http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
朴性鳳(PARK Sung-bong),李仁哲(토론자) 고구려발해학회 2004 고구려발해연구 Vol.18 No.-
Introduction: Where the Problem Is Raised 1. Korean History and the Identity of Koguryo: a Literarily and Militarily Great Power Which Encompasses the Continent and the Ocean centering around the Korean Peninsula 2. Tendencies of Research and Shift of Identity in the Study of Koguryo in Modem and Contemporary Korea Conclusion: Reflections upon, and Reshaping of Identity in the Historiography of Koguryo First of all I will make an argument that one of the characteristics of the Korean history lies in the fact that in ancient times Korean forefathers settled down as farmers in tile Korean Peninsula and established a nation of cultural richness. In that context, I will locate tile identity of Koguryo in the historical fact that Kogurian people made belated agricultural settlements and developed into a literarily and militarily Great Power encompassing the East Asian continent and the ocean. In that sense, the age of three-kingdom marks the most developing period in Korean history, in which northern and southern forces competed each other. It made an aftermath into establishing Balhae and Japanese ancient nations. Its vital power was strong enough to accomplish tile Buddhist culture of the Great Silla dynasty at its highest level. It is lamentable that these days we are trying to underestimate the value of United Silla, neglecting this kind of cultural and ideological development, even belittling it, and have failed to pull ourselves out of this confusion, sticking to the territory lost under some circumstances. This paper attempts to evaluate affirmatively the Korean history by confirming the identity of Koguryo and contribute to restoring the national pride in the excellence of the Korean traditional culture. And this goes on to preclude the wrongful logic of China and Japan and restablish the identity for the new age. We now have a chance to make it possible for Eastern and Western culture to have meaningful dialogues, mobilizing the potential energy of tradition and accomplishing eagerly anticipated unification of Korean peninsula. I've been very interested in the identity problem which was presented in the preceding studies made in the latter half of 1970's because I've approached the history of Koguryo from the point of view of history of ideas. So I've already tried to bring this aspect into relief. synthesizing studies and monographs on the southward expansion policy of Koguryo in 2002.
동아시아에서 (특히 한국사)에서 廣開土好太王碑 연구의 역사적 의미
朴性鳳(PARK Sung bong),李在碩(토론자) 고구려발해학회 2005 고구려발해연구 Vol.21 No.-
Koguryo constructed a world in which there was no rival and dominate the continent and the sea off the Korean Peninsula. This project was pursued through the policy of southward advance by King Kwanggaeto and his successors. We can make sure of this fact by an analysis of Horae's Stele. First of all, there is an argument that the feature of this policy was nothing but to reflect shift in power balance in the Korean Peninsula, but this point of view appears to have been arisen from a misled conception in which one will not understand Peninsula-centered character of our national history in a proper sense. We shouldn't judge this policy of southward advance by the perspective of northward advance as if it were the absolute one. We may also evaluate Koguryo's development affirmatively after the transfer of its capital to P'yongyang, in such respects as the increase of its population and fruitful harvest of 5 kinds of grains, etc. The transfer of its capital also made a great contribution to building a national identity by sharing food, clothes and shelter in common. So Koguryo's southward advance was not just a result of a change in political power but also a beginning in the building process of Korean nationality. In this respect, studying King Horae's Stele is of great importance in the close examination of this process. Secondly, the transfer of Koguryo's capital and subcapital to the Daedong River and Central region of Korean Peninsula, respectively, can be seen to have been the result of the change in its national character. Therefore, it is a great error to look upon Koguryo just as a state centered on the Korean Peninsula or to consider Manchuria and Korean Peninsula separately. Here, in this article, I put a great emphasis on the folloing ponint: i, e., we need to have a Peninsula-centered historical view putting together the continent and the sea.