The purpose of this study to examines satisfaction of Sport Center's participant by regional groups.
The rate of participants in this study were 35.7%(N=110) in Great Sphere City, 31.5%(N=97) in City and 32.8%(N=101) in County.
The Satisfaction Ques...
The purpose of this study to examines satisfaction of Sport Center's participant by regional groups.
The rate of participants in this study were 35.7%(N=110) in Great Sphere City, 31.5%(N=97) in City and 32.8%(N=101) in County.
The Satisfaction Questionnaire was 27 items of health, facilities, environment, convenience, sports leader, program and fee.
Items are measured on a Likert scale ranging from l(strong1y degree) to %strongly disagree).
The statistic ways used for this study were Frequency Analysis and One-way ANOVA
The results of this study are as follows;The satisfaction of participants in Sports Center showed a significant difference by regional groups.
First, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of health by regional groups. Participants in Great Sphere City and City showed more interest than other regions about health management.
Second, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of facilities by regional groups. Participants in County showed more dissatisfaction than other regions about facilities.
Third, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of environment by regional groups. Participants in City showed more satisfaction than other regions about environment.
Fourth, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of convenience by regional groups. Participants in Great Sphere City showed more satisfaction than other regions about convenience.
Fifth, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of sport leader by regional groups. Participants in Great Sphere City showed more satisfaction than other regions about sport leader.
Sixth, there was a significant difference in satisfaction of program by regional groups. Participants in County showed more dissatisfaction than other regions about program.
Seventh, there was no significant difference in satisfaction of fee by regional groups.