RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        『文学案内』誌研究Ⅲ-報告文学の実践と集団制作『東洋の一日』

        海老原豊(Ebihara Yutaka) 동북아시아문화학회 2013 동북아 문화연구 Vol.1 No.34

        This study aims of analyzing the literary argument of Reportage which was argued by Kishi-Yamaji and <One day in the East> as the group works which was invited public participation as the practice of it in <Bungaku-Annai> magazine. By the way, <One day in the East> as the group works was practiced in response to <One day in the world> which Gorky proposed it. First of all, in relation to genre of Reportage those essays is rare at Japan and Korea. Therefore, I will examine Reportage in Chinese literature for reference. Because in the Chinese literature the Reportage is systematized and reaches it at the present. The following part, I’m going to examine the literary argument of Reportage on <Bungaku Annai> magazine, and make clear difference with it of Chinese literature. And lastly, I will analyze <One day in the East> as the group works . <One day in the East> was written just after The February 26 Incident(on February 26, 1936). Therefore, <One day in the East> was described with this incident in the view points of workers who directly witnessed it. And I will reevaluate their analysis of those days. In analyzing the view of The Showa 10s which was described in <One day in the East>, I think that we can have a glimpse of The Showa 10s Japan.

      • KCI등재

        貴司山治と徳永直から見た「芸術大衆化論争」とナルプ解散

        海老原 豊 동북아시아문화학회 2010 동북아 문화연구 Vol.1 No.23

        The discussion on the popularization of art in proletarian literature is discussed in many cases from the so-called discussion in 1928 to the NALP's resolution(a resolution for the popularization of art) in 1930. However, just before this NALP's resolution in 1930, there was the other discussion in which Kishi Yamaji participated. And there was another one in which Tokunaga Sunao participated after the NALP' s resolution in 1930. As a result of those discussions on the popularization of art, NALP emphasized the dogmatism by Communist Party. Therefore NALP caused an inner conflict among NALP members. And after a while the external factor(the suppression of 3․15, 4․16) has resulted in NALP's dispersion(in 1934) with it not been solved. This study aims to clarify the inner factor of a NALP's dispersion according to investigating comprehensively those discussions (from 1928 to 1934), including discussion in which Kishi and Tokunaga participated. Moreover I will investigate Kishi Yamaji and Tokunaga sunao's biography in writer too, because they had a greate influence on the Chosen Pro literature in those days.

      • KCI등재

        『文學案内』誌研究(2) - 実録文学論と田村栄太郎の「大衆文学のよみかた」-

        海老原豊 동북아시아문화학회 2012 동북아 문화연구 Vol.1 No.30

        The study of <Bungaku Annai>magazine(2)-Focusing on the literary criticism of the documentary stories and 'How to read the popular literature' by Tamura Eitaro Ebihara Yutaka Kishi Yamaji proposed the literary criticism of the documentary stories as an outcome of the efforts that criticized the absurd popular literatures and was going to approach the reader from the writer side in healthy popular literatures for the fourth the art popularization discussion in the proletarian literature. And what was serialized in “Bungaku Annai Magazine” as the first step of the literary criticism of the documentary stories was “How to read the popular literature” by Tamura Eitaro. Because the documentary stories of the late Edo period was becoming basic of the established popular literatures. First of all, this study investigates how it was proposed with the literary criticism of the documentary stories of Kishi Yamaji and how it is taken up with “Bungaku Annai magazine”. The following part looks into how the documantary storie of the late Edo period was becoming basic of the popular literatures. Finally part looks into “how to read the popular literature” by tamura. Tamura criticized on the documantary storie of the late Edo period, “Tyuji Kunisada” “Hikozaemon Okubo” “Komon Mito”. So This study aims to re-examine the validity of Tamura's essay through each works.

      • KCI등재

        『文学案内』誌 研究 : 行動主義文学論議を中心に

        海老原豊(Ebihara Yutaka) 동북아시아문화학회 2011 동북아 문화연구 Vol.1 No.28

        〈Bungaku Annai〉 magazine published in July, 1935. This magazine(the chief editor: Kishi Yamaji) was an expression of his belief after conversion, for the purpose of construction of new literature by the working masses. However this magazine has planed tie-up with activist workers in the early times. Therefore, this magazine was different from before Marxists. This paper aims for analyzing the point of contact between 〈Bungaku Annai〉 magazine and Literary of Activism in japan. First of all, I will examine of the literary argument of activism in japan on 1930’, the following part, examining how was it developed the literary argument of activism on 〈Bungaku Annai〉 magazine in the last stage of it’s argument. Through this study, I think what is the point of contact between 〈Bungaku Annai〉 magazine and literary of activism workers.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼