RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    고객반응성을 고려한 고객세분화 방법에 관한 연구 -농촌체험관광 만족도 영향요인을 중심으로- = The Segmentation Based on the Customer Response -with Factors Influencing the Satisfaction of Farm Tourism-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60056728

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this study, we suggest the mixture regression as a new method of segmenting a market. We discussed its benefits and shortcomings in comparison with typical K-means method. We applied both methods to segmenting the rural tourism market. Unlike K-means method, mixture regression method is a kind of objective oriented method. In this study, we conduct segmentation so as to classify the market into several segments in terms of the level of overall satisfaction. Variables measuring the quality of experience are used as the segmentation bases. The segmentation results of both methods are quite different. The basis variables are not significantly related with overall satisfaction in the segments made by K-means method. However, the variables in the segments made by mixture regression method are significantly related with the overall quality of experience. Since K-means method simply groups the tourists in terms of the similarity of basis variables, the variation of basis variables are not useful in predicting the level of overall satisfaction. K-means method does simply apply the Euclidean distance among variables without considering their associated relationship. However, the mixture regression method classify the market in terms of predictability of overall satisfaction, considering the association among segmentation variables. Thus, the segments done by the mixture regression method are easy to apply marketing strategy related with overall satisfaction. In sum, if there is an objective target variable, the mixture regression method is useful. Otherwise, the simple K-means method is valid for segmentation. However, since the segmentation is an marketing activity preceeding the marketing plan and strategy intended, the mixture regression method would be more appropriate than K-means method in general.
    번역하기

    In this study, we suggest the mixture regression as a new method of segmenting a market. We discussed its benefits and shortcomings in comparison with typical K-means method. We applied both methods to segmenting the rural tourism market. Unlike K-mea...

    In this study, we suggest the mixture regression as a new method of segmenting a market. We discussed its benefits and shortcomings in comparison with typical K-means method. We applied both methods to segmenting the rural tourism market. Unlike K-means method, mixture regression method is a kind of objective oriented method. In this study, we conduct segmentation so as to classify the market into several segments in terms of the level of overall satisfaction. Variables measuring the quality of experience are used as the segmentation bases. The segmentation results of both methods are quite different. The basis variables are not significantly related with overall satisfaction in the segments made by K-means method. However, the variables in the segments made by mixture regression method are significantly related with the overall quality of experience. Since K-means method simply groups the tourists in terms of the similarity of basis variables, the variation of basis variables are not useful in predicting the level of overall satisfaction. K-means method does simply apply the Euclidean distance among variables without considering their associated relationship. However, the mixture regression method classify the market in terms of predictability of overall satisfaction, considering the association among segmentation variables. Thus, the segments done by the mixture regression method are easy to apply marketing strategy related with overall satisfaction. In sum, if there is an objective target variable, the mixture regression method is useful. Otherwise, the simple K-means method is valid for segmentation. However, since the segmentation is an marketing activity preceeding the marketing plan and strategy intended, the mixture regression method would be more appropriate than K-means method in general.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김세범, "해외여행상품의 서비스품질척도의 비교 및 만족ㆍ재구매의도에 관한 연구" 한국마케팅과학회 14 (14): 39-58, 2004

    2 하동현, "테마파크에서의 체험요소에 관한 연구 - Pine과 Gilmore의 체험경제이론(Experience Economy)을 중심으로 -" 한국사진지리학회 19 (19): 37-47, 2009

    3 이현종, "체험관광동기에 따른 관광목적지유형에 관한 연구" 경희대학교 2007

    4 박수경, "체험 요소(4Es)가 체험즐거움, 만족도, 재방문에 미치는 영향: Pine과 Gilmore의 체험경제이론(Experience Economy)을 중심으로" 한국방송광고공사 5 (5): 55-78, 2007

    5 정광현, "처용문화제 방문동기에 따른 시장세분화" 대한관광경영학회 18 (18): 71-87, 2004

    6 윤선진, "자연에서의 체험 활동에 중점을 둔 미적 체험 활동 프로그램 개발연구" 인천교육대학교 2002

    7 박종원, "여성전문병원의 서비스품질과 고객만족에 관한 연구" 경기대학 교 2001

    8 고부언, "서비스품질의 구성요인과 개선방안에 관한 연구 -제주지역 관광서비스를 중심으로" 189-204, 2000

    9 김진수, "문화적 고유성이 관광체험에 미치는 영향" 한양대학교 2002

    10 강기두, "문화예술 공연관람객의 라이프스타일에 관한 탐색적 연구 -뮤지컬공연관람객을 중심으로" 한국경영학회 30 (30): 1143-1167, 2001

    1 김세범, "해외여행상품의 서비스품질척도의 비교 및 만족ㆍ재구매의도에 관한 연구" 한국마케팅과학회 14 (14): 39-58, 2004

    2 하동현, "테마파크에서의 체험요소에 관한 연구 - Pine과 Gilmore의 체험경제이론(Experience Economy)을 중심으로 -" 한국사진지리학회 19 (19): 37-47, 2009

    3 이현종, "체험관광동기에 따른 관광목적지유형에 관한 연구" 경희대학교 2007

    4 박수경, "체험 요소(4Es)가 체험즐거움, 만족도, 재방문에 미치는 영향: Pine과 Gilmore의 체험경제이론(Experience Economy)을 중심으로" 한국방송광고공사 5 (5): 55-78, 2007

    5 정광현, "처용문화제 방문동기에 따른 시장세분화" 대한관광경영학회 18 (18): 71-87, 2004

    6 윤선진, "자연에서의 체험 활동에 중점을 둔 미적 체험 활동 프로그램 개발연구" 인천교육대학교 2002

    7 박종원, "여성전문병원의 서비스품질과 고객만족에 관한 연구" 경기대학 교 2001

    8 고부언, "서비스품질의 구성요인과 개선방안에 관한 연구 -제주지역 관광서비스를 중심으로" 189-204, 2000

    9 김진수, "문화적 고유성이 관광체험에 미치는 영향" 한양대학교 2002

    10 강기두, "문화예술 공연관람객의 라이프스타일에 관한 탐색적 연구 -뮤지컬공연관람객을 중심으로" 한국경영학회 30 (30): 1143-1167, 2001

    11 고호석, "경주 신라문화제 참여동기와 추구편익에 따른시장세분화에 관한 연구" 대한관광경영학회 20 (20): 1-18, 2005

    12 이훈영, "e-마케팅 플러스" 무역경영사 2004

    13 Currim,I.S, "Using Segmentation Approach for Better Prediction and Understanding from Consumer Mode Choice Models" 18 : 301-309, 1981

    14 Prentice,R.C, "Tourism as Experience: The Case of Heritage Parks" 25 (25): 12-14, 1998

    15 Prentice, R. C, "Tourism Motivation and typolpgiesm In A Companion to Tourism" oxford, Pergamon 261-279, 2004

    16 Bello, D.C, "The role of novelty in the pleasure travel experience" 24 (24): 20-26, 1985

    17 Turner,V, "The conter out there: pilgrim's goal" 12 : 191-230, 1973

    18 Calantone, R. J, "The Stability of Benefit Segments" 15 : 395-404, 1978

    19 Pine Ⅱ, B. J, "The Experience Economy : Work is Theatre & Every Business a Stage" HBS Press 1999

    20 Schaninger, C. M, "The Complementary Use of Multivariate Procedures to Investigate Nonlinear and Interactive Relationships Between Personality and Product Usage" 17 : 119-124, 1980

    21 이정란, "TV 드라마 PPL 시청자의 관광동기에 따른 시장세분화 연구ABSTRACT" 한국호텔관광학회 9 (9): 242-252, 2007

    22 Ross, E, "Sightseeing tourists' motivation and satisfaction" 18 (18): 226-237, 1991

    23 Landon,E.L, "Self Concept, Ideal Self Concept, and Consumer Purchase Intentions" 1 : 44-51, 1974

    24 Steenkamp, J. E. B. M, "Segmenting Retail Markets on Store Image Using a Consumer Based Methodology" 67 : 300-320, 1991

    25 Lee, C. K, "Segmentation of Festival Motivation by Nationality and Satisfaction" 25 (25): 61-70, 2004

    26 Masberg, "Psychological nature of leisure and tourism experience" 19 : 399-419, 1996

    27 Greeno, Daniel W, "Personality and Implicit Behavior Patterns" 10 (10): 63-69, 1973

    28 Baumol. W. J, "Performing arts: The economic dilemma" The Twentieth Century Fund 1996

    29 Abramson, Charles, "Parameter Bias from Unobserved Effects in the Multinomial Logit Model of Consumer Choice" 37 (37): 410-26, 2000

    30 Myers, J. G, "On the Study of Consumer Typologies" 107 : 1968

    31 Gupta, Sachin, "On Using Demographic Variables to Determine Segment Membership in Logit Mixture Models" 31 (31): 128-136, 1994

    32 김소영, "Mxiture Model을 이용한 공연관람고객의 시장세분화" 한국광고학회 14 (14): 49-74, 2003

    33 Abramson, "Models of Health Plan Choice" 111 (111): 228-47, 1998

    34 Kamakura, Wagner A, "Modeling Preference and Structural Heterogeneity in Consumer Choice" 15 (15): 152-172, 1996

    35 Fader, Peter S, "Modeling Consumer Choice Among SKUs" 33 (33): 442-452, 1996

    36 Oh, H, Fiore A. M, "Measuring Experience Economy "Concepts: Tourism Applications"" 46 (46): 119-132, 2007

    37 Kamakura, Wagner A, "Measuring Brand Value with Scanner Data" 10 (10): 9-22, 1993

    38 Wedel, M, "Market segmentation : Comceptual and methodological foundation" Kulwer Academic Publisher 2000

    39 Frank, R. E, "Market Segmentation" Prentice Hall 1972

    40 Hruschka,H, "Market Definition and Segmentation Using Fuszzy Clustering Methods" 3 : 117-134, 1986

    41 Andrews, Rick L, "MDS Maps for Product Attributes and Market Response: An Application to Scanner Panel Data" 18 (18): 584-604, 1999

    42 Chintagunta, Pradeep K, "Investigating Heterogeneity in Brand Preferences in Logit Models for Panel Data" 28 (28): 417-528, 1991

    43 Gitelson, R.J, "Insights into the repeat vacation phenomenon" 11 : 199-217, 1984

    44 Andrews, Rick L, "Identifying Segments with Identical Choice Behaviors Across Product Categories: An Intercategory Logit Mixture Model" 19 (19): 65-79, 2002

    45 Moscardo, G. M, "Historic theme parks: an australian experience in authenticity" 13 : 467-479, 1986

    46 Chintagunta,Pradeep K, "Heterogeneous Logit Model Implications for Brand Positioning" 31 (31): 304-311, 1994

    47 Frochot, I, "HISTOQUAL: The Development of Historic House Assessment Scale" 21 (21): 157-167, 2000

    48 Steenkamp, J. E. B. M, "Fuzzy Clusterwise Regression In Benefit Segmentation: Application and Investigation into its Validity" 26 : 237-249, 1993

    49 Montgomery, D. B, "Estimating Dynamic Effects of Marketing Communications Expenditures" 18 : 485-501, 1972

    50 Shyre,S, "Entertainment Marketing & Communication: Selling Branded Performance, People and Place" Pearson Education 2008

    51 Gapinski,J.H, "Economics, demographic and attendance at the symphony" 5 (5): 79-83, 1981

    52 Kiel, G. C, "Dimensions of Consumer Information Seeking Behavior" 9 : 233-239, 1981

    53 Sethi S.P, "Comparative Cluster Anlaysis for World Markets" 8 : 348-354, 1971

    54 Kernan,J.B, "Choice Criteria, Decision Behavior, and Personality" 5 : 155-169, 1968

    55 Anderson, W. T., Jr, "Bank Selection Decisions and Market Segmentation" 40 : 40-45, 1976

    56 Hendon,R.C, "Arts participation: Comparing the elderly and non-elderly" 16 (16): 83-92, 1992

    57 Assael, H, "Approaches to Market Segmentation Analysis" 40 : 67-76, 1976

    58 Andrews, Rick L, "An Empirical Comparison of Logit Choice Models with Discrete Versus Continuous Representations of Heterogeneity" 39 (39): 479-87, 2002

    59 Singh,J, "A Typology of Consumer Dissatisfation Response Style" 66 : 57-99, 1990

    60 Claxton, J. D, "A Taxonomy of Prepurchase Informantion Gathering Patterns" 1 : 35-42, 1974

    61 Bass, F. M, "A Taxonomy of Magazine Readership Applied to Problems in Marketing Strategy and Media Selection" 42 : 337-363, 1969

    62 Jain, Dipak C, "A Random-Coefficients Logit Brand-Choice Model Applied to Panel Data" 12 (12): 317-328, 1994

    63 Kamakura, Wagner A, "A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure" 26 (26): 379-390, 1989

    64 Fomnica, S, "A Market Segmentation of Festival Visitors" 3 (3): 175-182, 1996

    65 Roy, Rishin, "A Framework for Investigating Habits, ‘'The Hand of the Past,’'and Heterogeneity in Dynamic Brand Choice" 15 (15): 280-299, 1996

    66 Moriaty, M, "42" 8 : 82-56, 1978

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Academy of Customer Satisfaction Management KCI등재후보
    2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Academy of Customer Satisfaction Management KCI등재후보
    2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 고객만족경영연구
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.44 1.44 1.71
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.83 2.04 2.198 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼