RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        No difference in factual or conceptual recall comprehension for tablet, laptop, and handwritten note-taking by medical students in the United States: a survey-based observational study

        Warren Wiechmann,Robert Edwards,Cheyenne Low,Alisa Wray,Megan Boysen-Osborn,Shannon Toohey 한국보건의료인국가시험원 2022 보건의료교육평가 Vol.19 No.-

        Purpose: Technological advances are changing how students approach learning. The traditional note-taking methods of longhandwriting have been supplemented and replaced by tablets, smartphones, and laptop note-taking. It has been theorized that writing notesby hand requires more complex cognitive processes and may lead to better retention. However, few studies have investigated the use oftablet-based note-taking, which allows the incorporation of typing, drawing, highlights, and media. We therefore sought to confirm thehypothesis that tablet-based note-taking would lead to equivalent or better recall as compared to written note-taking. Methods: We allocated 68 students into longhand, laptop, or tablet note-taking groups, and they watched and took notes on a presentation on which they were assessed for factual and conceptual recall. A second short distractor video was shown, followed by a 30-minuteassessment at the University of California, Irvine campus, over a single day period in August 2018. Notes were analyzed for content,supplemental drawings, and other media sources. Results: No significant difference was found in the factual or conceptual recall scores for tablet, laptop, and handwritten note-taking(P=0.61). The median word count was 131.5 for tablets, 121.0 for handwriting, and 297.0 for laptops (P=0.01). The tablet group hadthe highest presence of drawing, highlighting, and other media/tools. Conclusion: In light of conflicting research regarding the best note-taking method, our study showed that longhand note-taking is notsuperior to tablet or laptop note-taking. This suggests students should be encouraged to pick the note-taking method that appeals mostto them. In the future, traditional note-taking may be replaced or supplemented with digital technologies that provide similar efficacywith more convenience

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼