株式會社 理事會의 活性化 方案 = (A) Study on the Board of Director in Corporation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Korean commercial law made the competence of the general meeting of stockholders reduced and that of the board of directors strengthened, by adopting the board of directors' collective principle from the past general meeting's collective principle with accepting the system of the board of directors in Anglo - americam laws .
Nevertheless, when we look into how our enterprises have managed for more 30 years, we find out that they have not got out of premordern backwardness and have managed in the form of private enterprises or closed companies.
Accordingly, apart from its original intentions -caused by the irregular management of business, the irrational administration and formalization of the board of directors, the autocracy and running alone of the representative director and so on-the board of directors, in a position that must direct executive bodies including a representative director, fall to an organization which inversely is under orders form the representative director, and finally cannot afford to accept interior and outside needs for enterprises.
Therefore I will reveal some problems of the board of directors in our corporations which lose functions as an organization which directs and advises top management, judges its decisions, and appoints it. And also I will compare and examine with every nation's legislations, and then conclude that we need t o improve the management of the board director by improving selection methods of board like, the adoption of the documentary decision system, the limitation of openess of the board of director's minutes, culmuative voting and so on, in addition to, as the devices which activate the system of board, ① the seperation of ownership and management, ② the enactment of ouside directors and ③ the constitution of the standing executive committee under the board of diretors, and introducing the dual structure mouvelle in French commercial laws. Finally I'll propose legislative plans about these.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅲ
• 第1章 序論 = 1
• 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究의 範團 및 方法 = 3
• 第2章 다른 나라의 理事會 制度 = 5
• 第1節 序說 = 5
• 第2節 美國 = 6
• 第1項 理事會의 構成 = 7
• 第2項 理寧會의 權限 = 9
• 第3項 社外理事制度 = 10
• 第3節 獨逸 = 12
• 第1項 理事會의 構咸 = 12
• 第2項 理事會의 業務 執行 權限 = 14
• 第4節 프랑스 = 15
• 第1項 驪事會의 構咸 = 16
• 第2項 理事會의 權限 = 17
• 第5節 日本 = 19
• 第1項 理事會의 構咸 = 20
• 第2項 理寧會의 權限 = 21
• 第3章 우리나라의 理事會制度 = 24
• 第1節 理事會의 意義 = 24
• 第2節 理事會의 構咸 = 27
• 第3節 理事會의 召集 = 29
• 第1項 召集權者 = 30
• 第2項 召集節次 = 31
• 第4節 理事會의 權限 = 32
• 第1項 業務執行의 意思決定 = 32
• 第2項 職務 執行 監督權 = 35
• 第5節 理事會 構咸員의 責任 = 36
• 第1項 會社에 대한 責任 = 36
• 第2項 第三者에 대한 責任 = 38
• 第4章 理事會制度의 問題點과 그 活性化方案 = 40
• 第1節 序說 - 理事會 運營 現況 = 40
• 第2節 所有와 經營의 分離追求 = 43
• 第3節 社外 理事制度의 法定化 = 46
• 第4節 理事會 直屬의 下部委員會의 法制化 = 49
• 第5節 理事會 運營의 改善 = 54
• 第1項 書面決議制度의 採擇 = 55
• 第2項 理事會議事錄의 公開制限 = 61
• 第3項 理事 選任 方法의 改善 = 62
• 第6節 프랑스 商事會社法上 二重 構造的 理事會制度의 導入與否 = 63
• 第5章 結論 = 67