RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Comparative evaluation among various robust estimation methods in deformation analysis

        Khaled Mohamed Zaky Hassan 대한공간정보학회 2016 Spatial Information Research Vol.24 No.4

        There is different robust estimation methods used for detecting small gross errors which may be presence in geodetic observations. Some of these methods are robust M-estimators, Least Absolute Sum and Danish method. The conventional Least Squares Estimation method and these robust estimation methods have been tested and applied on a precise geodetic network designed for detecting earth’s crustal deformations using singlepoint and rigid body displacement models. The results show that, the method of least squares leads to biased, unfavorable solution and useless estimates if the singlepoint displacement does not taken into considerations in the solution’s mathematical model. In contrast, the results of robust estimation methods are attained unbiased in a single estimation step. A reliable separation of single-point displacement and the general deformation model is achieved without difficulties. The comparison of results proved that, the Danish method gave the most accurate results. It also was more sensitive to outliers which may be presence in surveying observations in case of applying single-point displacement model. The Least Absolute Sum method was very nicely reproduces the simulated deformations and does not show a contamination of the estimated positions of stable points in the case of rigid body displacement model. The results of adjustment using rigid body displacement model were not identical with the nearly correct results of single-point displacement model. So, the rigid body displacement model may be not suitable for geodetic networks.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼