http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Joel M. Jenswold (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
The United States and North Korea: Multilateralism and Security
Joel M. Jenswold,Mary Ann Kenney,Micahel Carnuccio 한국공공정책학회 2004 공공정책연구 Vol.15 No.-
Current tensions between the United States and North Korea are centered on the pursuit of a nuclear program by North Korea and nuclear nonproliferation. The Agreed Framework has collapsed amid mutual suspicions and recriminations. Efforts to resume negotiations have floundered as there is disagreement on even the most basic elements, including how many countries should participate. While the United States does not trust North Korea, the regime in Pyongyang is equally suspicious of American motives, especially considering recent rhetoric from the Bush administration and a policy of regIme change elsewhere. The authors conclude that the United States is most likely seeking either regime change or enfeeblement of the North Korean regime, outcomes clearly unacceptable to Pyongyang. The North Korean government is most likely adopting the familiar Cold VvT ar tactic of using nuclear weapons for prestige and leverage? as so-called "bargaining chips". The paper traces recent events in the relationship between North Korea and the United States, highlighting specific points that seem to be intractable. In particular, the authors examine American policy changes between the Clinton and Bush administrations, and consider options for the United States under the current conditions. Whatever its true motives, the current American approach is both unproductive and diplomatically expensive, creating friction even with South Korea. Both complete American military withdrawal from Korea and unilateral military action are unrealistic options for the United States. This leaves alternative forms of coercion (probably economic sanctions) or diplomacy (possibly including "diplomatic brinkmanship"). Economic sanctions rarely work as intended, and they are likely to be especially ineffective in the case of North Korea. This leaves a diplomatic solution as the most feasible option. The American insistence on multilateral negotiations appears to be a welcome departure from the pattern of unilateralism displayed by the Bush administration elsewhere, but the North Korean concern with prestige and economic reward for abandoning their nuclear program fuels their insistence on bilateral talks with the United States. There are excellent reasons for a multilateral approach; indeed, the authors stress that no durable solution is otherwise possible. However, there is no intrinsic reason to refuse bilateral negotiations as an initial step. The United States may do well to defer the leading role to South Korea, whose interests in this matter are just as compelling and far more immediate.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
