RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        조동사 Do

        송정실(Jeongsil Song) 현대문법학회 2001 현대문법연구 Vol.23 No.-

        This study discusses the distribution of the auxiliary do in the framework of the Minimalist Program. It is generally assumed that the auxiliary do appears in the context where Infl is not allowed to attach to a verbal element, that is, Infl is stranded. But how the context results doesn’t seem to have been clarified yet except a few typical cases such as negative and interrogative sentences. The auxiliary do also appears in emphatic, imperative and VP-ellipsis sentences. Particularly in case of the imperative, the context seems quite difficult to describe. All the Infl-stranding contexts should be explained in the same manner. This study does that as follows. The emphatic sentence needs do when Aff, which is the emphatic morpheme appearing in the same position as not, blocks the covert raising of the main verb. The VP-ellipsis sentence needs do when the ellipsis leaves I stranded. The imperative needs do when negative or emphatic, regardless of auxiliary be or have appearing. This is because the auxiliary has some meaning and thus is not allowed to raise. The inverted ordering Don’t you ~ in the imperative is due to its lack of the EPP effect.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼