RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 경제위기 해석론의 쟁점

        박석삼(Suk-Sam Park) 경상대학교 사회과학연구원(사회과학연구) 2014 사회과학연구 Vol.32 No.-

        There have been conflicting explanations over the global economic crises and neoliberalism. This paper will argue that it is not proper to explain crises with “historical cost profit rates” by Kliman; that the law of the tendential fall in the rate of profit is ascribed as a direct cause of the crises; that unlike Kliman or Brenner, the long recession since the 1970s have not persisted, but like McNally, it has become "new normal"; that like Dumenil, the globalization of finance is not the sole causes of the crises, and so on. Therefore, in order to explain the subsequent consequences of the crises in 1970s, the triple expansion of global capitalism since 1980s, the financial and currency crisis of 1997, and the fiscal debt crisis since 2008, the three key elements are required to consider simultaneously: globalization of competition among capitals as a cause of over product and over investment; the globalization of production as a response to intensified competition; and the globalization of finance based on the dollar severed from gold standard.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼