RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      舊韓末의 官營汽船海運에 關한 硏究 = A Study of Marine Transportation by Official Steamships in the Last Years of the Yi-Dynasty

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2074192

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The study of Maritime Transportation by Official Steamships in the Last years of the Yi-Dynasty.
      The opening of ports in 1876 brought an end to the long period of her seclusionism and put her under the influence of Western capitalism by procuring steamships and developing the enterprise of maritime transportation.
      The maritime transportation in this period can be classified as follows. Maritime transportation
      (1) by domestic capital
      (a) by governmental investment
      (b) by civilian investment
      (2) by foreign capital
      (a) by capital of the foreigners settled in Korea
      (b) by large maritime entrepreneurs in foreign countries
      This dissertation is a study of the maritime transportation by governmental investment at the beginning of maritime enterprise in Korean history, and the author tries to investigate the essential characters of maritime transportation of the Korean government by clarifying eh managements, the governmental organs in charge of maritime transportation, as well as their inner phases
      The managements of governmental maritime transportation in those years and the period of their enterprise are as follows.
      (1) Tongri Kyowup Yongsang Samu Amun(統理交涉通商事務衙門)‥‥(1883-1886)
      (2) Junun-kuk(Transportation Burear)‥‥‥(1886-1892)
      (3) Yiun-sa(Name of Maritime Transportation Company)‥‥‥(1892-1895)
      (4) Management consigned to foreign companies(1895-1901)
      The essential characteristics of maritime transportation by stea mships can be understood from three facets of change of the man agements their basic characters and inner phases of management.
      (A) Change of managements
      All the change of the managements as well as the beginning of maritime transportation by steamships resulted from the political influence of the struggling among the foreign forces such as China, Japan and Russia. Maritime transportation by steamships was reg arded as an objective of political dealings very often in the process of change of managements.
      (1) Outgrowth
      The maritime transportation by steamships was brought in by Paul Georg von Moellendorff, who was sent by China to Korea for the purpose of hindering the Japanese power in Korea, and he adhered faithfully to the Chinese policy in the management of maritime transportation in Korea.
      (2) Tongri Kyosup Tongsang Samu Amun
      Moellendorff, who wanted to organize the maritime transportation in Korea as one of the policies of China toward Korea, induced the Jardine, Matheson & Co. of England, John Middleton & Co. of U.S. A.,E. Meyer & Co. of Germany and China Merchant Steamship Navigation Company of China, to check the invasion of Japanese maritime transportation, for the management of the maritime transportation of this organization.
      (3) Junun-kuk
      Junun-kuk, which could not perform its function during the period when Moellendorff administered the maritime transportation in Korea according to his policy, stepped forward in the management of maritime transportation after Moellendorff had been discharged and left Korea owing to the Change of political situation, and it joined hands with the Japanes maritime transportation in direct opposition to the Tongri Kyosup Tongsang Samu Amun.
      (4) Yiun-sa
      China. fearing that Junun-kuk worked hand in hand with the maritime transportation of Japan that was becoming more and more powerful in Karea, tried to curry favor with Korea by offering loans with favorable conditions for purchasing steamships and this resulted from the Chinese policy to recover her lordship over Korea.
      (5) Consigning of Yiun-sa to N.Y.K.
      When Japanese power expelled that of China out of Korea, Yiun-sa, which had been founded for the purpose of carrying out the Chinese policy toward Korea, was taken over by Japan under the disguise of consigned management.
      (6) Consigning of Official Steamships to E. Meyer & Co.
      When the Japanese influence was weakened with the appearance of Russians on the scene, the managerial right of Yiun-sa that had been taken up by Japan, was forced to be returned back to Korea, and the management of maritime transportation by official steamships was consigned to E. Meyer & Co., the company of Germany in Korea, the interest of which country was parallel with that of Russia.
      The maritime transportation, which had been brought in by the Chinese, with political intention to hinder the invasion of Japan, perished as a result of the political dealings of Japanese intrigues.
      (B) Basic characters
      Even if the managements of the maritime transportation by official steamships were changed many times, the basic character of returing back to the traditional transporting of tribute(tax in rice), being a long established custom, did not change.
      (1) Tongri Kyosup Tongsang Samu Amun
      Mollendoff, who was in charge of maritime transportation by steamships of this organization, tried to disorganize the self-supporting and self-sufficient system of Korea with the introduction of maritime transportation into Korea, recognizing the effects of maritime transportation in the modernization of Korea, and he tried to prompt merchandising of the agricultural products and to link the economy of Korea with that of the Western Europe. But in the meantime, these efforts of improvement ended in vain, and eventually, maritime transportation teturned back to the traditional form of transporting tribute(tax in rice).
      (2) Junun-kuk
      This office, regardless of their variegated effects, limited the maritime transportation by steamships to the transporting of tribute(tax in rice) only. It looked forward to the ease and safety of navigation of steamships, which invited a greater degree of reliance upon this conventional transportation by sea because it strengthened the system of collecting tribute(tax in rice).
      (3) Yiun-sa
      Although Yiun-sa was in possession of mechanized means of production, steamships and a form of enterprise and tried to carry out "Transportation for others" by steamships, it lacked economic foundation. Consequently, it had to depend upon the monopoly of transportation of tribute(tax in rice).
      (4) After restoration of managerial right of Yiun-sa
      It was after the repeal of the rice tax system that Yiun-sa was returned back to the Korean government from N.Y.K. The Korean government, that had been enthusiastic about the introduction of steamships with the largest loan for a single project, hesitated in management of the steamships after the reform of tax system, and finally gave it up.
      (C) Inner phases of management
      Economic activities by officials are always apt to give rise to many defects. It goes without saying that maritime transportation administered by the then officials who hardly understood the Western efficiency and rationality was ineffective.
      (1) Tongri Kyosup Tongsang Samu Amun
      This organization tried to utilize the foreign steamships by inducing them into Korean waters with conditions of compensation for deficit, but what with preferential political objective of hindering the invasion of the Japanese maritime transportation and what with unfamiliarity with capitalistic dealings of commerce, it was obliged to accept the unfavorable conditions and was subject to ineffective management. And consequently, maritime transportation by steamships was transformed into the means of acquiring rights for advanced capitalistic nations over this underdeveloped country, becoming the first example of a sacrifice resulting from political dealings.
      (2) Junun-kuk
      This office performed its maritime transportation with foreign steamships chartered and its own steamships procured with foreign loans, but the problem of selecting suitable steamships was evident from the beginning. Therefore, the intention for effective management by eliminating uneconomical operating of sole purpose ships, and for a synthetic policy of organic conjunction with other effective administrative policies besides transportation of sole goods of tribute(tax in rice) by steamships that were mechanized means of production, operating as a kind of sole purpose ship, and for the overcoming of the difficulty that the character of seasonal cargo of tribute(tax in rice) brought, is hardly to be observed.
      (3) Yiun-sa
      This was modernized in its system of enterprise and means of production, but could not be free from the category of trite management by the officials in its production methods.

      번역하기

      The study of Maritime Transportation by Official Steamships in the Last years of the Yi-Dynasty. The opening of ports in 1876 brought an end to the long period of her seclusionism and put her under the influence of Western capitalism by procuring st...

      The study of Maritime Transportation by Official Steamships in the Last years of the Yi-Dynasty.
      The opening of ports in 1876 brought an end to the long period of her seclusionism and put her under the influence of Western capitalism by procuring steamships and developing the enterprise of maritime transportation.
      The maritime transportation in this period can be classified as follows. Maritime transportation
      (1) by domestic capital
      (a) by governmental investment
      (b) by civilian investment
      (2) by foreign capital
      (a) by capital of the foreigners settled in Korea
      (b) by large maritime entrepreneurs in foreign countries
      This dissertation is a study of the maritime transportation by governmental investment at the beginning of maritime enterprise in Korean history, and the author tries to investigate the essential characters of maritime transportation of the Korean government by clarifying eh managements, the governmental organs in charge of maritime transportation, as well as their inner phases
      The managements of governmental maritime transportation in those years and the period of their enterprise are as follows.
      (1) Tongri Kyowup Yongsang Samu Amun(統理交涉通商事務衙門)‥‥(1883-1886)
      (2) Junun-kuk(Transportation Burear)‥‥‥(1886-1892)
      (3) Yiun-sa(Name of Maritime Transportation Company)‥‥‥(1892-1895)
      (4) Management consigned to foreign companies(1895-1901)
      The essential characteristics of maritime transportation by stea mships can be understood from three facets of change of the man agements their basic characters and inner phases of management.
      (A) Change of managements
      All the change of the managements as well as the beginning of maritime transportation by steamships resulted from the political influence of the struggling among the foreign forces such as China, Japan and Russia. Maritime transportation by steamships was reg arded as an objective of political dealings very often in the process of change of managements.
      (1) Outgrowth
      The maritime transportation by steamships was brought in by Paul Georg von Moellendorff, who was sent by China to Korea for the purpose of hindering the Japanese power in Korea, and he adhered faithfully to the Chinese policy in the management of maritime transportation in Korea.
      (2) Tongri Kyosup Tongsang Samu Amun
      Moellendorff, who wanted to organize the maritime transportation in Korea as one of the policies of China toward Korea, induced the Jardine, Matheson & Co. of England, John Middleton & Co. of U.S. A.,E. Meyer & Co. of Germany and China Merchant Steamship Navigation Company of China, to check the invasion of Japanese maritime transportation, for the management of the maritime transportation of this organization.
      (3) Junun-kuk
      Junun-kuk, which could not perform its function during the period when Moellendorff administered the maritime transportation in Korea according to his policy, stepped forward in the management of maritime transportation after Moellendorff had been discharged and left Korea owing to the Change of political situation, and it joined hands with the Japanes maritime transportation in direct opposition to the Tongri Kyosup Tongsang Samu Amun.
      (4) Yiun-sa
      China. fearing that Junun-kuk worked hand in hand with the maritime transportation of Japan that was becoming more and more powerful in Karea, tried to curry favor with Korea by offering loans with favorable conditions for purchasing steamships and this resulted from the Chinese policy to recover her lordship over Korea.
      (5) Consigning of Yiun-sa to N.Y.K.
      When Japanese power expelled that of China out of Korea, Yiun-sa, which had been founded for the purpose of carrying out the Chinese policy toward Korea, was taken over by Japan under the disguise of consigned management.
      (6) Consigning of Official Steamships to E. Meyer & Co.
      When the Japanese influence was weakened with the appearance of Russians on the scene, the managerial right of Yiun-sa that had been taken up by Japan, was forced to be returned back to Korea, and the management of maritime transportation by official steamships was consigned to E. Meyer & Co., the company of Germany in Korea, the interest of which country was parallel with that of Russia.
      The maritime transportation, which had been brought in by the Chinese, with political intention to hinder the invasion of Japan, perished as a result of the political dealings of Japanese intrigues.
      (B) Basic characters
      Even if the managements of the maritime transportation by official steamships were changed many times, the basic character of returing back to the traditional transporting of tribute(tax in rice), being a long established custom, did not change.
      (1) Tongri Kyosup Tongsang Samu Amun
      Mollendoff, who was in charge of maritime transportation by steamships of this organization, tried to disorganize the self-supporting and self-sufficient system of Korea with the introduction of maritime transportation into Korea, recognizing the effects of maritime transportation in the modernization of Korea, and he tried to prompt merchandising of the agricultural products and to link the economy of Korea with that of the Western Europe. But in the meantime, these efforts of improvement ended in vain, and eventually, maritime transportation teturned back to the traditional form of transporting tribute(tax in rice).
      (2) Junun-kuk
      This office, regardless of their variegated effects, limited the maritime transportation by steamships to the transporting of tribute(tax in rice) only. It looked forward to the ease and safety of navigation of steamships, which invited a greater degree of reliance upon this conventional transportation by sea because it strengthened the system of collecting tribute(tax in rice).
      (3) Yiun-sa
      Although Yiun-sa was in possession of mechanized means of production, steamships and a form of enterprise and tried to carry out "Transportation for others" by steamships, it lacked economic foundation. Consequently, it had to depend upon the monopoly of transportation of tribute(tax in rice).
      (4) After restoration of managerial right of Yiun-sa
      It was after the repeal of the rice tax system that Yiun-sa was returned back to the Korean government from N.Y.K. The Korean government, that had been enthusiastic about the introduction of steamships with the largest loan for a single project, hesitated in management of the steamships after the reform of tax system, and finally gave it up.
      (C) Inner phases of management
      Economic activities by officials are always apt to give rise to many defects. It goes without saying that maritime transportation administered by the then officials who hardly understood the Western efficiency and rationality was ineffective.
      (1) Tongri Kyosup Tongsang Samu Amun
      This organization tried to utilize the foreign steamships by inducing them into Korean waters with conditions of compensation for deficit, but what with preferential political objective of hindering the invasion of the Japanese maritime transportation and what with unfamiliarity with capitalistic dealings of commerce, it was obliged to accept the unfavorable conditions and was subject to ineffective management. And consequently, maritime transportation by steamships was transformed into the means of acquiring rights for advanced capitalistic nations over this underdeveloped country, becoming the first example of a sacrifice resulting from political dealings.
      (2) Junun-kuk
      This office performed its maritime transportation with foreign steamships chartered and its own steamships procured with foreign loans, but the problem of selecting suitable steamships was evident from the beginning. Therefore, the intention for effective management by eliminating uneconomical operating of sole purpose ships, and for a synthetic policy of organic conjunction with other effective administrative policies besides transportation of sole goods of tribute(tax in rice) by steamships that were mechanized means of production, operating as a kind of sole purpose ship, and for the overcoming of the difficulty that the character of seasonal cargo of tribute(tax in rice) brought, is hardly to be observed.
      (3) Yiun-sa
      This was modernized in its system of enterprise and means of production, but could not be free from the category of trite management by the officials in its production methods.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 序 說
      • 第一章 統理交涉通商事務衙門의 汽船海運(1883年∼1886年)
      • 序 言
      • 第一節 恰和洋行의 韓國水域에의 汽船配船(1883年∼1884年)
      • (一) 恰和洋行의 韓國水域에의 汽船配船에 關한 約定書內容의 要約
      • 序 說
      • 第一章 統理交涉通商事務衙門의 汽船海運(1883年∼1886年)
      • 序 言
      • 第一節 恰和洋行의 韓國水域에의 汽船配船(1883年∼1884年)
      • (一) 恰和洋行의 韓國水域에의 汽船配船에 關한 約定書內容의 要約
      • (二) 南陞號의 運航
      • 第二節 招商國의 韓國水域에의 汽船配船(1883年~1884年)
      • (一) 輪船往來上海朝鮮公道合約章程
      • (1) 招商國의 義務와 權利
      • (2) 韓國政府의 義務와 權利
      • (3) 契約期限
      • (二)「輪船往來上海 朝鮮公道合約章程」의 特性
      • (1) 現存 韓國最初의 汽船利用에 關한 合約書
      • (2) 淸國의 對韓政策의 所産
      • (3) 海關稅收金과 海1運과의 關聯性
      • (4) 現存韓國最初의 汽船航海計算書
      • (三) 續約의 訂定
      • 第三節 Middleton(密得頓)汽船會社(1884年)
      • (一) 汽船會社設立合約書
      • (二) Middleton 汽船會社의 性格
      • (三) 合約書에 있어서의 問題点
      • (1) 英文과 漢文과의 內容 差異
      • (2) 利益分配에 있어서의 問題點
      • (3) 海運發展契機造成의 可能性
      • 第四節 世昌洋行의 希化船運航(1885年)
      • (一) 傭船依賴覺書와 그 性格
      • (二) 希化船의 運航
      • (三) 希化船運航의 對內外反應 및 그 結果
      • (1) 對內的 反應
      • (2) 對外的 反應
      • (3) 結果
      • 第五節 世昌洋行이 希化船自雇運航(1886年)
      • (一) 2萬磅 借款과 링크된 3萬石 載貨量을 保障한 約定書의 發給
      • (二) 韓國政府의 被害
      • (三) 漕轉弊習의 露呈
      • 結 言
      • 第二章 轉運局의 汽船海運(1886年~1892年)
      • 序 言
      • 第一節 汽船의 導入
      • (一) 外國借款에 依한 船舶導入
      • (二) 汽船導入의 嚆矢
      • (三) 商船(汽船)의 購買
      • (1) 海龍號
      • (2) 朝陽號
      • (3) 廣濟(蒼龍)號
      • 第二節 官船의 直營
      • (一) 官船의 用途
      • (1) 海龍號의 運航
      • (2) 廣濟.朝陽 兩號의 運航
      • (3) 蒼龍號의 運航
      • (4) 船舶修理
      • (二) 船 員
      • (1) 船員의 質
      • (2) 船員의 待遇
      • (三) 官權의 濫用
      • (四) 違法行爲의 恣行
      • (五) 消極的인 海運經營
      • 第三節 外國船의 傭船
      • (一) 日本船의 傭船
      • (二) 獨逸船의 傭船
      • (三) 瑙威國船의 傭船
      • 第四節 傭船契約書
      • (一) 定期傭船契約書
      • (二) 外國人에게 傭船해 준 航海傭船契約書
      • (三) 外國人으로부터 傭船한 航海傭船契約書
      • 結 言
      • 第三章 利運社(1893年~1895年)
      • 序 言
      • 第一節 利運社의 設立
      • (一) 利運社 誕生의 經緯
      • (二) 利運社 設立의 準備
      • (1) 轉運局의 借款
      • (2) 轉運局借款의 用途
      • (三)「汽船會社章程」과 利運社
      • (1)「汽船會社章程」및 그 要約
      • (2)「汽船會社 章程」과 利運社의 設立
      • ①「汽船會社章程」의 解釋上의 實體
      • ②「汽船會社章程」과「汽船會社」의 實體
      • ③ 利運社의 設立年度
      • 第二節 利運社의 經營
      • (一) 船隊의 編成
      • (1) 政府所有船의 引受
      • (2) 船舶의 購買
      • ① 獨逸汽船 潮州府號의 購買
      • ② 日本船의 購買
      • ③ 淸國船의 購買
      • (二) 經 營
      • (1) 運米航路
      • (2) 運米 以外의 航路
      • (3) 官企業으로서의 幣端
      • ① 官吏에 依한 經營
      • ② 日本人의 雇傭
      • ③ 經營의 不實性
      • 第三節 利運社의 閉鎖
      • 結 言
      • 第四章 外國會社에의 委託經營(1895年~1901年)
      • 序 言
      • 第一節 利運社의 日本郵船株式會社에의 委託契約
      • (一) 本契約
      • (二) 附帶契約
      • (三) 契約에 있어서의 問題點
      • 第二節 日本郵船株式會社 仁川支店의 利運社 經營
      • (一) 航路經營과 成果
      • (二) 破 約
      • 第三節 日本郵船株式會社와 破約한 後의 措置
      • 結 言
      • 結 論
      • 英 文 抄
      • 參考文獻
      • 附錄(年表)
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼