RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      스포츠센터 이용자의 만족도에 관한 연구 = (A) Study on the Satisfaction of Sports Center's Participants

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8309087

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        광주 : 조선대학교 대학원, 1999

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(석사) -- 조선대학교 대학원 , 체육학과 , 2000. 2

      • 발행연도

        1999

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        692.3 판사항(4)

      • 발행국(도시)

        광주

      • 형태사항

        vi, 57p. : 삽도 ; 26cm

      • 일반주기명

        참고문헌: p. 50-54

      • 소장기관
        • 국립경국대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 동아대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 조선대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study to examines satisfaction of Sport Center's participant by regional groups.
      The rate of participants in this study were 35.7%(N=110) in Great Sphere City, 31.5%(N=97) in City and 32.8%(N=101) in County.
      The Satisfaction Questionnaire was 27 items of health, facilities, environment, convenience, sports leader, program and fee.
      Items are measured on a Likert scale ranging from l(strong1y degree) to %strongly disagree).
      The statistic ways used for this study were Frequency Analysis and One-way ANOVA
      The results of this study are as follows;The satisfaction of participants in Sports Center showed a significant difference by regional groups.
      First, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of health by regional groups. Participants in Great Sphere City and City showed more interest than other regions about health management.
      Second, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of facilities by regional groups. Participants in County showed more dissatisfaction than other regions about facilities.
      Third, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of environment by regional groups. Participants in City showed more satisfaction than other regions about environment.
      Fourth, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of convenience by regional groups. Participants in Great Sphere City showed more satisfaction than other regions about convenience.
      Fifth, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of sport leader by regional groups. Participants in Great Sphere City showed more satisfaction than other regions about sport leader.
      Sixth, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of program by regional groups. Participants in County showed more dissatisfaction than other regions about program.
      Seventh, there was no significant difference in satisfaction of fee by regional groups.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study to examines satisfaction of Sport Center's participant by regional groups. The rate of participants in this study were 35.7%(N=110) in Great Sphere City, 31.5%(N=97) in City and 32.8%(N=101) in County. The Satisfaction Ques...

      The purpose of this study to examines satisfaction of Sport Center's participant by regional groups.
      The rate of participants in this study were 35.7%(N=110) in Great Sphere City, 31.5%(N=97) in City and 32.8%(N=101) in County.
      The Satisfaction Questionnaire was 27 items of health, facilities, environment, convenience, sports leader, program and fee.
      Items are measured on a Likert scale ranging from l(strong1y degree) to %strongly disagree).
      The statistic ways used for this study were Frequency Analysis and One-way ANOVA
      The results of this study are as follows;The satisfaction of participants in Sports Center showed a significant difference by regional groups.
      First, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of health by regional groups. Participants in Great Sphere City and City showed more interest than other regions about health management.
      Second, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of facilities by regional groups. Participants in County showed more dissatisfaction than other regions about facilities.
      Third, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of environment by regional groups. Participants in City showed more satisfaction than other regions about environment.
      Fourth, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of convenience by regional groups. Participants in Great Sphere City showed more satisfaction than other regions about convenience.
      Fifth, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of sport leader by regional groups. Participants in Great Sphere City showed more satisfaction than other regions about sport leader.
      Sixth, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of program by regional groups. Participants in County showed more dissatisfaction than other regions about program.
      Seventh, there was no significant difference in satisfaction of fee by regional groups.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • ABSTRACT = ⅴ
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구변인 및 가설 = 3
      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • ABSTRACT = ⅴ
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구변인 및 가설 = 3
      • 가. 연구변인 = 3
      • 나. 연구가설 = 4
      • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 5
      • 4. 선행연구 = 5
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 8
      • 1. 스포츠센터의 정의와 기능 = 8
      • 가. 스포츠센터의 정의 = 8
      • 나. 스포츠센터의 기능 = 10
      • 2. 스포츠센터의 분류 = 12
      • 3. 만족이론 = 16
      • 4. 고객만족전략 = 21
      • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 23
      • 1. 연구대상 = 23
      • 2. 조사도구 = 23
      • 3. 설문의 타당도와 신뢰도 = 25
      • 4. 자료처리 = 26
      • Ⅳ. 결과 및 요약 = 27
      • 1. 연구대상자의 일반적 특성 분석 = 27
      • 2. 스포츠센터 이용자들의 세부영역별 만족도 = 29
      • 가. 건강관리 - 스포츠센터 이용목적 = 29
      • 나. 시설만족도 = 32
      • 다. 환경 만족도 = 35
      • 라. 편의성 만족도 = 37
      • 마. 지도자 만족도 = 40
      • 바. 프로그램 만족도 = 43
      • 사. 프로그램 참가비 만족도 = 45
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 = 47
      • 1. 결론 = 47
      • 2. 제언 = 48
      • 참고문헌 = 50
      • 부록 = 55
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼