키질석굴과 골굴석굴의 비교사적 연구 = A Comparative Study of Korean Golgul Cave-temple and the Kizil Cave-temple Cave 38, and Cave 47

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Recently, the Korean Golgul Cave-temple has attracted attention as research comparing it with the world-class Cave-temple has begun in earnest. If the previous work compared the Cave-temple in India and China, this article compares the Cave-temple on the Silk Road and the Golgul Cave-temple, which served as a link between the Indian Cave-temple and the Chinese Cave-temple. The first of the Silk Road Cave-temples to emerge is the Kizil Cave-temple. This article compares the Kizil Cave-temple and the Golgul Cave-temple. The Kizil Cave-temple is studied by Cave 38 and Cave 47, while the Golgul Cave-temple is studied by Worship Cave and Rock-Cut Buddha.
The Golgul Cave-temple is a famous Cave-temple temple that inherits the world's Cave-temple tradition. If Seokguram is a creative Cave-temple, the Golgul Cave-temple inherits the orthodox Cave-temple. The restoration of the Golgul Cave-temple will be an opportunity to shed light on the value and meaning of our country's Cave-temple.
The Kizil Cave-temple is located in Kucha, the largest oasis city in the Western Regions, along with Hotan in the Western Regions, and was created during the Kucha Kingdom, when Buddhism flourished around the 3rd century. This article considers the geographical characteristics of the Kizil Cave-temple, the plunder of the powers, the distribution of Cave-temple, the structure of Cave-temple, the transformation of the Cave-temple format, and the significance of Cave-temple. The typical structure of the Kizil Cave-temple is the Center Column Format. This form of Cave-temple is created as a problem of structural safety. In addition, the writer investigate the Kizil Cave-temple in the field to consider the structure and spatial composition of Cave 38 and Cave 47. Contrary to the interpretation that the diamond-shaped mural symbolizes Sumisan Mountain(Sumeru), it is interpreted as barley or lotus petals, the leaves of the spatial tree. The Kizil Cave Temple is believed to have creatively implemented the symbolic scheme of early Indian Stupa to address the structural limitations under load.
In addition, the Golgul Cave-temple's Worship Cave and Rock-Cut Buddha were compared to the Kizil Cave-temple Cave 38, and Cave 47. So we looked at each other's commonalities and differences. Although they reveal differences in structural limitations that arise in natural conditions, they were found in common in the form of worship and a large Buddha statue caves.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 문명대, "한국 석굴사원의 연구" 역사학회 38 : 90-91, 1968

2 마쓰창, "중국 불교석굴" 다홀미디어 2006

3 문명대, "정통석굴사원 골굴사의 문화와 석굴구조" 사.한국미술사연구소 2016

4 김준오, "인도 초기 Stupa 형식 연구 : Relief Stupa 분석을 중심으로" 전남대학교 대학원 2012

5 이분희, "용문석굴 고양동과 골굴석굴의 비교연구" 한국불교미술사학회 (54) : 47-66, 2020

6 문명대, "실크로드의 석굴" 한국미술사연구소 2015

7 한지연, "서역의 불교발전과 교류에 관한 연구" 동국대학교 대학원 2007

8 임영애, "서역불교조각사" 일지사 1996

9 강삼혜, "북제 북향당산석굴 북대굴(9굴)과 경주 골굴석굴 비교연구" 한국불교미술사학회 (54) : 117-149, 2020

10 손신영, "기록을 통해 본 조선후기 骨窟石窟의 양상" 한국불교미술사학회 (50) : 67-86, 2018

11 문명대, "골굴석굴의 구조형식과 아잔타 10굴" 사.한국미술사연구소, 한국불교미술사학회 51 : 2018

12 문명대, "골굴사(骨窟寺) 석굴구조와 마애 장륙 석가불좌상(丈六釋迦佛坐像)의 의의" 한국불교미술사학회 (50) : 21-42, 2018

13 문명대, "골굴 석굴과 중국 석굴" 사.한국미술사연구소 2018

14 주수완, "골굴 석굴과 인도 카를라 석굴의 비교고찰" 한국불교미술사학회 (51) : 73-89, 2018

15 문명대, "골굴 석굴과 인도 석굴" 사.한국미술사연구소 2017

16 심주완, "골굴 석굴과 실크로드 석굴" 사.한국미술사연구소 2019

17 문명대, "골굴 석굴과 실크로드 석굴" 사.한국미술사연구소 2019

18 손영문, "골굴 석굴과 실크로드 석굴" 사.한국미술사연구소 2019

19 유미나, "간송미술관 소장 <골굴 석굴도>의 작가와 회화적 재현 방식 고찰" 한국불교미술사학회 (50) : 43-66, 2018

20 林玲愛, "西域 塑造像의 연구" 梨花女子大學校 大學院 1994

21 魏正中, "區段與組合 : 龜玆石窟寺院遺址的考古學探索" 上海古籍出版社 2013

22 廖旸, "克孜爾石窟壁畵年代學究" 社会科学文献出版社 2012

23 문무왕, "中國 初期石窟에 나타난 法華信仰의 특징 -北魏時代를 중심으로-" 한국선학회 (31) : 257-291, 2012

24 イグル自治區文物管理委員會, "キジル石窟 1, 2, 3" 平凡社 1985

25 宿白, "キジル石窟 1" 平凡社 1983