RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNBs) compared to thoracic epidurals or multimodal analgesia for midline laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

        Bailey Jonathan G,Morgan Catherine,Christie Russell,Ke Janny,Kwofie Kwesi,Uppal Vishal 대한마취통증의학회 2021 Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Vol.74 No.5

        Background: Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNBs) have been investigated to control pain for abdominal surgery via midline laparotomy while avoiding the adverse events of opioid or epidural analgesia. The review compiles the evidence comparing CPNBs to multimodal and epidural analgesia. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using broad search terms in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane. Primary outcomes were pain scores and cumulative opioid consumption at 48 hours. Secondary outcomes were length of stay and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We rated the quality of the evidence using Cochrane and GRADE recommendations. The results were synthesized by meta-analysis using Revman. Results: Our final selection included 26 studies (1,646 patients). There was no statistically significant difference in pain control comparing CPNBs to either multimodal or epidural analgesia (low quality evidence). Less opioids were consumed when receiving epidural analgesia than CPNBs (mean difference [MD]: –16.13, 95% CI [–32.36, 0.10]), low quality evidence) and less when receiving CPNBs than multimodal analgesia (MD: –31.52, 95% CI [–42.81, –20.22], low quality evidence). The length of hospital stay was shorter when receiving epidural analgesia than CPNBs (MD: –0.78 days, 95% CI [–1.29, –0.27], low quality evidence) and shorter when receiving CPNBs than multimodal analgesia (MD: –1.41 days, 95% CI [–2.45, –0.36], low quality evidence). There was no statistically significant difference in PONV comparing CPNBs to multimodal (high quality evidence) or epidural analgesia (moderate quality evidence). Conclusions: CPNBs should be considered a viable alternative to epidural analgesia when contraindications to epidural placement exist for patients undergoing midline laparotomies.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼