RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    지구단위계획에서의 경관영향평가 기법에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10686726

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      광주 : 조선대학교 대학원, 2006

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 조선대학교 대학원 , 건축공학과 , 2006. 8

    • 발행연도

      2006

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      539.7 판사항(4)

    • DDC

      712 판사항(21)

    • 발행국(도시)

      광주

    • 기타서명

      (A)Study on techniques of landscape impact assessment in district unit plan

    • 형태사항

      ⅵ, 63 p. : 삽화 ; 26 cm.

    • 일반주기명

      지도교수: 조용준
      참고문헌: p.62-63

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 조선대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Our society shows increasing trend to deal with view as important factors of development program with increase of concerns and demands of quality of urban environment and in particular, it has been important factor of view impact evaluation program with legalization of district unit program system.
    However, in spite of importance of view impact evaluation, case of its actualization was extremely little due to short period of execution and evaluation method was not settled and verification of it has not made.
    Therefore, results of examining and analyzing view impact techniques with 8 district unit programs in Jeonnam region since legalization of district unit program centering around process and evaluation items are as follows.
    1. View impact evaluation is composed of three stages such as analysis of natural and artificial environment and planning factor, prediction of view impact based on these and quantitative and qualitative view impact measurement and cases of view impact evaluation through three stages are merely half (50%).
    2. Natural and humane environment and planning factor analysis which are the subjects of view impact evaluation and the most fundamental aspects in view impact evaluation were conducted at all survey regions, but there was a great deviation by survey items. Since it may be resulted by regional conditions and connected to inferior evaluation, analysis and suggestion for such geography, vegetation, land use, architectural conditions and road are needed.
    3. 2/3 of the whole simulation (75%) were used and CG was most by used items, followed by photo composition and sketch. The most important perspective and selection of view point of middle and near distance in predicting simulation are merely half of survey subjects.
    4. Measurement of view impact as verification stage is merely half of survey subjects (50%) and there is no qualitative prediction by items and use of Maertens law which is quantitative evaluation is found.
    View impact evaluation of planning in district unit program was not settled or neglected and since it has arbitrary potential of prediction with inferior impact evaluation, three stages of structurization of natural and humane environment - simulation - qualitative and quantitative evaluation should be kept for view impact evaluation of high quality and selection of efficient evaluation items and its reasons should be defined.
    This study needs complement of research on quality of post evaluation centering around process and evaluation items of view impact evaluation.
    번역하기

    Our society shows increasing trend to deal with view as important factors of development program with increase of concerns and demands of quality of urban environment and in particular, it has been important factor of view impact evaluation program wi...

    Our society shows increasing trend to deal with view as important factors of development program with increase of concerns and demands of quality of urban environment and in particular, it has been important factor of view impact evaluation program with legalization of district unit program system.
    However, in spite of importance of view impact evaluation, case of its actualization was extremely little due to short period of execution and evaluation method was not settled and verification of it has not made.
    Therefore, results of examining and analyzing view impact techniques with 8 district unit programs in Jeonnam region since legalization of district unit program centering around process and evaluation items are as follows.
    1. View impact evaluation is composed of three stages such as analysis of natural and artificial environment and planning factor, prediction of view impact based on these and quantitative and qualitative view impact measurement and cases of view impact evaluation through three stages are merely half (50%).
    2. Natural and humane environment and planning factor analysis which are the subjects of view impact evaluation and the most fundamental aspects in view impact evaluation were conducted at all survey regions, but there was a great deviation by survey items. Since it may be resulted by regional conditions and connected to inferior evaluation, analysis and suggestion for such geography, vegetation, land use, architectural conditions and road are needed.
    3. 2/3 of the whole simulation (75%) were used and CG was most by used items, followed by photo composition and sketch. The most important perspective and selection of view point of middle and near distance in predicting simulation are merely half of survey subjects.
    4. Measurement of view impact as verification stage is merely half of survey subjects (50%) and there is no qualitative prediction by items and use of Maertens law which is quantitative evaluation is found.
    View impact evaluation of planning in district unit program was not settled or neglected and since it has arbitrary potential of prediction with inferior impact evaluation, three stages of structurization of natural and humane environment - simulation - qualitative and quantitative evaluation should be kept for view impact evaluation of high quality and selection of efficient evaluation items and its reasons should be defined.
    This study needs complement of research on quality of post evaluation centering around process and evaluation items of view impact evaluation.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • ABSTRACT
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1.1. 연구의 배경 = 1
    • 1.2. 연구의 목적 = 3
    • 1.3. 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 5
    • ABSTRACT
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1.1. 연구의 배경 = 1
    • 1.2. 연구의 목적 = 3
    • 1.3. 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 5
    • 1.4. 선행연구 검토 = 6
    • Ⅱ. 경관영향평가에 대한 이론적 연구 = 10
    • 2.1. 경관의 기본개념과 유형 = 10
    • 2.2. 경관파악 및 경관분석 = 14
    • 2.2.1. 경관파악 요소 = 14
    • 2.2.2. 경관분석 및 유형 = 16
    • 2.3. 시뮬레이션(simulation) 기법에 의한 경관영향 예측 = 20
    • 2.3.1. 시뮬레이션 작성 프로세스 = 20
    • 2.3.2. 시뮬레이션 기법 = 25
    • 2.4. 경관영향 측정 방법 및 판단 방법 = 27
    • Ⅲ. 조사대상지역 경관영향평가 기법 = 33
    • 3.1. 조사·분석모델 설정 = 33
    • 3.2. 금당 2지구 지구단위계획 = 35
    • 3.3. 상삼지구 지구단위계획 = 37
    • 3.4. 청계지구 지구단위계획 = 39
    • 3.5. 완도읍 가용리 지구단위계획 = 41
    • 3.6. 율포관광지 지구단위계획 = 45
    • 3.7. 장성 대도지구 지구단위계획 = 48
    • 3.8. 나주 우산지구 지구단위계획 = 50
    • 3.9. 영광 군관리계획 = 54
    • 3.10. 종합분석 = 57
    • Ⅳ. 결론 = 60
    • 참고문헌 = 62
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼