http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
계획환경의 변화에 대처하는 도시계획가의 역할 모색에 관한 연구
권원용(Kwon Won-yong) 한국도시행정학회 2008 도시 행정 학보 Vol.21 No.1
In Korea, most professional planners have trained as a technician maintaining a long tradition of architecture and civil engineering. The purpose of this paper is to shed light on the diverse roles of urban planners, responding to current changes in planning environment. Focus groups are used to brain-storm ideas that would improve the quality of professional planning practice. The first section describes the five typical roles played by planners, along with their shared values: i.e. technician, administrator, advisor, advocate, and communicator. The second and third sections present, respectively, external mega-trends and internal shifts that have real impacts on planning process. The last section highlights the working relationship between government officials and technical planners in engineering companies. Practitioners assert that there is an enormous mismatch between theory and practice; little attention is paid to public interest, knowledge, and participation in planning. They are struggling to overcome the bloated bureaucracy and ensuing repetitive procedural chores. However, the recent appearance of planning officials, still in their infancy, are hopefully expected to play technocrat roles. In conclusion, the newly emerging roles of practicing planner will be threefold: facilitator, coordinator, and mediator who master the skills of inter-personal communication and negotiation.
권원용(Kwon Won-yong) 한국도시행정학회 2010 도시 행정 학보 Vol.23 No.4
The principal purpose of this essay-like paper is to arouse renewed interest in the traditional planning paradigm, taking the current institutional framework of Korea into consideration. What is planning? This has been a die-hard square one question addressed both to academic and practicing planners for a long time. Myriads of its definition have been made reflecting the multi-facetedness of planning activities. The nature of planning, by and large, can be summarized as follows: purposeful rational behavior, anticipatory decision making for problem-solving, and future-oriented and vision-sharing processes. At least, two broad rationales are provided for justifying government intervention in the free market: One is planner's effort to correct so-called 'market failure'; The other is professional concerns over distributional justice and public interest, not to mention utopian thinking about the good city. Accordingly, the conclusions imply that both 'instrumentally rational' and 'communicatively rational' aspects should be emphasized in educating young planners to become politically savvy.