RISS 검색 - 국내학술지논문

다국어 입력

あぁかがさざただなはばぱまやゃらわゎんいぃきぎしじちぢにひびぴみりうぅくぐすずつづっぬふぶぷむゆゅるえぇけげせぜてでねへべぺめれおぉこごそぞとどのほぼぽもよょろを

アァカサザタダナハバパマヤャラワヮンイィキギシジチヂニヒビピミリウゥクグスズツヅッヌフブプムユュルエェケゲセゼテデヘベペメレオォコゴソゾトドノホボポモヨョロヲ ―

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)

中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.

ㅥ ㅦ ㅧ ㅨ ㅩ ㅪ ㅫ ㅬ ㅭ ㅮ ㅯ ㅰ ㅱ ㅲ ㅳ ㅴ ㅵ ㅶ ㅷ ㅸ ㅹ ㅺ ㅻ ㅼ ㅽ ㅾ ㅿ ㆀ ㆁ ㆂ ㆃ ㆄ ㆅ ㆆ ㆇ ㆈ ㆉ ㆊ ㆋ ㆌ ㆍ ㆎ

Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ ν ξ ο π ρ σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω

á à Á À é è É È ç Ç ê

Ä Ö Ü ä ö ü ß

ְ ֳ ֲ ֱ ָ ַ ֵ ֶ ִ ֹ ּ ֻ ׂ ׁ ּ פ ם ן ו ט א ר ק ף ך ל ח י ע כ ג ד ש ץ ת צ מ נ ה ב

‘ ’ “ ” 〔〕〈〉「」『』【】＂（）［］｛｝

± × ÷ ≠ ≤ ≥ ∞ ∴ ♂ ♀ ∠ ⊥ ⌒ ∂ ∇ ≡ ≒ ≪ ≫ √ ∽ ∝ ∵ ∫ ∬ ∈ ∋ ⊆ ⊇ ⊂ ⊃ ∪ ∩ ∧ ∨ ￢ ⇒ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∮ ∑ ∏ ＋－＜＝＞

、。 · ‥ … ¨ 〃 ― ∥ ＼ ∼ ´ ～ ˇ ˘ ˝ ˚ ˙ ¸ ˛ ¡ ¿ ː ！＇，．／：；？＾＿｀｜

½ ⅓ ⅔ ¼ ¾ ⅛ ⅜ ⅝ ⅞ ¹ ² ³ ⁴ ⁿ ₁ ₂ ₃ ₄

Æ Ð Ħ Ĳ Ł Ø Œ Þ Ŧ Ŋ æ đ ð ħ ı ĳ ĸ ŀ ł ø œ ß þ ŧ ŋ ŉ

А Б В Г Д Е Ё Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я а б в г д е ё ж з и й к л м н о п р с т у ф х ц ч ш щ ъ ы ь э ю я

′ ″ ℃ Å ￠￡￥ ¤ ℉ ‰ ＄％Ｆ￦㎕㎖㎗ ℓ ㎘㏄㎣㎤㎥㎦㎙㎚㎛㎜㎝㎞㎟㎠㎡㎢㏊㎍㎎㎏㏏㎈㎉㏈㎧㎨㎰㎱㎲㎳㎴㎵㎶㎷㎸㎹㎀㎁㎂㎃㎄㎺㎻㎽㎾㎿㎐㎑㎒㎓㎔ Ω ㏀㏁㎊㎋㎌㏖㏅㎭㎮㎯㏛㎩㎪㎫㎬㏝㏐㏓㏃㏉㏜㏆

§ ※ ☆ ★ ○ ● ◎ ◇ ◆ □ ■ △ ▽ → ← ↑ ↓ ↔ 〓 ◁ ◀ ▷ ▶ ♤ ♠ ♡ ♥ ♧ ♣ ⊙ ◈ ▣ ◐ ◑ ▒ ▤ ▥ ▨ ▧ ▦ ▩ ♨ ☏ ☎ ☜ ☞ ¶ † ‡ ↕ ↗ ↙ ↖ ↘ ♭ ♩ ♪ ♬ ㉿㈜ № ㏇ ™ ㏂㏘ ℡ ＃＆＊＠ ª º

ⅰ ⅱ ⅲ ⅳ ⅴ ⅵ ⅶ ⅷ ⅸ ⅹ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ

ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک ل م ن ه و ی

닫기

최근 검색 목록
전체삭제 닫기

RISS 인기검색어

무료
기관 내 무료
유료

내보내기
내책장담기
한글로보기

정확도순

내림차순

내림차순

10개씩 출력

1
Regenerative capacity of augmented bone in rat calvarial guided bone augmentation model

Kubota, Tatsuya,Hasuike, Akira,Ozawa, Yasumasa,Yamamoto, Takanobu,Tsunori, Katsuyoshi,Yamada, Yutaka,Sato, Shuichi Korean Academy of Periodontology 2017 Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science Vol.47 No.2
- 원문보기
Purpose: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is the most widely used technique to regenerate and augment bones. Even though augmented bones (ABs) have been examined histologically in many studies, few studies have been conducted to examine the biological potential of these bones and the healing dynamics following their use. Moreover, whether the bone obtained from the GBR procedure possesses the same functions as the existing autogenous bone is uncertain. In particular, little attention has been paid to the regenerative ability of GBR bone. Therefore, the present study histologically evaluated the regenerative capacity of AB in the occlusive space of a rat guided bone augmentation (GBA) model. Methods: The calvaria of 30 rats were exposed, and plastic caps were placed on the right of the calvaria in 10 of the 30 rats. After a 12-week healing phase, critical-sized calvarial bone defects (diameter: 5.0 mm) were trephined into the dorsal parietal bone on the left of the calvaria. Bone particles were harvested from the AB or the cortical bone (CB) using a bone scraper and transplanted into the critical defects. Results: The newly generated bone at the defects' edge was evaluated using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and histological sections. In the micro-CT analysis, the radiopacity in both the augmented and the CB groups remained high throughout the observational period. In the histological analysis, the closure rate of the CB was significantly higher than in the AB group. The numbers of cells positive for runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) in the AB group were larger than in the CB group. Conclusions: The regenerative capacity of AB in the occlusive space of the rat GBA model was confirmed. Within the limitations of this study, the regenerative ability of the AB particulate transplant was inferior to that of the CB particulate transplant.
2
Regenerative capacity of augmented bone in rat calvarial guided bone augmentation model

Tatsuya Kubota,Akira Hasuike,Yasumasa Ozawa,Takanobu Yamamoto,Katsuyoshi Tsunori,Yutaka Yamada,Shuichi Sato 대한치주과학회 2017 Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science Vol.47 No.2
- 원문보기
Purpose: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is the most widely used technique to regenerate and augment bones. Even though augmented bones (ABs) have been examined histologically in many studies, few studies have been conducted to examine the biological potential of these bones and the healing dynamics following their use. Moreover, whether the bone obtained from the GBR procedure possesses the same functions as the existing autogenous bone is uncertain. In particular, little attention has been paid to the regenerative ability of GBR bone. Therefore, the present study histologically evaluated the regenerative capacity of AB in the occlusive space of a rat guided bone augmentation (GBA) model. Methods: The calvaria of 30 rats were exposed, and plastic caps were placed on the right of the calvaria in 10 of the 30 rats. After a 12-week healing phase, critical-sized calvarial bone defects (diameter: 5.0 mm) were trephined into the dorsal parietal bone on the left of the calvaria. Bone particles were harvested from the AB or the cortical bone (CB) using a bone scraper and transplanted into the critical defects. Results: The newly generated bone at the defects' edge was evaluated using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and histological sections. In the micro-CT analysis, the radiopacity in both the augmented and the CB groups remained high throughout the observational period. In the histological analysis, the closure rate of the CB was significantly higher than in the AB group. The numbers of cells positive for runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) in the AB group were larger than in the CB group. Conclusions: The regenerative capacity of AB in the occlusive space of the rat GBA model was confirmed. Within the limitations of this study, the regenerative ability of the AB particulate transplant was inferior to that of the CB particulate transplant.