This study explores the rise of pop-up stores in South Korea from 2009 as a unique form of temporary architecture that responds to and reshapes the urban environment. Although initially conceived as a marketing tool, Korean pop-up stores have evolved ...
This study explores the rise of pop-up stores in South Korea from 2009 as a unique form of temporary architecture that responds to and reshapes the urban environment. Although initially conceived as a marketing tool, Korean pop-up stores have evolved into complex spatial practices, deeply intertwined with digital media, fast-moving consumer culture, and urban leisure. From the perspective of the pavilion, these stores are temporary, image-driven spaces that align with postmodern themes, such as immediacy, image, spectacle, and commodified experience. This study examines the environmental implications of temporary architecture, particularly the material waste and sustainability challenges associated with short-lived structures. It also investigates whether pop-up stores offer new insights into environmentally conscious design and the evolving responsibilities of architecture despite their impermanence.
Despite Korea’s status as a highly digitalized society, there has been little research on how platform-based consumption reconfigures urban space. This study therefore approaches pop-up stores, platforms, and the city as an integrated system and applies the concept of platformativity to the urban context. Through an analysis of representative Korean pop-up stores from their origins to the present, the study identifies the shifting trajectory of major commercial zones while revealing the image-driven, mutable urban landscapes that pop-up stores generate and the gentrification accelerated by their rapid cycles. This study offers one of the first interpretations of the fifteen-year evolution of Korean pop-up stores at the scale of the city.
The analysis is based on three case studies. First, Dior Seongsu in Seoul represents the luxurious turn in pop-up culture and the paradox of temporary architecture becoming permanent. Second, BookTok and Mollaetang in Busan exemplify the use of pop-ups in urban regeneration efforts, activating declining neighborhoods through cultural programming and spatial experimentation. The third case examines Kolon’s sustainability-driven pop-ups in collaboration with Schemata Architects, where temporary structures are reimagined through the lens of brand activism and hedonistic sustainability. This study highlights the operation of pop-up architecture as a visual and conceptual phenomenon using formal analysis as a key methodological tool. Ultimately, the Korean pop-up store is positioned as an architectural type that negotiates temporality, identity, and environmental consciousness within today’s urban landscape.