서울시 주거환경개선사업 정책의 실효성에 관한 연구 = 수혜자와 공급자의 인식비교

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The objective of this study is to compare and verify perceptions of suppliers and beneficiaries in the aspect of policy/system, business/economy and social economy, focusing on residential environment improvement projects in Mapo-gu and Gwangjin-gu of Seoul. By extracting variables to evaluate effectiveness from the precedent studies and cases of analyzing the effect of residential environment improvement projects and then classifying them into the aspect of policy/system, business/economy and social economy on the basis of analysis frame, we asked experts and the persons concerned about the extracted/classified variables and then conducted comparison analysis of perceptions on them.
In order to verify the research questions of this study, we calculated the average scores of the perception of the supplier and beneficiary groups for each subordinate variable. Also t-test was conducted to examine the differences of perception between two groups. In the results, first, the average scores of the beneficiary group and supplier group were 3.40 and 4.00 respectively for the questions about policy goals in the aspect of policy/system, which was analyzed that both groups perceived them positively. And there were differences of perception between both groups. Since the average scores of the beneficiary group and supplier group were 3.65 and 4.17 respectively for the questions about taking actions against problems, it was analyzed that both groups perceived them positively. And it was shown that there were differences of perception between both groups. As the average scores of the beneficiary group and supplier group were 3.65 and 3.97 respectively for the questions about perception of housing policies, it was analyzed that both groups perceived them positively. And there were no differences of perception between two groups. Second, the average scores of the beneficiary group and supplier group were 3.70 and 3.95 for the questions about individual economic effect in the aspect of business/economy, which was analyzed that both groups perceived them positively. And there were no differences of perception between two groups. Since the average scores of the beneficiary group and supplier group were 3.45 and 3.83 for the questions about social economic effect, it was analyzed that both groups perceived them positively. And it was shown that there were differences of perception between two groups. Third, both groups generally showed low perception on the degree of individual residential environment improvement in the aspect of social environment. The results of t-test conducted to examine the differences of perception between two groups found low average scores of the supplier group while there were no statistically significant differences. The perception of both groups on the degree of social residential environment improvement was mostly very low while the supplier group showed a little less differences than the beneficiary group. The results of t-test conducted to examine differences of perception between two groups found low average scores of the supplier group and also showed statistically significant differences.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. 서론
• 2. 연구설계
• 3. 분석 결과
• 4. 결론 및 시사점
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 임상봉, "포괄보조금제도의 시행에 따른 농어촌지역 종합개발평가기법 개발" 한국농어촌공사, 농림수산식품부 2009

2 하성규, "지속가능한 도시론" 보성각 2003

3 정창수, "주택정책의 정책효과 분석에 관한 연구 : 최근 3년간 서울지역 아파트가격을 중심으로" 경희대학교 대학원 2004

4 이진경, "주택정책의 유형별 효과성 분석 : 목표달성도와 주택가격영향을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2004

5 윤봉옥, "주거환경개선사업의 발전방안에 관한 연구 : 목포시 원도심을 중심으로" 목포대학교 대학원 2012

6 임재득, "주거환경개선 사업의 만족도 및 재정착률 제고 방안 : 대전광역시 사례를 중심으로" 목원대학교 산업정보대학원 2009

7 정정길, "정책학원론" 대명출판사 2007

8 김재형, "예비타당성 조사수행을 위한 일반지침: 공공건설사업의 예비타당성조사" 대한토목학회 239 : 2003

9 경실련 도시개혁센터, "도시계획의 새로운 패러다임" 보성각 2001

10 김경량, "농촌마을종합개발사업의 효율적 추진을 위한 중간평가체계 개발" 한국농촌계획학회 12 (12): 65-73, 2006

11 박경채, "거점확산형 주거환경개선사업에 대한 주민의식조사를 통한 개선방안 : 양림동을 중심으로" 광주대학교 대학원 2011

12 이창호, "거점확산형 주거환경개선 시범사업을 위한 운영방안" 주택도시연구원 2008