in this craft and the specific patterns and patterns of decoration were reviewed. Throughthese means, it was possible to confirm various aspects of a technique that was thought previously to involve justsimple expression of lines using tools.
      In addition, through the literature, Geumseokmun Gate, and relics currently being transmitted , it was possibleto confirm the utilization patterns of techniques used in various types of objects. Various uses have led to thecombination with other metal craft techniques that were popular at the time, and while utilizing unique characteristicsof the techniques, this maximized the molding of various patterns.
      In the meantime, it is true that the intaglio technique in metal crafts has not received much attention comparedto the decoration techniques of other metal crafts, such as inlay, embossing, and openwork techniques in whichdecorative effects are maximized due to the recognition that the technique was used so widely in relics. However,the universality of the technique is premised on its wide use across all eras. As such, it was used in metal craft relicsthat reflect the various cultural characteristics of Korea and various cultural aspects that are currently passed down.
      On the one hand, technology has been passed down as a form of intangible heritage that embodies a longstandingcraft culture which continues to the present in the fields of sculpture and intangible cultural properties. As such, theuniversality of Seongak contains many cultural meanings. In addition, the uniqueness of the technique is distinct,and it is deeply related to Goryeo, who was in charge of the use of technology and craftsmanship of the JoseonDynasty and the metal craft technology that is currently handed down. I think research on future techniques shouldbe continued in depth.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 경기문화재연구원, "회암사Ⅵ" 2017

      2 경기문화재연구원, "회암사Ⅴ" 2016

      3 이난영, "한국 고대의 금속공예" 서울대학교 출판부, 50-51, 2012

      4 김세린, "조선시대 금속공예 入絲 연구" 이화여자대학교 2019

      5 "이뮤지엄 홈페이지"

      6 한양명, "영산줄다리기" 피아 21-, 2005

      7 신숙, "신안선 속의 금속공예" 문화재청, 국립해양유물전시관 232-245, 2007

      8 "리움 홈페이지"

      9 "국립중앙박물관 홈페이지"

      10 "국립무형유산원 무형유산 디지털 아카이브 홈페이지"

      1 경기문화재연구원, "회암사Ⅵ" 2017

      2 경기문화재연구원, "회암사Ⅴ" 2016

      3 이난영, "한국 고대의 금속공예" 서울대학교 출판부, 50-51, 2012

      4 김세린, "조선시대 금속공예 入絲 연구" 이화여자대학교 2019

      5 "이뮤지엄 홈페이지"

      6 한양명, "영산줄다리기" 피아 21-, 2005

      7 신숙, "신안선 속의 금속공예" 문화재청, 국립해양유물전시관 232-245, 2007

      8 "리움 홈페이지"

      9 "국립중앙박물관 홈페이지"

      10 "국립무형유산원 무형유산 디지털 아카이브 홈페이지"

      11 최응천, "고려후기의 금속공예" 한국불교미술사학회 (22) : 125-156, 2004

      12 최응천, "고려시대 金屬工藝의 匠人" 한국미술사학회 (241) : 171-192, 2004

      13 김은애, "고려시대 타출공예품 연구" 홍익대학교 대학원 2003

      14 김은애, "고려시대 타출 공예 연구" 한국미술사학회 (253) : 31-72, 2007

      15 김세린, "고려시대 입사공예품의 장인과 기술" 한국중세고고학회 (5) : 45-68, 2019

      16 임지윤, "고려시대 어자문공예품 연구" 홍익대학교 대학원 2007

      17 우주옥, "고려시대 선각불상경 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2009

      18 임지윤, "고려시대 魚子文 금속공예품 연구" 한국미술사학회 271272 (271272): 5-44, 2011

      19 안귀숙, "고려미술의 대외교섭" 예경 153-192, 2004

      20 안귀숙, "고려 금속공예에 보이는 遼文化의 영향" 이화사학연구소 (40) : 120-161, 2010

      21 김세린, "高麗時代 禁制와 工匠制를 통해 본 金屬象嵌技法의 양상" 한국미술연구소 (36) : 167-200, 2013

      22 "高麗史"

      23 徐聖鎬, "高麗前期 手工業 硏究" 서울大學校 大學院 1997

      24 "牧隱集"

      25 "東國李相國集後集"

      26 "東國李相國集"

      27 "新增東國輿地勝覽"

      28 "宣和奉使高麗圖經"

      29 "宋史"

      30 "唐六典"

      31 "三國史記"

      32 최응천, "『고려도경』에 보이는 고려시대 공예의 양상과 특징" 한국중세사학회 (55) : 141-174, 2018

      33 장남원, "『 선화봉사고려도경(宣和奉使高麗圖經)』 의 기명류(器皿類) 연구" 호서사학회 (70) : 165-203, 2014

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.39 0.39 0.32
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.3 0.32 0.57 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼