RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    동아시아에서의 千字文 類 및 蒙求 類 流行과 漢字漢文 基礎敎育 = Publication of Cheonjamun(千字文) and Monggu(蒙求), and the Education of Chinese Character in East Asia

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100525673

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article surveys the aspect of publication of Cheonjamun, Monggu and their companion volumes in East Asia, especially in Korea and Japan. Cheonjamun and Monggu were widely accepted as Chinese character textbooks in East Asia. Cheonjamun which adopted the form of couplets and rhymes of old poetry was helpful for learning not only Chinese character itself but also its various writing styles. Lihan(李翰)’s Monggu also had not a few influence in East Asia. It is remarkable that Joseon edition Cheonjamun indicated Chinese character tones with dots(not all tones but Shangsheng(上聲) and qusheng(去聲) as Rusheng(入聲) was intelligible to Koreans naturally). In Joseon, Cheonjamun was also utilized in various ways in daily life; to use its characters as an ordinal number is a good example. Not a few companion volumes of Cheonjamun were edited and published even after Korean Independence Day, and editions with new system also appeared. Monggu had been widely read as an anthology of historical events, but the demands for the new edition with neo-Confucianism tendency was raised continually as neo-Confucianism developed in Joseon. Ryu Heechun (柳希春) responded to the request with his Sok-Monggu(續蒙求), but he couldn``t adopt the whole phonological structure of Monggu as it intended to retain the philosophy of Hu Bingwen(胡炳文)’s Sunjeong-Monggu(純正蒙求). In Japan, Cheonjamun and Monggu were also accepted from early period. Japanese intellectuals in 17th century, in most cases, couldn``t compose hanwen(漢文) with rhymes, but there were some who investigated rhymes very closely. Japanese intellectuals who emphasized their own history, also edited its companion volumes based on their own history and daily life. Sewa-senjimon(世話千字文) and Honcho-mogyu(本朝蒙求) are good example.
    번역하기

    This article surveys the aspect of publication of Cheonjamun, Monggu and their companion volumes in East Asia, especially in Korea and Japan. Cheonjamun and Monggu were widely accepted as Chinese character textbooks in East Asia. Cheonjamun which adop...

    This article surveys the aspect of publication of Cheonjamun, Monggu and their companion volumes in East Asia, especially in Korea and Japan. Cheonjamun and Monggu were widely accepted as Chinese character textbooks in East Asia. Cheonjamun which adopted the form of couplets and rhymes of old poetry was helpful for learning not only Chinese character itself but also its various writing styles. Lihan(李翰)’s Monggu also had not a few influence in East Asia. It is remarkable that Joseon edition Cheonjamun indicated Chinese character tones with dots(not all tones but Shangsheng(上聲) and qusheng(去聲) as Rusheng(入聲) was intelligible to Koreans naturally). In Joseon, Cheonjamun was also utilized in various ways in daily life; to use its characters as an ordinal number is a good example. Not a few companion volumes of Cheonjamun were edited and published even after Korean Independence Day, and editions with new system also appeared. Monggu had been widely read as an anthology of historical events, but the demands for the new edition with neo-Confucianism tendency was raised continually as neo-Confucianism developed in Joseon. Ryu Heechun (柳希春) responded to the request with his Sok-Monggu(續蒙求), but he couldn``t adopt the whole phonological structure of Monggu as it intended to retain the philosophy of Hu Bingwen(胡炳文)’s Sunjeong-Monggu(純正蒙求). In Japan, Cheonjamun and Monggu were also accepted from early period. Japanese intellectuals in 17th century, in most cases, couldn``t compose hanwen(漢文) with rhymes, but there were some who investigated rhymes very closely. Japanese intellectuals who emphasized their own history, also edited its companion volumes based on their own history and daily life. Sewa-senjimon(世話千字文) and Honcho-mogyu(本朝蒙求) are good example.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 沈慶昊, "한국한문기초학사(3책)" 태학사 2013

    2 강신항, "한국의 운서" 태학사 2000

    3 朴秉喆, "한국의 『四體千字文』과 일본의 『三體千字文』에 대하여" 15-33, 2013

    4 "한국금석문 종합영상시스템"

    5 "한국고전번역원 한국고전종합DB"

    6 박혜순, "한국『천자문』에 관한 고찰 : 4종『천자문』을 중심으로" 전주대학교 2009

    7 김세한, "조선조 초학 교재 연구" 계명대학교한문연구회 1981

    8 심경호, "조선전기의 註解本 간행과 문헌 가공에 대하여" 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회) (20) : 167-248, 2004

    9 류지홍, "일제 시대 한자 교재 『동천자』 연구" 고려대학교 2008

    10 심경호, "이두식 변격한문의 역사적 실상과 연구과제" 민족어문학회 (57) : 201-232, 2008

    1 沈慶昊, "한국한문기초학사(3책)" 태학사 2013

    2 강신항, "한국의 운서" 태학사 2000

    3 朴秉喆, "한국의 『四體千字文』과 일본의 『三體千字文』에 대하여" 15-33, 2013

    4 "한국금석문 종합영상시스템"

    5 "한국고전번역원 한국고전종합DB"

    6 박혜순, "한국『천자문』에 관한 고찰 : 4종『천자문』을 중심으로" 전주대학교 2009

    7 김세한, "조선조 초학 교재 연구" 계명대학교한문연구회 1981

    8 심경호, "조선전기의 註解本 간행과 문헌 가공에 대하여" 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회) (20) : 167-248, 2004

    9 류지홍, "일제 시대 한자 교재 『동천자』 연구" 고려대학교 2008

    10 심경호, "이두식 변격한문의 역사적 실상과 연구과제" 민족어문학회 (57) : 201-232, 2008

    11 이훈종, "우리 손으로 이루어진 千字文型 敎材의 探究" 27 : 43-65, 1983

    12 이근우, "왕인의 『천자문』『논어』일본 전수설 재검토" 역사문제연구소 (69) : 191-217, 2004

    13 김태오, "다산의 「兒學編」에 반영된 문자교육관" 한국교육철학회 11 : 59-80, 1993

    14 "국사편찬위원회 한국역사정보시스템"

    15 "고려대학교 민족문화연구원 해외한국학자료센터"

    16 李德懋, "靑莊館全書" 한국고전번역원 2000

    17 邵時馥, "論草書"

    18 早川光三郞, "蒙求" 明治書院 1973

    19 배현석, "續蒙求分註 版本考" 한국서지학회 (26) : 133-174, 2003

    20 "續蒙求分註"

    21 "續蒙求 4권 4책"

    22 "石峯千字文"

    23 "石峯千字文"

    24 이연순, "眉巖 柳希春의 『續蒙求』 硏究" 한국어문교육연구회 38 (38): 439-461, 2010

    25 李衡祥, "甁窩先生文集" 한국고전번역원 1996

    26 王铁钧, "王仁献书说辨疑" 2005

    27 東野治之, "正倉院文書と木簡の研究" 塙書房 1978

    28 神野志隆光, "東アジアの古典學としての韓国の古典世界" 成均館大學校東アジア學術院BK21東アジア學融合事業団 2007

    29 "本朝蒙求 3책"

    30 김훈식, "朝鮮前期에 있어서 蒙求書의 編纂" 仁濟大學校 17 (17): 2002

    31 猪口篤志, "日本漢文學史" 소명출판사 2000

    32 "日本書紀" 岩波書店 1967

    33 유영옥, "日帝下 小岡 金泰麟의 童蒙須讀千字文 분석" 동양한문학회 23 (23): 263-308, 2006

    34 "新刊千字註釋 1책"

    35 丁若鏞, "定本 與猶堂全書 詩文集 1~5" 茶山學術財團 2012

    36 한상봉, "安平大君이 쓴 임영대군 묘표(석각본)와 행초 오언율시(목각본)에 대하여" 2000

    37 정재훈, "古書解題 Ⅹ" 延世大學校 国學研究院, 平民社 2008

    38 정후수, "千字文의 구성과 가치에 대한 연구" 11 : 187-212, 1998

    39 송병렬, "千字文類의 變容과 性格 考察" 근역한문학회 30 : 441-466, 2010

    40 안미경, "千字文 간인본 연구" 이회문화사 2004

    41 "千字文"

    42 "千字文"

    43 小川環樹, "千字文" 岩波書店 367-383, 1997

    44 小川環樹, "千字文" 岩波書店 1997

    45 "千字文"

    46 梁若容, "中日文化交流史論" 商务印書馆 1985

    47 신경철, "『역대千字文』연구" 국어국문학회 95 : 37-62, 1986

    48 심경호, "『續蒙求分註』의 압운 체제 : 續撰과 創新" 한국한문학회 (47) : 415-464, 2011

    49 임동석, "『千字文』의 源流,內容 및 韓國에서의 發展 상황 考察" 중국어문학연구회 (56) : 281-304, 2009

    50 李圭景, "(國譯)分類 五洲衍文長箋散稿" 한국고전번역원 1981

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-08-18 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korea Association For Education Of Chinese Characters -> The Korea Association For Han-character and classical written language Education KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.3 0.3 0.27
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.3 0.3 0.534 0.08
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼