RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지방세법상 취득세의 취득개념과 과세물건에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Concept of Acquisition and the Taxable Object for Acquisition Tax in the Local Tax Act

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104296085

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Acquisition tax is the one which is imposed on the acquisition of the properties resulted from the typical contract or non-typical one based on the principle of contract liberty. But there have not been enough researches to accurately explain and interpret the stipulations related to the acquisition of the properties in the Local Tax Act. In the practical administrative fields, many opinions have been trying to explain the concept of the acquisition by taking that of Japanese Local Tax Act as an example. But those opinions might be a little confusing approach, because there is a big gap between the Japanese legal framework and the Korean one.
    Accordingly, we have to interpret the stipulations on the definition of acquisition deeply based on the our own legal theory and the judicial precedents accumulated for many decades. As a result, we get to have two different views on the acquisition in Local Tax Act such as the formal acquisition and the substantial acquisition.
    According to formal acquisition view, the acquisition might be defined as the transferring of real estate based on the legal transaction facts as well as legal registration actions on public ledger whereas the acquisition can be defined as the transferring of real estate based on the economic substance such as the payment of purchasing price or the conclusion of parties's negotiation on transferring of real estate. The concept of acquisition is more basic concept on which the taxable object should be based in acquisition tax, so we can draw the concept of acquisition from analyzing the various taxable objects.
    As a whole, we can define the tax target as the presumptive target such as buildings and automobiles on which the tax might be imposed and we can explain the taxable object as the substantial actions or facts which are representing the ability to take tax burden. From the context of the taxable object mentioned above, we can find that the formal acquisition view is the more useful to explain the concept of acquisition than the substantial view because we could find no stipulations on the substantial acquisition concept in Local Tax Act and acquisition tax is a kind of tax that can be imposed on the transferring of real estate where we does not need to take the substantial factors into consideration.
    But to all types of acquisitions, if we pushed the formal acquisition views to be accepted without any exceptions, there might be some irrational results. So we can adopt the some exceptive clauses to give tax exclusions if the legal transferring contract might be cancelled within 2 years from the date of contract conclusion like German legislation example.
    번역하기

    Acquisition tax is the one which is imposed on the acquisition of the properties resulted from the typical contract or non-typical one based on the principle of contract liberty. But there have not been enough researches to accurately explain and in...

    Acquisition tax is the one which is imposed on the acquisition of the properties resulted from the typical contract or non-typical one based on the principle of contract liberty. But there have not been enough researches to accurately explain and interpret the stipulations related to the acquisition of the properties in the Local Tax Act. In the practical administrative fields, many opinions have been trying to explain the concept of the acquisition by taking that of Japanese Local Tax Act as an example. But those opinions might be a little confusing approach, because there is a big gap between the Japanese legal framework and the Korean one.
    Accordingly, we have to interpret the stipulations on the definition of acquisition deeply based on the our own legal theory and the judicial precedents accumulated for many decades. As a result, we get to have two different views on the acquisition in Local Tax Act such as the formal acquisition and the substantial acquisition.
    According to formal acquisition view, the acquisition might be defined as the transferring of real estate based on the legal transaction facts as well as legal registration actions on public ledger whereas the acquisition can be defined as the transferring of real estate based on the economic substance such as the payment of purchasing price or the conclusion of parties's negotiation on transferring of real estate. The concept of acquisition is more basic concept on which the taxable object should be based in acquisition tax, so we can draw the concept of acquisition from analyzing the various taxable objects.
    As a whole, we can define the tax target as the presumptive target such as buildings and automobiles on which the tax might be imposed and we can explain the taxable object as the substantial actions or facts which are representing the ability to take tax burden. From the context of the taxable object mentioned above, we can find that the formal acquisition view is the more useful to explain the concept of acquisition than the substantial view because we could find no stipulations on the substantial acquisition concept in Local Tax Act and acquisition tax is a kind of tax that can be imposed on the transferring of real estate where we does not need to take the substantial factors into consideration.
    But to all types of acquisitions, if we pushed the formal acquisition views to be accepted without any exceptions, there might be some irrational results. So we can adopt the some exceptive clauses to give tax exclusions if the legal transferring contract might be cancelled within 2 years from the date of contract conclusion like German legislation example.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 ?野雅憲, "不動産取得稅の今日的意義と問題點" 實務行政法硏究會 (85) : 1989

    2 이동식, "헌법적 관점에서 바라본 부동산 세제" 세경사 (1) : 2006

    3 정지선, "취득세의 합리적 개선방안에 관한 연구-입법론을 중심으로-" 서울시립대학교 세무대학원 2006

    4 임재억, "취득세에서의 취득과 취득시기에 대한 연구-부동산 거래를 중심으로-" 서울대학교 대학원 2005

    5 최원, "취득세에 있어서의 취득개념에 관한 연구" 경희대학교 국제법무대학원 2000

    6 곽윤직, "채권총론" 박영사 1994

    7 이은영, "채권각론" 박영사 2005

    8 안경봉, "직장주택조합명의로 한 아파트 신축과 취득세 부과" 조세통람사 (10) : 1994

    9 행정자치부, "지방세정연감" 행정자치부 2007

    10 김홍균, "지방세법상 취득세에 관한 연구" 영남대학교 대학원 1998

    1 ?野雅憲, "不動産取得稅の今日的意義と問題點" 實務行政法硏究會 (85) : 1989

    2 이동식, "헌법적 관점에서 바라본 부동산 세제" 세경사 (1) : 2006

    3 정지선, "취득세의 합리적 개선방안에 관한 연구-입법론을 중심으로-" 서울시립대학교 세무대학원 2006

    4 임재억, "취득세에서의 취득과 취득시기에 대한 연구-부동산 거래를 중심으로-" 서울대학교 대학원 2005

    5 최원, "취득세에 있어서의 취득개념에 관한 연구" 경희대학교 국제법무대학원 2000

    6 곽윤직, "채권총론" 박영사 1994

    7 이은영, "채권각론" 박영사 2005

    8 안경봉, "직장주택조합명의로 한 아파트 신축과 취득세 부과" 조세통람사 (10) : 1994

    9 행정자치부, "지방세정연감" 행정자치부 2007

    10 김홍균, "지방세법상 취득세에 관한 연구" 영남대학교 대학원 1998

    11 임재근, "지방세 과세법리에 관한 연구" 서울시립대학교 세무대학원 2006

    12 임승순, "조세법" 박영사 2005

    13 차병권, "조세개론" 박영사 1984

    14 우명동, "재정학" 도서출판 해남 2007

    15 김완석, "양도담보의 조세법상의 논점" 중앙법학회 5 (5): 2003

    16 최명근, "세법학총론" 세경사 2005

    17 김두천, "세법학" 박영사 1982

    18 이동식, "생활의 필수 재화로서의 부동산에 대한 세제적 접근 필요성" 사단법인 한국세무학회 2008

    19 유일언, "부동산매매계약의 합의해제에 따른 취득세 과세에 대한 고찰" 충남대학교 14 (14): 2003

    20 김형배, "민법학강의" 新潮社 2003

    21 김건일, "계약의 해제가 조세채권에 미치는 영향" 법문사 5 : 1997

    22 下忖 宏, "財政讀本" 日本評論社 1926

    23 堀江歸一, "財政學綱要" 寶文館 1927

    24 大內兵衡, "財政學大綱 中卷 租稅論" 岩波書店 1930

    25 神戶正雄, "財政學大系" 弘文堂書房 1929

    26 송쌍종, "財政學(租稅論<理>)" 한국조세협회출판부 1976

    27 汐見三浪, "財政學" 朝日新聞社 1941

    28 神戶正雄, "財政學" 日本評論社 1936

    29 石島 弘, "課稅權と課稅物件の硏究(租稅法硏究 弟1券)" 株式會社 信山社 2003

    30 小川鄕太郞, "稅制整理論" 內外出判株式會社 1923

    31 勝 正憲, "稅の話" 千倉書房 1929

    32 藤曲武美, "稅の基礎" 經濟法令硏究會 2007

    33 高木勝一, "租稅論" 八千代出版株式會社 2004

    34 송쌍종, "租稅法論" 법문사 1993

    35 金子宏, "租稅法規の 解釋" 判例時報刊行會 (395) : 1965

    36 金子宏, "租稅法 弟10板" 弘文堂 2005

    37 장재식, "租稅法" 서울대학교출판부 1990

    38 野田澤軍治, "現代財政論" 東山堂書房 1942

    39 北野弘久, "現代稅法講義" 法律文化社 1991

    40 星野直樹, "日本租稅法槪論" 日本評論社 1931

    41 北琦 進, "新財政學要義" 嚴松堂書店 1930

    42 山田二郞, "實務 租稅法講義" 民事法硏究會 2005

    43 財團法人 東京稅務協會, "地方稅ガイドブック" 1997

    44 逸見 幸司, "圖解 地方稅" 大藏財務協會 2005

    45 中川一郞, "判例評釋" 三晃社 (30) : 1965

    46 "http://www.courts.go.jp"

    47 Tipke, "Steuerrecht 18" Auflage 2005

    48 "Grunderwerbsteuergesetz(GrEStG)"

    49 Prof.Dr.Klaus Tipke, "DIE STEUERRECHTSORDNUNG" Verlag Dr.Otto Schmidt 2003

    50 公民敎育硏究會, "(文檢參考)公民科大講座. 第10卷" 中文館 1933

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.98 0.98 1.03
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.37 1.48 1.713 0.03
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼