都市再開發事業法制의 問題點과 그 對策 : 合同再開發 方式을 중심으로

裵英吉(Bae Young-Kil) 부산대학교 법학연구소 1997 법학연구 Vol.38 No.1

公法의 規範 體系

裵英吉(Bae, Young Kil) 한국공법학회 2008 공법연구 Vol.37 No.1-1

공법이 전제하고 있는 규범체계에는, 고전적 법치행정의 원리 하에서 찾아볼 수 없었던 다양한 문제가 발생하게 되었고, 그 중 대표적인 문제로 대두된 것이 이른바, “법규명령(Rechtsverordnung)”과 “일반 행정규칙(allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschriften”의 구별 문제라 할 수 있다.19세기 독일의 국법학에는 민법적 개념이 상당 부분 침투되었으며 그 결과 국가에 고유한 법인격을 인정하되, 국가의 법인격은 법상 세분될 수 없기 때문에 국가조직 내에는 법이 스며들 여지가 없었다. 이러한 이론 전개는 라반트에 의해 그 이론적 단초가 제공된 것으로 이른바, 그의 유명한 불침투성 이론(Impermeabilitätstheorie)으로 대표된다. 옐리네크는 이 이론을 토대로 법규의 목적을 사회적 제한의 설정에 있다고 봄으로써, 라반트와 거의 동일한 방법으로 법규를 특징 지웠다. 그리고, 이러한 주장은 우리나라 공법학에도 지대한 영향을 미치고 있다. 그러나 공법개념의 체계는 사법개념의 체계와는 분리되어야 한다. 왜냐하면, 사법은 단지 개개인의 외적 생활과 관련이 있는데 반하여 공법은 총제적 인간(Gesamtpersönlichkeit)의 내적 생활을 정하고 있기 때문이다.우리나라 공법학에 있어서, 종래 主流를 형성해왔던 “전통적 법규개념”에 의하면, 그 내용이 국민의 권리․의무와 관계되든가, 권리․의무에 관한 효력 변동을 생기게 하는 규범이면 法規로 되며, 그렇지 않은 경우는 非法規인 행정규칙이다. 그리고 행정규칙의 개념은 보통 법규개념으로부터 소극적․공제적으로 정의하여, 행정권에 의한 일반․추상적 명령 중에서, 법규명령을 제외한 것으로 보는 것이 일반적 추세이다. 한편, 대다수 공법학자들이 ‘행정상 입법’의 제하에서 법규명령과 행정규칙을 다루면서, 그 구별의 표준을 “法規性” 유무에서 구하고 있으나, 행정규칙의 법적 성질을 논함에 있어서는, 오히려 행정규칙에 대한 법규성 긍정설이 다수설이 되는 등, 매우 혼란스러운 모습을 보이는 것도 사실이다.이러한 혼란을 초래한 원인으로서는, 무엇보다도 ‘法規’ 내지 ‘法規命令’이나 ‘行政規則’ 개념의 「성질」및 「형식」에 대한, 학자들 상호간의, 통일되지 못한 인식에서 비롯된 것으로 짐작된다. 결론적으로, 구속력의 유무로써 법규명령과 행정규칙을 구별하는 기준은 그 의미가 없어졌으며, 현재에는 ‘상위법의 수권’ 유무라는 단일 기준에 의해 구별하는 수밖에 없다(수권유무기준설).또 당해 명령의 ‘실정법상 형식’(대통령령, 총리령, 총리명, 훈령, 고시, 예규 등)이나 ‘외부적 구속력’의 유무, ‘공포의 절차·방식’ 등도 엄격한 법적 의미에서 양자의 구별기준이 될 수 없다.대통령령·총리령·부령은 법규명령의 형식이 아니라 행정권이 발하는 ‘명령’의 형식으로 이해하는 것이 옳다. 그리고, 법규명령의 ‘형식’이나 행정규칙의 ‘형식’과 같은 말은 법리적으로 정확한 표현이 아니다. 결론적으로 양자의 구별기준을 찾는다면, ‘상위법의 수권’ 유무뿐이며, ‘법규성’이나 ‘일반적 구속력’의 유무를 기준으로 양자를 구별하는 것은 불가능하다.

大學의 법적 지위와 國家 監督의 限界

배영길(Bae Young-Kil) 한국비교공법학회 2001 공법학연구 Vol.3 No.1

大學의 學則에 관한 硏究

裵英吉(Bae Yeong-Gil) 한국비교공법학회 2004 공법학연구 Vol.5 No.1

This study is basically focused on the school regulations and the legal status of the university. Including the problem of laying down school regulations, the legal characters and effects of the school regulations of the university are examined through the methods of comparative legal analysis. In Korea, there were some legislative efforts to enhance the ability of self-government of the university during the past few decades. With the appearance of the educational reform plans to extend the autonomy of university since the middle of 1990s, 'the Education Law' was reorganized into 'the Higher Education Law' as a more specialized legislative system for the universities, and the provisions previously regulated by the same law have been stipulated through the school regulations now (Clause 3, Article 6 of the Higher Education Law and Clause 1, Article 4 of the Enforcement Ordinance). Furthermore, considerably encouraging legal efforts have been also made through alleviation to control the school regulations by state, from the approval system to the report system (Clause 2, Article 6 of the Higher Education Law). But the Special Law for management of the National University has not got through Congress now, however, the legislative purpose of this law is to uplift the ability of self-government of university and the efficiency in management of the national universities. Consequently, the basic matters of the university organization, personnel management, finance and the essential particulars of the universities should be regulated by the law, but the other necessary matters except the above-mentioned matters should be delegated to the school regulations. Because only this system can enhance the ability of self-government of the university, and can show the university's characteristic and diversities, and can also improve the efficiency of the university management through the competitions among the various universities in good faith. This study fundamentally aims at the review of the legal status of the university that is in charge of the important role in the 21th century, and especially, the study on the school regulations of university in connection to the self-governing matters of the university. The foundation of this study depends on the method of the literature study, which is mostly associated with the study of the positive law, precedents and theories. And basically, the methods of the legal policy are added to the methods of the legal interpretation in this study. Meanwhile, the legal conception of the school regulations of university as the subject of this study can be a matter whether this should be confined to the formal meaning (narrow meaning) as prescribed in the Article 6 of 'the Higher Education Law' and the Clause 1, Article 4 of 'the Enforcement Ordinance' or not. However, the separation of this conception into two (Formal & Substantial meaning) is not always easy due to the ambiguous limitation and the lack of particular difference in the legal treatment. Thereupon, this study investigates the all internal rules of the university such as various regulations regardless of the rule forms, on the basis of the school regulations in the substantial meaning.

水産關聯法令의 立法體系 및 改善에 관한 硏究

裵英吉(Bae Young Kil) 한국토지공법학회 2002 土地公法硏究 Vol.16 No.1

  The current fisheries laws and regulations system of Korea was initially designed to govern fisheries in the territorial sea rather than in the exclusive economic zone. And the fisheries law system in Korea has supported mainly to increase domestic fish production rather than conservation of fisheries resources.<BR>  During the past decades, major world fishing grounds have been closed, fish stocks have been depleted due to overfishing, coastal states have had more exclusive right on conservation and management of fisheries resources in their national jurisdiction.<BR>  As a result, traditional fisheries laws and regulations in Korea need to be changed in accordance with the new international circumstances.<BR>  In addition, under the mandatory legislation system, generally speaking, an act of parliament is accompanied with a presidential decree and a ministrial ordinance, but the Fisheries Act of Korea has four presidential decrees and fifteen ministrial ordinances. This intricate & complicated legislation system in Korea needs to be clarified and divided into several different independent acts.<BR>  Recently Korean government enacted the Fishing Ground Management Act(2000. 1), the Cultivating Fisheries Upbringing Law(2001. 8), the Inspection of Fishery Products Act(2001. 1), and several other acts (the Fisheries Resources Management Act, the Safery Operation Law of the Ships, etc) are in being enacted process.<BR>  But many other provisions among the new acts are overlapping with the existing Fisheries Law of Korea. Therefore, to solve those structural problems regarding the Fisheries Act of Korea, it is necessary to separate the existing acts into several different acts and to reorganize many other administrative orders into a concise legislation system.<BR>  This study provides the overview of the whole framework of the fisheries laws in Korea, and seeks after improvement of the structural problems in mandatory legislation system.

선박안전조업규칙의 法理的 問題 및 改善 方案

배영길(Bae Young-Kil) 한국비교공법학회 2002 공법학연구 Vol.4 No.1

This Study aims to provide the overview of the whole framework of the administrative regulations for safe operation of the ships in Korea and to seek after improvements regarding these regulations in Korea. Especially, the Ordinance for Safe Operation of the Ships in Korea enacted in the form of joint ministerial ordinance in 1982 has been revised ten and several times thereafter. But it is reported to have many legal problems and to need to be changed in accordance with the legal mandatory legislation system. Generally speaking, the Rule of Law Principle means that the freedom and rights of citizens can be restricted only by law enacted in Parliament. In other words, the rights of citizens can not be restricted by administrative rules alone such as presidential decree, ministerial ordinances, instructions, directives etc. It is described in the Constitution of Korea (Article 95) that the head of each executive Ministry can issue ordinances of the executive Ministry concerning matters that are within their jurisdiction, under the powers only delegated by law or presidential decree. It is said that the aforementioned ordinance is based on Article 34 of Korea Fishery Law(2001. 1. 29) as a authorization law, but it does not seem to be sufficient authorization law legally. To solve these structural problems regarding this Ordinance basically, it is necessary to enact new Law tentatively named the Safety Operation Law of the Ships. And it also needs to reorganize several administrative rules into a concise mandatory legislation system, like as The Safety Operation Law of the ships - A Presidential Decree of the same name- A ministerial Ordinance of the same name. In addition, there are some problems to be solved, namely, the sphere of jurisdiction among the competent authorities, like as the Navy, the national Maritime police, the Ministry of maritime affairs & fisheries and the Local autonomous entities.

土地區劃整理制度의 內容과 그 憲法的 限界

裵英吉(Bae Young-Kil) 부산대학교 법학연구소 1995 법학연구 Vol.36 No.1

條例의 法的 地位

裵英吉(Bae Young-Kil) 한국비교공법학회 2000 公法學硏究 Vol.2 No.-

韓國地方自治의 課題

裵英吉(Bae Young-Kil) 한국비교공법학회 1999 公法學硏究 Vol.1 No.-

課徵金 制度에 관한 연구

裵英吉(Bae Young-Kil) 한국비교공법학회 2002 공법학연구 Vol.3 No.2

The administrative money penalty system can be defined as a contrivance against to a violater of the law to compel performance of a duty indirectly by deprivation of the profit caused by violation of the law. But with the lapse of time, a transformed system appeared instead of the typical form, which is designated as administrative money penalty in substitute for the license suspension in a public utility corporation to mitigate a public discomfort of every day life. There are some problems we must take into account to improve the system efficiency. The first is to mitigate the possibilities of double jeopardy in introduction process of the system. It is considerable that only when one fails to pay his financial debts, only then we can go into the criminal procedures. The second is a problem connected with imposition procedures as hearing or notice, etc. Above all, a notice of punishment to an offender against the law is an indispensable procedure. The third problem is an absence of consistency in the forms & criteria of the system. To enhance reliable relations & legal stabilization among people, consistent legislative attitude is demanded urgently. The fourth problem is connected with insurance of practical efficiency by uplift of a sum of money. Unexpectedly a sum of administrative money penalty provided in every statute is so small that it has a possibility of danger to lose practical effect. And the last point is to ensure an adequate exercise of administrative discretion. In exercising administrative discretion in deciding a sum of money, it is necessary to decide it by the frame that based on a directive from a higher official in the limits of the law.