RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • CATA and RATA questions for product-focused emotion research: Five case studies using emoji questionnaires

        Jaeger, Sara R.,Lee, Soh Min,Kim, Kwang-Ok,Chheang, Sok L.,Roigard, Christina M.,Ares, Gastó,n Elsevier 2018 Food quality and preference Vol.68 No.-

        <P><B>Abstract</B></P> <P>Questionnaires are popular in product-focused emotion research with consumers. Ease of implementation is paramount in this regard, as is versatility. In the presented studies, focus is directed to scaling variations as an element of methodological versatility, and a comparison is performed of CATA and RATA question formats (check-all-that-apply and rate-all-that-apply, respectively). Five studies, with a range of tasted products and food/beverage names were conducted, involving 908 consumers in New Zealand, China and Korea. Emoji questionnaires, recently established as a methodological variant in product-elicited emotion research, were used. The average percentage of emoji used for describing samples was similar for CATA and RATA questions when used in Central Location Tests with tasted samples, but higher for RATA than CATA questions in online surveys. Discriminative ability of CATA and RATA questions was linked to the characteristics of the focal samples. The recommendation for method choice is to use CATA emoji-questions when samples have distinct emotional associations, whereas RATA seems better able to discriminate between samples with more similar emotional profiles. Neither CATA nor RATA emoji-questions were regarded by consumers as difficult or tedious.</P> <P><B>Highlights</B></P> <P> <UL> <LI> CATA and RATA questions were compared using emoji questionnaires. </LI> <LI> In 3 of 5 studies the average percentage of emoji use was higher in RATA than CATA questions. </LI> <LI> In 3 of 5 studies there was evidence of similar or greater sample discrimination by CATA than RATA questions. </LI> <LI> CATA and RATA questions were perceived as easy and not tedious. </LI> <LI> Choice of CATA vs RATA should be made in conjunction with sample set characteristics. </LI> </UL> </P>

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼