http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 黄辰 (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
黄辰 원광대학교 법학연구소 2016 圓光法學 Vol.32 No.3
Academic discussion on the death penalty has never stopped, especially in the "Criminal Law Amendment (eight)", "Criminal Law Amendment (nine)" A lot of the abolition of the death penalty Legal Advisors, the retention or abolition of the death penalty to introducing a small debate upsurge. Radical scholars advocate that the death penalty should be completely abolished, conservative scholars believe that the death penalty should be kept. Through the study of Japanese criminal law on the regulation of the death penalty, it is found that Japan is a country that retains the death penalty, but it is different from China's legal policy and legal tradition. China and Japan in the death of the death penalty, the death penalty execution procedure , the execution of the death penalty and the death penalty in the criminal law system, the status of the problem, there are some differences. Status of the death penalty in Japan has a reference to the correct understanding of the death penalty system in our country, the future development of China's death penalty can be divided into three stages: The first phase, in the physically and procedures strictly limit the death penalty; the second stage, the death penalty into the long-term rarely applicable period; the third stage, the spread of humanitarian become abolitionist core power.
eArticle
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
