RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia

        Koichi Hamada,Koichiro Kawano,Atsushi Yamauchi,Ryota Koyanagi,Yoshinori Horikawa,Shinya Nishida,Yoshiki Shiwa,Noriyuki Nishino,Michitaka Honda 대한소화기내시경학회 2019 Clinical Endoscopy Vol.52 No.3

        Background/Aims: Evidence that general anesthesia (GA) reduces the operative time of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) is currently insuffcient. This study aims to evaluate the effcacy and safety of esophageal ESD under GA. Methods: A total of 227 lesions from 198 consecutive patients with superficial esophageal neoplasms treated by ESD at 3 Japaneseinstitutions between April 2011 and September 2017 were included in this retrospective study. For ESD, GA and deep sedation (DS)were used in 102 (51.5%, GA group) and 96 patients (48.5%, DS group), respectively. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, or comorbidities between the groups. In the GA group, the tumorsize was larger (21 [3–77] mm vs. 14 [3–63] mm, p<0.001), luminal circumference was larger (≥2/3; 13.9% vs. 5.4%, p=0.042), proceduretime was shorter (28 [5–202] min vs. 40 [8–249] min, p<0.001), and submucosal dissection speed was faster (25.2 [7.8–157.2] mm2 /minvs. 16.2 [2.4–41.3] mm2 /min, p<0.001). The rates of intraoperative perforation and aspiration pneumonia were lower in the GA group,but the difference did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.242 and p=0.242). Conclusions: GA shortens the procedure time of esophageal ESD.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼