http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
( Gregory J. Moore ) 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2011 ASIAN PERSPECTIVE Vol.35 No.4
This article brings an international relations perspective to the discussion of the science and policy of avoiding a Sino-US arms race in space. A blind adherence to realist and space nationalist assumptions, without considering alternative approaches such as the policy options offered here, will likely doom China and the United States to a long, expensive, and potentially dangerous arms race in space for decades to come.
Bismarck or Wilhelm? China’s Peaceful Rise vs. Its South China Sea Policy
( Gregory J. Moore ) 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2018 ASIAN PERSPECTIVE Vol.42 No.2
The choice facing China today is whether it will follow the precedent set by Otto von Bismarck―which appears to be its stated goal―or whether it will (intentionally or unintentionally) follow the path of another German leader, Kaiser Wilhelm, and pursue a policy of military growth, territorial and/or maritime expansionism, and a relative disregard for the concerns of its neighbors. The South China Sea will be an important test case, an arena where China’s choices will impact its relations with its neighbors and other great powers like the United States.
“In Your Face”: Domestic Politics,Nationalism, and “Face” in the Sino-Japanese Islands Dispute
( Gregory J. Moore ) 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2014 ASIAN PERSPECTIVE Vol.38 No.2
While China`s rising power is certainly an important variable in Sino- Japanese relations, it cannot explain either why the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands dispute broke out anew in the fall of 2012 or why the Chinese response was so strong. China read Japan`s move to nationalize the islands as an in-your-face move designed to show disrespect for China and make Japan`s sovereignty over the islands a fait accompli. In this article I borrow from Robert Putnam`s notion of two level games to argue that there are two levels of face politics going on in this case: one between domestic actors in Japan and in China, the other between the two countries. A solution to the territorial dispute can only be found when both sides` "face needs" are recognized and met at both levels of analysis.