기업의 e-learning 프로그램에서 학습의 근전이(near transfer)와 원전이(far transfer)의 예측 변인 규명

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Although there has been a growing interest in learning transfer due to recognition of human resource development as the core to cooperations' competitive advantage, the rate of transfer of learning in practice is still very poor. Thus there are growing numbers of researches to study predictors of learning transfer. Although far transfer of learning is important for the organization's competitive advantage in a cooperative environment of rapid changes, most of the previous researches on transfer have been focused to examine predictors of near transfer. Since these studies of transfer have also been based on classroom-based training, they hardly found the transfer researches on e-Learning recently introduced by cooperations.
This study identifies predictors of near and far transfer in the context of corporate e-Learning based on the above research necessities. The following questions will be examined:
1. Can the individual's self efficacy predict near and far transfer?
2. Can the individual's metacognition predict near and far transfer?
3. Can learning achievement(understanding, behavior demonstration) predict near and far transfer?
4. Can transfer climate(social support, organizational support) predict near and far transfer?
5. Can near transfer predict far transfer?
After developing survey instruments for this study, the self-report method survey has been twice conducted with the employees of cooperation A who completed an e-Learning time management program in order to collect research datum. This study has employed the cases of 242 employees for the final analyses, while adopting t-test, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), correlation, and structural equation model to analyze the datum for the research goal.
The research results identify the predictors for near transfer as self efficacy, metacognition and the social support for transfer climate. The predictors for far transfer are regarded as metacognition and near transfer. The results also reveal that the indirect effect for far transfer are self efficacy, metacognition and the social support of transfer climate.
As an initial research to identify predictors of near and far transfer in the context of corporate e-Learning, this study helps to recognize the necessity of process perspective for learning transfer. It also provides the basic resources to develop some strategies to improve near transfer and far transfer from the perspective of HRD field.
This study suggests the necessities of the following researches. First, it needs to reconfirm both in classroom-based training program and in different training domains. Second, it requires further studies considering special predictors for e-Learning context. The correlation of far transfer also needs to be examined after adopting either training design or training method as predictors. Third, it requires to examine comprehensively the correlations among near transfer, far transfer, results of the individual and the organization, and ROI (Return On Investment) evaluation as the effectiveness of training.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

인적자원개발이 기업경쟁력의 핵심으로 인식되면서 과거 어느 때보다 학습의 현장 전이에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있으나 실제 학습의 전이율은 매우 저조한 상황이다. 이에 전이를 개선하는 차원에서 전이의 예측 변인 규명에 관한 연구가 활발하게 진행되고 있지만 연구의 대부분이 근전이의 예측 변인을 규명하는데 치중해 있다. 그러나 기업 환경이 급변하면서 교육훈련 내용을 응용하여 광범위한 상황에 적용하는 원전이의 실현이 조직 경쟁력의 중요한 요건이 되고 있다. 또한 기존의 전이 연구는 집합훈련 형태에 관한 전이 연구로서 최근 기업내에 빠른 속도로 확산되고 있는 e-Learning에 대한 전이 연구는 거의 이루어지지 않고 있다.
이러한 연구 필요성에 기초해 본 연구에서는 기업의 e-Learning 프로그램에서 학습의 근전이와 원전이의 예측 변인을 규명하고자 하였다. 구체적인 연구문제는 다음과 같다.
1. 개인의 자기효능감이 높을수록 근전이와 원전이의 수준이 높은가?
2. 개인의 초인지가 높을수록 근전이와 원전이의 수준이 높은가?
3. 학업성취도(이해도 영역, 수행도 영역)가 높을수록 근전이와 원전이의 수준이 높은가?
4. 전이풍토(사회적 지원, 조직적 지원)가 지원적일수록 근전이와 원전이의 수준이 높은가?
5. 근전이의 수준이 높을수록 원전이의 수준이 높은가?
본 연구를 위해 조사도구를 개발하고 시간관리 프로그램(e-Learning)을 수료한 A기업의 직원을 대상으로 2회에 걸쳐 자기보고식(self-report method) 설문 조사를 실시해 자료를 수집하였다. 최종적으로 분석에 활용된 사례 수는 242명이며 연구목적에 따라 t-test와 Analysis of Variance(ANOVA), 상관분석, 구조방정식 모형 방법을 이용하여 분석하였다.
연구결과로서 근전이의 예측 변인은 자기효능감, 초인지 및 전이풍토의 사회적 지원으로 분석되었으며 원전이의 예측 변인은 초인지와 근전이로 분석되었다. 또한 근전이를 매개로 해서 원전이에 간접적 효과를 주는 변인은 자기효능감, 초인지 및 전이풍토의 사회적 지원인 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구는 기업의 e-Learning 프로그램에서 근전이와 원전이의 예측 변인을 규명한 시초 연구로서 학습전이에 대한 결과론적 접근에서 벗어나 보다 과정(process)적인 시각의 필요성을 인식시켜 주며 근전이와 원전이를 향상시킬 수 있는 전략을 모색하는데 기초 자료로 활용될 수 있다.
이상의 연구결과를 바탕으로 다음과 같은 후속연구를 제안하였다.
첫째, 본 연구결과를 집합훈련 형태의 프로그램과 직능훈련, 관리자훈련 등 다른 훈련영역에 재검증하는 것이 필요하다. 둘째, e-Learning상황에서 특별히 고려될 수 있는 예측 변인을 추가한 연구가 필요하며 프로그램의 설계적 특징이나 훈련 방법 등을 변인으로 선정해서 원전이의 관련성을 검증하는 연구도 필요할 것이다. 셋째, 본 연구를 확장하여 근전이-원전이-개인 및 조직의 성과-ROI(Return On Investment)평가간의 관련성을 종합적으로 모색하는 연구가 필요할 것이다.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• 논문개요 = ⅸ
• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• A. 연구 필요성 및 의의 = 1
• B. 연구문제 = 5
• C. 용어의 정의 = 6
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 9
• A. 학습전이의 개념 = 9
• 1. 학습전이의 일반적 개념 = 9
• 2. 근전이 및 원전이의 구분과 개념 = 11
• B. 학습전이의 예측 변인 = 19
• 1. 학습전이 모형 = 19
• 2. 학습전이의 예측 변인 연구동향 = 27
• C. 근전이 및 원전이 예측 변인의 개념과 특징 = 31
• 1. 자기효능감(self efficacy)의 개념과 특징 = 32
• 2. 초인지(metacognition)의 개념과 특징 = 34
• 3. 학업성취도(learning achievement)의 하위 요인 = 37
• 4. 전이풍토(transfer climate)의 하위 요인 = 38
• D. 선행연구 = 43
• 1. 자기효능감, 초인지, 학업성취도, 전이풍토와 전이의 관계 연구 = 43
• 2. 전이풍토와 전이의 관계 연구 = 46
• 3. 원전이 관련 연구 = 48
• 4. 예측 변인별 연구의 비교와 논의 = 51
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 69
• A. 연구모형 = 69
• B. 연구대상 = 70
• C. 연구도구 = 77
• D. 연구절차 = 85
• E. 자료분석 = 97
• Ⅳ. 연구 결과 = 103
• A. 인구통계학적 변인에 따른 차이 검증 결과 = 103
• B. 변인간의 상관관계 분석 = 103
• C. 구조방정식 모형에 의한 연구가설 검증 = 105
• Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 = 119
• A. 연구목적 및 결과 = 119
• B. 연구결과에 대한 논의 = 121
• C. 연구결과의 시사점 = 131
• D. 연구의 제한점 및 후속연구를 위한 제언 = 139
• 참고문헌 = 143
• 부록 1. 학업성취도(이해도 영역) 평가 = 161
• 부록 2. 1차 설문지 = 171
• 부록 3. 2차 설문지 = 178
• 부록 4. 인구통계학적 변인에 따른 차이검증 결과 = 182
• 부록 5. 공분산 행렬 = 188
• ABSTRACT = 189

참고문헌 (Reference)

1. 타당도와 신뢰도, 성태제, 良書院, , 1996

2. Support system for training, Nadler, , 1971

3. 변량분석과 회귀분석, 박광배, 학지사, , 1999

4. Assessing metacognitive awareness, Schraw, Dennison, , 1994

5. Training in organization(4th ed.), Goldstein, Ford, , 2002

6. T he wild world of problem solving, Schoenfeld, The wild world of problem solving, , 1983

7. The Coming of the New Organization, Drucker, The coming of the new organization, , 1988

8. The conditions of learning. 4th ed, Gagn?, , 1985

9. (AMOS) 구조방정식 모형분석, 김계수, 데이타솔루션, AMOS 구조방정식 모형 분석, , 2001

10. Dualdimensionality oftraining transfer, Laker, Dual dimensionality of training transfer, , 1990

11. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Bandura.A, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, , 1997

12. Designing Instruction fortheAdultLearner, Richey, Designing instruction for the adult learner, , 1992

13. EvaluationTrainingPrograms:Thefourlevels, Kirkpatrick, Evaluation training programs: The four levels, , 1994

14. Theories supporting transfer of training, McLean, Yamnill, , 2001

15. Metacognition in basic skills instruction, Gourgey, , 1998

16. Promoting general metacognitive awareness, Schraw, , 1998

17. Theory and practiceofteachingfor transfer, Butterfield, Nelson, , 1989

18. Validation of a transfer climate instrument, Bates, Holton, Seyler, , 1996

19. Improving learning transfer in organizations, Holton, Ed, Jossey-Bass, , 2003

20. The science of training: a decade ofprogress, Salas, Cannon Bowers, The science of training: A decade of progress, , 2001

21. TransferofTraining:AnUpdateReview andAnalysis, Ford, Weissbein, Transfer of Training: An Update Review and Analysis, , 1997

22. Training and Development in Work Organizations, G.Yukl, Tennenbaum, Training and development in work organizations, , 1998

23. 3일만에 끝낼 수 있는 구조방정식모델, 조현철, 3일만에 끝낼 수 있는 구조방정식 모델, , 2003

24. Community of practice: The organizational frontier, Wenger, Snyder, , 2000

25. Current directions in self research: self-efficacy, Pajares, , 1996

26. The evaluation and enhancement of training transfer, Olsen, , 1998

27. 직무교육 훈련의 유효성과 그 영향요인, 김진모, , 1997

28. Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling, Bandalos, Finney, , 2001

29. 판매교육 학습전이와 전이풍토간의 관계, 권대봉, 현영섭, 한국교육학회, "교육학연구, , 2003

30. Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods, Phillips, Jack J, Gulf, Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods, , 1983

31. Predicting immediate andlonger term transfer of training, Yearta, Axtell, Maitlis, , 1997

32. The relation of special training to general intelligence, Judd, , 1908

33. 업무환경이 교육훈련의 전이에 미치는 영향, 김종인, 박성준, 한국인사·조직학회, "인사조직연구, , 2001

34. Developing managerial competency as learning transfer agents, Bates, , 2000

35. Developmentofageneralized learning transfer system inventory, Holton, Ruona, , 2000

36. Transfer of learning : cognition, instruction, and reasoning, Haskell, Robert E, Academic Press, "Transfer of learning: Cognition, , 2001

37. (LISREL(SIMPLIS)을 이용한) 구조방정식모형의 분석, 김기영, 강현철, LISREL(SIMPLIS)을 이용한 구조방정식모형의 분석, , 2001

38. Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problemsolutions, Ander son, Skill acquisition: compilation of weak method problem solutions, , 1987

39. Kirkpatrick‘s levels of training criteria; Thirty years later, Janak.E.A, Alliger, Kirkpatrick's levels of training criteria: thirty years later, , 1989

40. FactorsAffecting theOpportunity to Perform Trained Taskson theJob, Sorra, Ford, Sego, , 1992

41. Personality and job performance: evidence of incremental validity, Silverman, Day, , 1989

42. 실행공동체 활성화를 위한 조직적 지원전략 탐구, 정재삼, 금혜진, , 2003

43. Item Parceling in Structural Equation Models for Optimum Solutions, Holt, , 2004

44. Partnerships for training transfer: lessons from a corporate study, Montesino, Brinkerhoff, , 1995

45. Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, ura, Social foundation of thought and action; a social cognitive theory, , 1986

46. Influence of Metacognitive Knowledge and Aptitudeon Problem Solving, Swanson, Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving, , 1990

47. TrainingforImpact:How tolinktrainingtobusinessneedsandmeasuretheresults, Robinson, Training for impact: How to link training to business needs and measure the results, , 1989

48. Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon, Perkins, Salomon, Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon, , 1989

49. 실천학습에서의 전이촉진 요인 규명에 관한 현장 연구, 노혜란, , 2004

50. 조직내 교육 훈련의 학습 및 전이 효과 모델 검증 연구, 이도형, 한국심리학회, "한국심리학회지, , 1996

51. Expanding the transfer of training domain of structured on th job training, Jacobs, Lee, , 2002

52. An empirical study into thelearning transfer process in management training, Huczynski, Lewis, , 1980

53. The forum report: e-Learning adoption rates and barriers. In A. Rossett(Ed.), Simmons, , 2002

54. The Influence of job and career attitudes on learning motivation and transfer, Cheng, , 2001

55. Posttraining strategies forfacilitationpositivetransfer:Anempiricalexploration, Wexley, Baldwin, Post training strategies for facilitation positive transfer: An empirical exploration, , 1986

56. 초인지 훈련이 초인지와 수학적 문제해결력에 미치는 효과, 김남순, 이은진, 경상대학교 중등교육연구소, "중등교육연구, , 2001

57. Effects of knowledge abstraction with anchored instruction on learning transfer, Shyu, Shih, Chen, , 1997

58. Trainee's attributes and attitudes : Neglectedinfluencesoftrainingeffectiveness, Noe, Trainees' attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences of training effectiveness, , 1986

59. The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. In S. M. Cormier, & J. D. Hagman(Eds.), Gick, Holyoak, "The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. In S. M. Cormier, , 1987

60. Informal learning and t the transfer of learning: How managers develop proficiency, Bell, Enos, Kehrhahn, , 2003

61. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2nd ed.), Creswell, "Research design: Qualitative, , 2003

62. 자기조절학습의 단계와 구성요인 규명. 미간행 박사학위논 문, 권성연, "자기조절학습의 단계와 구성 요인 규명, , 2003

63. Creating a climate for learning transfer, In E. F. Holton Ⅲ, & T. T. Baldwin(Eds.), Gilley, Hoekstra, "Creating a climate for learning transfer, , 2003

64. A longitudinal quasi-experiment on the effects of post training transfer interventions, Saks, Gaudine, , 2004

65. Constructing natural experiments, In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Harty, & K. E. Newcomer(Eds.), Rog, "Constructing natural experiments, , 1994

66. Relapse prevention for managerial training: a model for maintenance of behavior change, Marx, , 1982

67. 기업 교육훈련에서의 학습 및 전이 모형 개발을 위한 탐색적 연구, 김성완, 김재훈, 한국기업교육학회, "기업교육연구, , 2003

68. 초등학교 아동의 초인지 수준, 귀인 양식, 과제성취간의 관계분석, 백소영, 부산대학교, "초등학교 아동의 초인지 수준, , 1996

69. The Knowledge-Creating Company : How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, Nonaka, I., The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, , 1995

70. Embeddingmetacognitive cues into hypermedia systems to promote far transferproblem solving, Foster, Lin, , 1994

71. Medical fellows tell stories of application: A grounded theory on the dynamics of transfer, Reznich, Sleight, Yelon, , 1997

72. Toward construct validation of a transfer climate instrument and improving positive transfer, Carvalho, Holton, Seyler, , 1997

73. Effectiveness of Training in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis of Design and Evaluation Features, Bell, Arthur, Edens, , 2003

74. Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Schunk, , 1989

75. The effects of a mastery practice design on learning and transfer in behavior modeling training, May, Kahnweiler, , 2000

76. Analogical processes in learning. In J. R. Anderson(Eds.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition, Norman, Rumelhart, "Analogical processes in learning. In J. R. Anderson(Eds.), , 1981

77. The influence of motivation to transfer, action planning, andmanager support on the transfer process, Foxon, "The influence of motivation to transfer, , 1997

78. Workforce training transfer: study of the effect of relapse prevention training and transfer climate, Burke L.A, Baldwin, , 1999

79. Separability of metacognition andcognition : Problem solving in learning disabled and regularstudent s, Bell, Slife, Weiss, Separability of metacognition and cognition : problem solving in learning disabled and regular students, , 1985

80. The case for the prosecution: transfer as an epiphenomenon. In D. K. Detterman, & R. J. Sternberg(Eds.), Detterman, "The case for the prosecution: transfer as an epiphenomenon. In D. K. Detterman, , 1993

81. Self-efficacy expectancy, outcome expectancy and outcome value: Relative effects on behavioral intentions, Maddux, Norton, Stoltenberg, "Self-efficacy expectancy, , 1986

82. Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: a meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research, Colquitt, Noe, Lepine, , 2000

83. Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision-making, Wood, ura, Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision-making, , 1989

84. Exploratory field study of training motivation: Influence of involvement, credibility, and transfer climate, Dobbins, Ladd, Clark, "Exploratory field study of training motivation; Influence of involvement, , 1993

85. Examining the effect of organizational support, management support, and peer support on transfer of training, Cromwell, Susan Elyse, The Pennsylvania State University, "Examining the effect of organizational support, , 2000

86. An analysis of the determinants of near transfer and far transfer of training in a management training program, Cvercko, , 1994

87. Change, transfer, climate, and customer orientation: A contextual model and analysis of change driven training, Lehman, Bennett, Forst, "Change, , 1999

88. Organizational training and signals of importance: Effects of pre-training perceptions on intentions to transfer, Baldwin, Magjuka, , 1991

89. Invited reaction: cultivating problem-solving skills through problem-based approaches to professional development, Mayer, , 2002

90. Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer, Gully, Ford, Smith, Weissbein, "Relationships of goal orientation, , 1998

91. Applications of cognitive, skill-based and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation, Salas, Ford, Kraiger, "Applications of cognitive, , 1993

92. 조직 구성원의 지식기여에 대한 평가 및 보상이 지식기여도에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 사례연구, 김효근, 성은숙, 이현주, , 2002

93. Transfer is personal: Equipping trainees with self-management and relapse prevention strategies. In E. F. Holton Ⅲ & T. T. Baldwin(Eds.), Burke, Marx, , 2003

94. Introduction and overview: metacognition and motivation as determinants of effective learning and understanding. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe(Eds.), Weinert, , 1987

95. Convincing quasi-experiments: The interrupted time series and regression-discontinuity design. In J. S. wholey, H. P. Harty, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Marcantonia, Cook, "Convincing quasi-experiments: The interrupted time series and regression-discontinuity design. In J. S. wholey, , 1994

96. Leaning within a learner control training environment: The interactive effects of goal orientation and metacognitive instruction on learning outcomes, Ford, Schmidt, , 2003

97. Capturing and modeling planning expertise in anesthesiology: Results of a field study. In C. E. Zsambok & G. Klein(Eds.), Naturalistic decision making (pp.197-205), Doyle, Xiao, Milgram, "Capturing and modeling planning expertise in anesthesiology: Results of a field study. In C. E. Zsambok & G. Klein(Eds.), , 1997

98. The application of cognitive constructs and principles to the instructional systems model of training: Implications for needs assessment, design and transfer. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson(Ed.), Ford, Kraiger, "The application of cognitive constructs and principles to the instructional systems model of training: Implications for needs assessment, , 1995