http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
構造改革에의 農政提言 : 生産性革命의 軌道設定을 위하여
崔鍾軾 한국농업정책학회 1973 농업경영정책연구 Vol.1 No.1
Mr. Mansholt, the Vice Chairman of European Economic Community, stated that it is hard to bring about an equilibrium in income between farming and manufacturing sectors with price policy. The disequilibrium existing between the two scrtors may be altered by an improvement of agricultural structure. Every nation in the world has made numerous agricultural laws aiming at improving farm income and to bring about an equlibrium in income between the sectors. However, without improving farm productivity, agriculture can not reach the income level of other sectors. This is why EEC indicated that farm structure must be taken into consideration in any farm policy in the future. It is also found, in the anual report of Japanese Economy, 1969, that the ideas, customs, social institutions developed throughout history of a nation could be improved, and current economy requires new ideas and organization or structure for its development as well as challenging affluence. It practically proposes an agricultural structure improvement through cooperative efforts for the increasing farm scale and farm machanization. How about in Korea? Of course Korea needs a structural improvement of it. At the same time it is difficult to expect our farming scale will become as large as western farms within two or three decades. Because present farming scale in Korea is too small. Therefore, it is expected that Korean farming can be improved its scale and effeciency of production through cooperative farming and management.
崔鍾軾 韓國農業政策學會 1974 농업경영정책연구 Vol.2 No.1
From the point of view of historical background the developed process of land system in France was almost similar with that of Korean. The farmers under Ancien Regime had paid rent in kind such as products rent as if they were $quot;$quot;the hommes de corps.$quot;$quot; By the French Revolution, both farmers and middle bourgioise were exploded in order to obtain freedom and independence from feudalistic privilage. However, it was the Parzelleneigentum for the small size of farm holdings that the French Revolution had brought accordingly. Such an evidence might be also founded by the famous Napoleon laws. In this time, the farmers in France were fulfilled to create ownership for land holding. As the result of this process, the small type of owner-operating farm system had made farmers to raise farm productivity throughout free land cultivation and fulgent incentives. The land tenure system in Korea before independence was the $lt;hommes de corps$gt; of products rent as it was in France under Ancien Regime. In other words, the results of land reform in Korea, in terms of the development of land tenure system, was not only the same as that of the French Revolution but also brought the parzelleneigentum of small size of farm holdings. However, on the other hand, such a prevailed small types of farmholdings had not only obstructed the capital system but also caused the shrinkage of the level of feudalistic technology. Therefore, it could be said that the characteristics for the development of land tenure system in France was privilaged by the types of small size of farm operating while the yeomanry in England and the Gutswirtschaft in German had helped to create the developedment of capitalistic system. By the same token, the recent Korean agriculture is stagnated at the lower level of technological advances because of privailing of the small type of farming as it was in France. In other words, it would be said that the developing progress of small types of farming in France and Korea is almost similar as we mentioned above. However, France has been brought significant progress of agricultural development by improving agricultural structures under SAFER and FASASA Programs. Korean agriculture needs also to challenge raising farm productivity by improving agricultural structure. The only desirable way that Korean agriculture can be promoting is to establish the large type of farming such as joint corporation throughout cooperative farm activities. In this way, the small size of farm holdings should be pooled into cooperative type of farming and distribute return according to contribution by farmers. In taking into account that the developing progress of Korean farming is the same as that of France. But the desirable way to solve the disadvantages of small type of farming is to develop the cooperative farming such as joint corporation in order to increase farm productivity.