RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    글의 길이와 내용, 학생 상하 수준에 따른 고등학생의 문장 중요도 평정 차이 = Differences in High School Students’ Rating of Sentence Importance Depending on Text Length, Content, and Students’ Proficiency Levels (upper and lower)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109162177

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: This study analyzed differences in high school students’ rating of sentence importance depending on text length, content, and the students’ proficiency level(upper and lower), aiming to improve the teaching and the learning of reading.
    Methods: A test was conducted with 173 high school students in Changwon, Gyeongsangnam province. Based on the test, an analysis was performed to examine how text length and content affect the rating of importance. Additionally, participants were divided into two groups based on their proficiency levels in rating sentence importance — upper and lower — and the effects of variables within each group were analyzed.
    Results: First, text length revealed a statistically significant difference in students’ importance rating scores. Second, concerning content, no statistically significant difference was observed in the scores. Third, dividing participants into upper and lower proficiency groups based on the mean score showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Fourth, regarding text length, students in the upper group exhibited a superior ability to rate sentence importance in shorter passages compared to longer ones, and this difference was statistically significant. In contrast, for the lower group, no statistically significant difference was observed depending on the text length. Consequently, it was determined that students in the lower group face challenges in rating sentence importance regardless of text length. Fifth, concerning content, no statistically significant differences were observed in importance rating abilities for both upper and lower groups. Nevertheless, upon calculating effect sizes, it was discerned that students in both groups exhibited comparatively higher abilities in passages related to humanities than those related to the Natural Sciences.
    Conclusion: Students’ proficiency in rating sentence importance varied depending on the length of the text, while no significant difference was observed concerning the content. The upper and lower groups showed a great disparity in proficiency, and the variables that caused statistically significant differences varied depending on the proficiency level. These findings show that it is important to adjust the length and content of texts to match students’ proficiency levels when teaching reading strategies such as sentence importance rating. Furthermore, the introduction of sentence importance rating method, which visually illustrates the reading process, into teaching and learning can contribute to enhancing students’ reading abilities.
    번역하기

    Purpose: This study analyzed differences in high school students’ rating of sentence importance depending on text length, content, and the students’ proficiency level(upper and lower), aiming to improve the teaching and the learning of reading. Me...

    Purpose: This study analyzed differences in high school students’ rating of sentence importance depending on text length, content, and the students’ proficiency level(upper and lower), aiming to improve the teaching and the learning of reading.
    Methods: A test was conducted with 173 high school students in Changwon, Gyeongsangnam province. Based on the test, an analysis was performed to examine how text length and content affect the rating of importance. Additionally, participants were divided into two groups based on their proficiency levels in rating sentence importance — upper and lower — and the effects of variables within each group were analyzed.
    Results: First, text length revealed a statistically significant difference in students’ importance rating scores. Second, concerning content, no statistically significant difference was observed in the scores. Third, dividing participants into upper and lower proficiency groups based on the mean score showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Fourth, regarding text length, students in the upper group exhibited a superior ability to rate sentence importance in shorter passages compared to longer ones, and this difference was statistically significant. In contrast, for the lower group, no statistically significant difference was observed depending on the text length. Consequently, it was determined that students in the lower group face challenges in rating sentence importance regardless of text length. Fifth, concerning content, no statistically significant differences were observed in importance rating abilities for both upper and lower groups. Nevertheless, upon calculating effect sizes, it was discerned that students in both groups exhibited comparatively higher abilities in passages related to humanities than those related to the Natural Sciences.
    Conclusion: Students’ proficiency in rating sentence importance varied depending on the length of the text, while no significant difference was observed concerning the content. The upper and lower groups showed a great disparity in proficiency, and the variables that caused statistically significant differences varied depending on the proficiency level. These findings show that it is important to adjust the length and content of texts to match students’ proficiency levels when teaching reading strategies such as sentence importance rating. Furthermore, the introduction of sentence importance rating method, which visually illustrates the reading process, into teaching and learning can contribute to enhancing students’ reading abilities.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김영주, "텍스트 종류에 따른 요약하기 전략 연구" 조선대학교 교육대학원 2010

    2 김명순, "텍스트 구조와 사전 지식이 내용 이해와 중요도 평정에 미치는 영향" 韓國敎員大學校 大學院 1998

    3 문선모 ; 차시호, "질문생성⋅교재 의미연결성⋅선행지식이 고등학생의 설명적 교재의 중심내용 이해에 미치는 효과" 17 (17): 1033-1060, 2013

    4 李明順, "중심 내용 파악 전략의 현시적 수업이 독해력 향상에 미치는 효과" 梨花女子大學校 敎育大學院 1994

    5 金烽洵, "읽기 평가에 관한 비판적 고찰" 서울大學校 大學院 1992

    6 정미희, "사전 지식 활성화 프로그램이 글의 중요도 평정에 미치는 영향 연구" 대구교육대학교 교육대학원 2002

    7 황상현 ; 박영민, "명시적 중심 문장의 유무에 따른 글 내용 이해의 차이" 70 : 169-202, 2024

    8 한철우, "독서 지도 방법" 교학사 1996

    9 김선령, "글 내용의 중요도 평정 지도가 독해력 향상에 미치는 효과 연구 : 중심내용파악과 요약능력을 중심으로" 고려대학교 교육대학원 2007

    10 서울대학교 국어교육연구소, "국어교육학사전" 대교출판 1999

    1 김영주, "텍스트 종류에 따른 요약하기 전략 연구" 조선대학교 교육대학원 2010

    2 김명순, "텍스트 구조와 사전 지식이 내용 이해와 중요도 평정에 미치는 영향" 韓國敎員大學校 大學院 1998

    3 문선모 ; 차시호, "질문생성⋅교재 의미연결성⋅선행지식이 고등학생의 설명적 교재의 중심내용 이해에 미치는 효과" 17 (17): 1033-1060, 2013

    4 李明順, "중심 내용 파악 전략의 현시적 수업이 독해력 향상에 미치는 효과" 梨花女子大學校 敎育大學院 1994

    5 金烽洵, "읽기 평가에 관한 비판적 고찰" 서울大學校 大學院 1992

    6 정미희, "사전 지식 활성화 프로그램이 글의 중요도 평정에 미치는 영향 연구" 대구교육대학교 교육대학원 2002

    7 황상현 ; 박영민, "명시적 중심 문장의 유무에 따른 글 내용 이해의 차이" 70 : 169-202, 2024

    8 한철우, "독서 지도 방법" 교학사 1996

    9 김선령, "글 내용의 중요도 평정 지도가 독해력 향상에 미치는 효과 연구 : 중심내용파악과 요약능력을 중심으로" 고려대학교 교육대학원 2007

    10 서울대학교 국어교육연구소, "국어교육학사전" 대교출판 1999

    11 원진숙, "국어교육의 이해 - 국어교육의 미래를 모색하는 열여섯가지 이야기" 사회평론 2008

    12 황상현 ; 박영민, "고등학생의 문장 중요도 평정의 특징 분석" 40 (40): 75-96, 2024

    13 千漢臣, "認知發達에 따른 글 內容의 重要度 把握 能力의 發達에 관한 硏究" 서울大學校 大學院 1987

    14 徐赫, "段落·文章의 重要度 把握과 段落의 主題文 作成能力이 要約에 미치는 效果 : 說明文을 中心으로" 서울大學校 大學院 1991

    15 Baumann, J. F., "中心內容의 理解와 授業" 교육과학사 1986

    16 Hong, S., "Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using a non-Western sample" 63 (63): 636-654, 2003

    17 Johnson, R. E., "Recall of prose as a function of the structural importance of the linguistic units" 9 (9): 12-20, 1970

    18 Rasinski, T. V., "Readers’ identification of levels of importance in expository texts: An exploratory study" 1985

    19 Brown, A. L., "Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages : A problem of metacognitive development" 48 (48): 1-8, 1977

    20 Hare, V. C., "Direct instruction of summarization skills" 20 (20): 62-78, 1984

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼