녹색소비정책의 소비자지향성 비교 평가 연구 = Comparative Analysis of Consumer-orientation of Green Consumption Policy

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Just as that the more consumer-oriented the products companies provide the higher the consumers’ voluntary acceptance gets, so is that the higher the consumer-orientation of policy the higher the relevant policy raises people’s voluntary acceptance and can successfully attain the goal of the policy. In this study, I carried out an empirical analysis based on the evaluation index of the consumer orientation towards government policy. As a result of the empirical analysis, consumer orientation scores were drew as 52.19 points in eco mileage system, 50.02 points in CO2 cashbag, and 49.74 points in carbon mileage system. As a result of diagnosing each subsection reflecting a weighting on a 5-point scale, it was found that ‘diversity of consumer selection’ in the selection sector should be a priority of the present green consumption policy. Government should try to more diversify participation methods suitably for consumers’ situation and incentive selection. Further, it needs to be comprised of what the selecting objects or consumers truly want and need, through incentive. I also think this is the time to investigate consumer satisfaction and requirement of the present incentive. Next, it was found that an effort for ‘information durability’ in information sector is required. For this, there are ways of using homepage, smartphone and SNS. Finding and supporting good examples and utilizing these as contents of offering information are also one of the efficient methods. In safety sector, it was found that an effort of ‘whether or not the range of consumer damage is determined’ should be a priority, which requires a measure that includes consumer groups excluded from the relevant program and a measure that participating consumers can trust by concretely specifying the responsible subject of incentive payment and use through the relevant regulation. In the participation sector, as ‘the government’s interaction-typed suitability of consumers and companies’ was evaluated relatively insufficient, the government will have to set up a long-term and virtuous cyclic role model for securing consumer orientation and attaining goals of green consumption program.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 환경부, "환경통계연감, 제23호" 2010

2 고재경, "탄소포인트제 평가 및 개선 방안" 경기개발연구원 2010

3 "탄소캐쉬백 홈페이지"

4 지식경제부, "탄소캐쉬백 제도 추진 발표"

5 "탄소마일리지 제도 홈페이지"

6 환경부, "지자체 기후변화 대응 가이드라인 연구" 2009

7 배민기, "지방자치단체의 탄소포인트제도 활성화 방안" 22 (22): 91-104, 2011

8 신민경, "정부정책의 소비자지향성 평가지표 개발 : 녹색관련 정책을 바탕으로 한 CVR 평가 및 AHP 분석" 이화여자대학교 2012

9 박성용, "정부 분야별 정책․제도의 소비자지향성 연구" 한국소비자원 2010

10 "에코마일리지 제도 홈페이지"

11 에너지관리공단, "에너지기후변화편람2012"

12 에너지관리공단, "에너지기후변화편람2010"

13 강병모, "소비자지향적 정책과정을 위한 정책마케팅 전략 분석 - 소비자정책에의 적용 -" 한국거버넌스학회 15 (15): 49-76, 2008

14 송인숙, "소비자관점에서 본 방송통신 정책 성과평가 항목 및 지표 개발" 한국소비자원 40 (40): 27-45, 2011

15 김정란, "소비자 지향 브랜드 커뮤니케이션 공간 디자인에 관한 연구" 홍익대학교 2005

16 이석근, "방송통신을 활용한 탄소 포인트, 마일리지 활성화 방안 연구" Arthur D. Little 2009

17 배태진, "녹색소비정책 비교 연구" 숙명여자대학교 2010

18 손상희, "녹색소비역량의 구성체계와 측정지표에 관한 연구" 한국소비자정책교육학회 6 (6): 95-119, 2010

19 박용찬, "녹색소비 활성화를 위한 인센티브제도 지원 방안-탄소캐쉬백을 중심으로" 지식경제부 2010

20 황애선, "녹색소비 활성화 정책의 합목적성 연구 : 국내 주요 녹색소비 활성화 정책을 중심으로" 세종대학교 2010

21 배순영, "녹색소비 인센티브제도 활성화 방안" 한국소비자원 2011

22 변용찬, "녹색성장과 생활환경" 한국보건사회연구원 2009

23 명수정, "녹색생활양식 확산을 통한 온실가스 감축방안 연구" 한국환경정책평가연구원 2010

24 황은애, "기업웹사이트의 소비자정보지행성이 의사결정 사고비용에 미치는 영향" 한국소비자학회 16 (16): 33-53, 2005

25 조근태, "계층분석적 의사결정" 동현출판사 2005

26 에너지절약전문기업협회, "esco 에티즌 마당 - ‘탄소캐쉬백’ 제도란?"

27 European Commission, "The Consumer Markets Scoreboard 2nd edition" Directorate-General for Health&Consumers 2009

28 Saaty, L. Thomas, "The Analytic Hierarchy Process" MacGraw-Hill 1980

29 Lynn, M. R., "Determination and quantification of content validity" 35 : 382-385, 1986

30 Lawrence E. Rose, "Consumer Protection Policy-Making in Norway and the Unite States: A Research Note" 29 : 2006

31 신민경, "CVR 평가 및 AHP 분석을 이용한 정부정책의 소비자지향성 평가지표 개발" 한국소비자학회 23 (23): 67-95, 2012

32 Lawshe, C. H., "A quantitative approach to content validity" 28 (28): 563-575, 1975

33 에너지경제연구원, "(제5차)에너지이용합리화 기본계획 수립연구"