RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    수업장학의 이론과 실제에 관한 교사, 학교행정가, 장학사의 지각 분석 = (An) Analysis of Perception of Teachers, School Administratiors and Supervisors about Theory and Practice of Instructional Supervision

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T2297041

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    A. Purpose and Problems of Study
    The purpose of this study is to find out the problems when instructional supervision is applied in school setting, To achieve this purpose; following problems are proposed.
    1) What is the perception of teachers, school administrators and supervisors about theory of instructional supervision?
    2) What is the perception of teachers, school administrators and supervisors about pratice of instructional supervision?
    3) What is the differences between theory and practice perceived by teachers, school administrators and supervisors?
    4) What is the problems when instructional supervision is applied in school setting?
    B. Method
    1) Subjects
    The subjects are consisted with 105 teachers, 30 school administrators, 30 supervisors at Pusan city.
    2) Tool
    "The questionaire on instructional supervision" constructed by the researcher was administrated. It was consisted with 53 items. 46 items were designed for measuring theoretical, practical phases of instructional supervision, and 7 items were designed for measuring problems when instructional supervision is applied in school setting.
    C. Results
    majors findings are as follows:
    1. There are positive perception of teachers, school administrators and supervisors about theories of instructional supervision, though there are differences among teachers, school administrators and supervisors.
    2. Teacher only positively perceived practical phases of instructional supervision. And, school administrators and supervisors take a middle position
    3. There are differences between theory and practice of instructional supervision perceived by teachers, school administrators and supervisors
    4. There are more differences between theory and practice of instructional supervision perceived by teachers than school administrators and supervisors.
    D. Conclusions
    1. Instructional supervision, aim at improvement of instruction and learning process, should be applied in school setting. And it is necessary to develop models of instructional supervision that is corresponding with our situation.
    2. It is necessary to recrute those who have professional knowledge and skills for instructional supervision.
    3. Teachers, school administrators and supervisors should be trained to remove the teacher's negative attitudes about supervision and supervisor's bureaucratic thought.
    번역하기

    A. Purpose and Problems of Study The purpose of this study is to find out the problems when instructional supervision is applied in school setting, To achieve this purpose; following problems are proposed. 1) What is the perception of teachers, scho...

    A. Purpose and Problems of Study
    The purpose of this study is to find out the problems when instructional supervision is applied in school setting, To achieve this purpose; following problems are proposed.
    1) What is the perception of teachers, school administrators and supervisors about theory of instructional supervision?
    2) What is the perception of teachers, school administrators and supervisors about pratice of instructional supervision?
    3) What is the differences between theory and practice perceived by teachers, school administrators and supervisors?
    4) What is the problems when instructional supervision is applied in school setting?
    B. Method
    1) Subjects
    The subjects are consisted with 105 teachers, 30 school administrators, 30 supervisors at Pusan city.
    2) Tool
    "The questionaire on instructional supervision" constructed by the researcher was administrated. It was consisted with 53 items. 46 items were designed for measuring theoretical, practical phases of instructional supervision, and 7 items were designed for measuring problems when instructional supervision is applied in school setting.
    C. Results
    majors findings are as follows:
    1. There are positive perception of teachers, school administrators and supervisors about theories of instructional supervision, though there are differences among teachers, school administrators and supervisors.
    2. Teacher only positively perceived practical phases of instructional supervision. And, school administrators and supervisors take a middle position
    3. There are differences between theory and practice of instructional supervision perceived by teachers, school administrators and supervisors
    4. There are more differences between theory and practice of instructional supervision perceived by teachers than school administrators and supervisors.
    D. Conclusions
    1. Instructional supervision, aim at improvement of instruction and learning process, should be applied in school setting. And it is necessary to develop models of instructional supervision that is corresponding with our situation.
    2. It is necessary to recrute those who have professional knowledge and skills for instructional supervision.
    3. Teachers, school administrators and supervisors should be trained to remove the teacher's negative attitudes about supervision and supervisor's bureaucratic thought.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차 = 1
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 6
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 6
    • 2. 연구문제 = 8
    • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 9
    • 목차 = 1
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 6
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 6
    • 2. 연구문제 = 8
    • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 9
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 10
    • 1. 수업장학의 개념 및 성격 = 10
    • 2. 수업장학의 절차 = 16
    • 3. 교사와 장학사의 인간관계 = 21
    • 4. 수업장학의 기본 가정 = 24
    • 5. 수업장학에 대한 교사, 학교행정가, 장학사의 지각 = 28
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 32
    • 1. 연구대상 = 32
    • 2. 검사도구 = 33
    • 3. 자료처리 = 34
    • Ⅳ. 결과 해석 및 논의 = 35
    • 1. 수업장학의 이론적 측면에 대한 교사, 학교행정가, 장학사의 지각 = 35
    • 2. 수업장학의 실제적 측면에 대한 교사, 학교행정가, 장학사의 지각 = 39
    • 3. 교사, 학교행정가, 장학사가 지각하는 수업장학의 이론적 측면과 실제적 측면간의 차이 = 44
    • 4. 교사, 학교행정가, 장학사가 지각하는 수업장학의 이론적 측면과 실제적 측면간의 지각차들간의 차이 = 48
    • 5. 수업장학의 학교현장 적용을 위한 문제점 = 53
    • Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론 = 62
    • 참고문헌 = 66
    • 부록 = 71
    • 수업장학에 관한 설문지 = 71
    • Abstract = 78
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼